Jump to content

Rookieblue

Retired Staff
  • Posts

    2,231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by Rookieblue

  1. I agree here. Personally, I would like to see rolls utilized more often in RP situations to better balance out actions and to give each side a fair chance.
  2. https://gaminglight.com/forums/topic/34315-scp-addition-format/
  3. + Support, would be in line with lockdown, hazmat, and thermal rules which are of similar nature. Would just require a slight MOTD update. 11) You must have an RP reason to go under a lockdown or call for hands up protocol.
  4. - Support While uncouth, I do not see conduct rising to the level of a warning or other formal punishment on a staff level.
  5. Moved out of the archives, not sure why you posted there.
  6. Unlike the majority of people, I think gagging the person would be warranted in this case if they're continuously swearing at you while you're trying to handle your sit. + Support from me
  7. + Support I'd suggest that you would have to be a trained researcher already, with a rank cut off decided by Research Command.
  8. There is a new ruleset for SCP 1048 and 1048-A that should hopefully be put in place soon that addresses some of these issues.
  9. No, it seems that you were heard, but the fact that Jakub literally watched you do the opposite and held you accountable for your actions, including lying about what you were doing, wasn't what you wanted to have happened. The evidence is clear and supports Jakub's side of the story here. You admitted to using a soundboard, which is contrary to the MOTD rules on the subject. You killed another player, despite SCP 1048 not killing people in lore, only cutting off their ears. You stated the medic was behind a counter and hadn't actually hit you, despite a very clear screenshot showing that that isn't true at all. So yes, Jakub completely disregarded what you said, because you were clearly untruthful in your answers, and there was overwhelming evidence against you. - Support
  10. I handled this issue in-game last night. This player was warned for RDM x2 and given a 900 second jail time for that infraction. I was not made aware of the revenge killing, only the intentional RDM which was confirmed via logs, and based on Fear's admission of doing it.
  11. The instituted rule was the MTF include a valid reason when adverting thermals, and the example given was if they noticed SCP 966 potentially breached. If MTF are aware that CI have breached, and they're aware that CI have cloaking technology (which they are), I think it's completely valid for them to use thermals in that situation. - Support
  12. + Support This sounds like a good idea, it would improve overall lore friendlyness, and make 076 more exciting to play. Otherwise, I'd also support a similar recontainment procedure to 682, where 076 would need to be lowered to a certain HP before he can be tranqed.
×
×
  • Create New...