Jump to content

Dr. Ternith Plague

Member
  • Posts

    258
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Dr. Ternith Plague

  • Birthday 06/17/2004

Recent Profile Visitors

3,073 profile views

Dr. Ternith Plague's Achievements

Rising Star

Rising Star (9/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

27

Reputation

  1. Lore - 15/15 [10 points for entity lore] [5 points for test result accuracy based on lore] The main points gathered from the test: 096 was accurately represented, 035 was accurately represented (in best capability to GamingLight lore). 035 'killed' 096 and he was brought back to the chamber and came back to life. I'd say lore accuracy and test accuracy is rather accurate. Length - 20/20 [15 points for page length with no filler] [5 points for photos] You have test photos, and from what I see, there is no filler. No reason to take points here. Creativity - 15/15 [15 points for original test] [1 point taken for every other test with same hypothesis (within 6 months of posting)] Nothing seems out of the ordinary here! No one has had a similar test idea within 6 months so you should be good. Grammar - 29.5/30 [Default 30 points for grammar] [.5 points taken for 1 grammar mistake] Went through this with Grammarly - most of it was hyphens and nitpicking, but there was one misspelling mistake and one which I debated about taking off, but didn't since the message was still conveyed clearly (on instead of about), but otherwise, still good. Format - 19/20 [10 points for original format] [10 points for required information] You made your own format, so 10 points there. There's no dedicated section for stating your lore name in it, however you do put it in multiple times, so it's just one point taken off, just make sure to put it in for future tests. Otherwise, all good! Misc - 0/0 FINAL SCORE 98.5/100
  2. ROA or LOA: LOA Name: Ternith Rank: Member Start Date: 12/14/2022 End Date: 12/25/2022 Reason: Burn out, also cutting close to Christmas with my college winter semester on my plate.
  3. Lore - 15/15 (Does the document follow currently established GL/SCP lore?) Killing SCP-035 with sand is a really good idea. I couldn't think of that even if I tried, and using an AIC to monitor containment post-termination attempt is a great idea in of itself. Top score here. Length - 20/20 (For the test, is the document the appropriate length and is there major filler?) 13 pages? This is the longest document I've read so far, and this includes all the procedures and notes for 035 involving GamingLight and SCP in general. Great work on the length, no space was wasted! Creativity - 15/15 (Has the test been done before? If so, does it change circumstances or does it aim to corroborate previous test results?) Like I said - 035 killed with sand is such a unique idea that it hasn't been done before. And ensuring that a temporary task force was created was an even better idea. Good work. Grammar - 30/30 (Can the test be understood in a grammatical standpoint? Are there glaring grammatical or punctual errors?) Minimal grammar mistakes, if any. I don't see a reason for no max score. Even if there was any, it's surrounded by excellent grammar that I don't see a reason why you shouldn't get max score here. Format - 20/20 (Does the test meet the minimum required format to be graded? If not, is it replaced by an equally acceptable requirement?) This is the part where I look at the format and the basic format requirements. You not only added the required bits of information such as your name, the SCP in question, the idea and method, and ongoing details. But you also slammed down a stack of papers involving SCP-035 and your own addendums to be added. You even made a breach protocol in case he breached containment during testing! Misc - 1/0 (Does the person somehow go above and beyond in some form? If so, why?) God DAMN. I haven't given a misc point to any test excluding this one. This has such unique elements that I have no choice but to give a point here. God damn, good work. FINAL SCORE 101/100 I've never gushed over such a test log. I think it would go as far to be recommended for the Wanderer's Library. But, we'll see where that goes. Until then, I wish you good luck on further endeavors. ~ Research Asst. Supervisor, Ternith Plague
  4. Lore - 15/15 (Does the document follow currently established GL/SCP lore?) The lore fits what we know about SCP-049's 'cure' and the 'pestilence'. Special Containment Procedures listed also make sense. Length - 20/20 (For the test, is the document the appropriate length and is there major filler?) Four page document, with most of the needed information attached. The only thing I could recommend is some pictures of the SCP in question, though the GIFs added quite a bit! Creativity - 10/15 (Has the test been done before? If so, does it change circumstances or does it aim to corroborate previous test results?) Interviews like this have been done before, asking SCP-049 for its origin, what the pestilence is, what the cure is, etc. I can't say its the most creative, but the questions were varied. Grammar - 27/30 (Can the test be understood in a grammatical standpoint? Are there glaring grammatical or punctual errors?) Only a few misspellings here or there, but nothing too bad. Format - 20/20 (Does the test meet the minimum required format to be graded? If not, is it replaced by an equally acceptable requirement?) This is a creative use of an entirely new format. It would be seen as an Audial/Visual Format, however, with SCP interviews, you can't exactly be 'visual' when the interview is entirely audial. Overall, liked the format and your own minor additions to it! Misc - 0/1 (Does the person somehow go above and beyond in some form? If so, why?) Not really any outstanding circumstances in this test to provide an extra point. FINAL SCORE 92/100 This was a nice test log to read. Very refreshing to go back to the basics, though not overall creative. I'm certain if you started writing a series of ideas down to brainstorm and get feedback from other researchers, you would do greatly. ~ Research Asst. Supervisor, Ternith Plague
  5. -Support You might be asking... why -Support? Well, mostly server load. Same reason why I didn't like the PAC3 suggestion - this is just PAC3 with extra steps. Not that I don't like it, it'll just make the server lag to shit.
  6. +Support ALLFATHER GIVE ME THE STRENGTH TO SLAY MY ENEMIES ON THE SITE-05 ELEVATOR! In all seriousness though, old sites were great to play on, just needs quite a bit of optimization before we consider it.
  7. +Support Holy shit, the hell are y'alls heads going with this? I mean, I want more SCPs to test on but... god damn.
  8. Other than format, +Support gimme more SCP to test on.
  9. +Support Great idea! But don't forget the format.
  10. +Support Not MTF myself other than RRH, but the additional card scan seems unnecessary.
  11. +Support New players getting to the surface that just want to mine getting killed because they just happened to pass by E-11 base while going to diamond mines seems like quite the annoyance and would probably discourage escape gameplay other than for the CI training or XP.
×
×
  • Create New...