Rookieblue

Not necessarily. If GENSEC is required to keep a presence in lower D-Block, if the D-Class decide to rush and kill those guards, they have a better chance of potentially getting up and out while those GENSEC players are waiting NLR over all of GENSEC standing on top of the elevator and shooting down.

This is an interesting suggestion, I think I could be in favor of this. GENSEC would need to maintain a presence in lower D-Block to maintain order and prevent unauthorized people from using the elevator because they would have a more defensible position, they could also engage in more RP with other branches, and it could put an end to the constant TDM in D-Block.

This suggestion was made pre-nerf, and is now probably outdated.

+ Support I like the new audio, I think it would be a great replacement!

I would disagree with the comment about this being bad for the server. Yes, this would be another thing for newer players to learn about, but that's why if this were to be implemented the rules would be clearly defined in the MOTD. One of the biggest issues with the server is the large learning curve for new players, which is why we're trying to make sure that the MOTD is kept up to date and has relevant information on it. There are quite a few times when players won't hop on SCPs specifically because they're otherwise going to just sit in their cells forever. That's kind of a mixture of issues with D-Block and such as well, but that's a discussion for another time. Allowing SCPs to be able to self breach when specific criteria are met would allow for better RP opportunities across all the branches, increase playability on the SCP jobs, and could potentially lead to better outcomes overall on the server.

Zeeptin stated in Discord that he'd work on nerfing it tonight.

SCP is clearly the best obviously.

- Support Unfortunately, I can not extend my support to your staff application at this time. Looking over your profile, you haven't really engaged with the community here on the forums. Generally, we like to see a minimum of 25 posts on the forums to show that you're committed to working in the community and getting to know the other players. Moving to the next issue, your question 16 response is pretty lackluster. Generally, what we're looking to see in this question is to see your thought process on how you would deal with sits, what you look for to make your decision, and how you would justify an action that you would take. Unfortunately, I don't see enough that would provide me a good enough window into your thinking on this.

I'll just go ahead and copy and paste my response in your last appeal request. I'm gonna be blunt here, you've received 65 warnings across the entire community. You received 64 second chances to change your behavior, including 4 bans. Why exactly do you deserve a 65th second chance?

Moved to correct location

- Support Serve your time, show that you care about the wellbeing of the server by doing better when the ban is over.

Blackbeard noooooooooooooooooooooooo

Servers are currently under maintenance and will be back up asap!

Security Officer Rookieblue

I'm gonna be blunt here, you've received 65 warnings across the entire community. You received 64 second chances to change your behavior, including 4 bans. Why exactly do you deserve a 65th second chance?

From a staffing perspective, we already have to keep a pretty tight eye on this job when they breach. Having more on would only intensify that need.

All hail the D-Class human ladder!

I'm sorry to see you go Ternith, it was always a ton of fun staffing and playing with you. I wish toy good luck moving forward and hope to see you around in the future!

Your In-game: GL Rookieble / Senior Tech Rookieblue Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:42428330 / 76561198045122389 The player's name in-game: Bob the Blob The player's steam name (If you know it): STEAM_0:1:506158287 / 76561198972582303 What did the player do: 30th warning reached Evidence (REQUIRED): https://gaminglight.com/bans/player/76561198972582303 What do you believe should happen to the player: While the staffing handbook recommends a 6 hour ban from the server, I request that individuals read the various warnings this player has been issued. Significant history of FailRP, significant history of disrespecting other players, including telling them to kill themselves, a recent ban he served for mass racism, and general mingery. Due to the severity of his actions, and his continued actions that demonstrate he does not plan to change his actions, I request this player be considered for a permanent ban from our server. Any extra information:

The keycard that SCP-912 spawns with is not high enough to open the GENSEC spawn door, meaning that SCP-912 isn't able to let themselves out of the spawn point if there isn't a GENSEC member on as well.

Moved to bug reports

- Support He heard (saw) you before you crouched. When he hits you once, he knows you're still there. Continuing the attack is well within the RP bounds of his attacks.

shhhhhh. He was in front of me when it happened so I found out from him first.

+ Support from me