Neo Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 (edited) What you want to see? Allow Senior Command in branches to have Roster access. Why should we add it? It's tough for large branches to stay up to date when only 1-3 people can update it. Hopefully most branches trust their Senior Command to move around dates and names. You can't even copy and paste from the roster so work is much more annoying. What are the advantages of having this? Helps keep roster up to date. Allows Senior Command to purge members correctly and perform other Officer duties. Helps out our lovely, hard working High Command. Who is it mainly for? Everyone! Edited April 18, 2020 by Neo SCP-RP Moderator | CI LTCOL Boozle LC32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritz Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 +Support I like the idea but it should only be reserved for those that are the most trusted in senior command as it shouldn't be a wide sweeping thing Was Nu7 2LT Shot Once Was a Nu7 MSGT also was a CI Captain once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starr Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 +support What ritz said on very trustworthy people, but also, it may be more useful to more filled branches like CI and GenSec (Utility have it from what I know and if not then them too), so boom. insert cliched signature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Propane Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 26 minutes ago, Ritz said: +Support I like the idea but it should only be reserved for those that are the most trusted in senior command as it shouldn't be a wide sweeping thing 1 minute ago, starr said: +support What ritz said on very trustworthy people, but also, it may be more useful to more filled branches like CI and GenSec (Utility have it from what I know and if not then them too), so boom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skela Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 +support/ This gives Senior Command a chance to know how to lead a branch and gives them the abilities to do what High command does. Yuh imm@ Thash Dat B¡tch!!*^€{ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 +/- Support, sure it'd be easier for the branches, but also carry some risk, we've had some immature Senior Command before. "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakub Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 +support would help keep stuff up to date and im sure a ltcol is trusted enough to access the roster. Ex E11 COL, Ex A1 MAJ, Ex AHOTS, Ex Security 2LT, Ex Admin. Current CI 2LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggo0 Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 41 minutes ago, Falxen said: +/- Support, sure it'd be easier for the branches, but also carry some risk, we've had some immature Senior Command before. I don't think we should make this required. High command can give them roster access if they think they wouldn't abuse it, and would update it frequently. SCPRP Director of Logistics, Event Team | Former Nu7 2LT, Former Senior Admin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starr Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 5 minutes ago, Doggo0 said: I don't think we should make this required. High command can give them roster access if they think they wouldn't abuse it, and would update it frequently. read the suggestion, its not required, its allowed insert cliched signature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a frog Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 1 hour ago, starr said: +support What ritz said on very trustworthy people, but also, it may be more useful to more filled branches like CI and GenSec (Utility have it from what I know and if not then them too), so boom. E11 1LT []FORMER CI MAJOR[]Former MTF OMICRON-9 CAPTAIN[]Former Janitorial Low Command[]Former E11 HCMD[Former overseer of D4,Former experimental, Former E4]"The fuck is a ethics committee?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bionicle Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 2 hours ago, Ritz said: +Support I like the idea but it should only be reserved for those that are the most trusted in senior command as it shouldn't be a wide sweeping thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Zeus Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 3 hours ago, Ritz said: +Support I like the idea but it should only be reserved for those that are the most trusted in senior command as it shouldn't be a wide sweeping thing @Neo what rank would you suggest for MTF as we don’t have senior command as such Former || SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin || Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catsro Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 -Support its high commands duty to update the roster every 3 days and if they fail to update the roster in that time then they would be punished accordingly. Most branches don't exceed more than 60 people which doesn't make it hard to update the roster within 3 days. The only roster I would see that might need Senior Command support would be gensec seeing as 3 people have to update over 150+ people on one roster. SCPRP Head Admin | Ex SCPRP Event Team Leader | Ex CI LTCMDR | O5-13 Catsro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixx Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 4 hours ago, Falxen said: +/- Support, sure it'd be easier for the branches, but also carry some risk, we've had some immature Senior Command before. [ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Alpha_ Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 +1 Personally it would be more of a optional thing ngl but ye please so I can have my senior command assist us in our continously growing roster. Former DHOS Current GENSEC LTCOL - Deputy Head Juggernaut - HIRU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killaz Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 1 hour ago, Catsro said: -Support its high commands duty to update the roster every 3 days and if they fail to update the roster in that time then they would be punished accordingly. Most branches don't exceed more than 60 people which doesn't make it hard to update the roster within 3 days. The only roster I would see that might need Senior Command support would be gensec seeing as 3 people have to update over 150+ people on one roster. Wait...I don't have to update the roster every day? I speak the truth Currently Nothing of Gensec, SCP-RP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fool Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 +/- Support Me and bread don't have trouble with updating the roster and we usually don't have to do many roster changes a day anyways only branch that I could see needing this is Security with how many people they have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bread Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 (edited) -Support Only GENSEC needs this Edited April 19, 2020 by Bread lol, lmao even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted April 19, 2020 Author Share Posted April 19, 2020 (edited) 12 hours ago, Catsro said: Most branches don't exceed more than 60 people We have 80 right after a purge.... Also roster has to be update every 2 days. Edited April 19, 2020 by Neo SCP-RP Moderator | CI LTCOL Boozle LC32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giovanni Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 13 hours ago, Catsro said: -Support its high commands duty to update the roster every 3 days and if they fail to update the roster in that time then they would be punished accordingly. Most branches don't exceed more than 60 people which doesn't make it hard to update the roster within 3 days. The only roster I would see that might need Senior Command support would be gensec seeing as 3 people have to update over 150+ people on one roster. It's been said before, HCMD will be the only ones who have roster access. This isn't going to happen. Retired E11 CMDR | Retired Admin | CI CPT | Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiniLeopard Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 19 hours ago, Ritz said: +Support I like the idea but it should only be reserved for those that are the most trusted in senior command as it shouldn't be a wide sweeping thing +Support ^ 15 hours ago, Catsro said: The only roster I would see that might need Senior Command support would be gensec seeing as 3 people have to update over 150+ people on one roster. It would only make sense for GENSEC because of this ^ The United Kingdom, made up of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, is an island nation in north-western Europe. England – birthplace of Shakespeare and The Beatles – is home to the capital, London, a globally influential centre of finance and culture. England is also site of Neolithic Stonehenge, Bath’s Roman spa and centuries-old universities at Oxford and Cambridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalfunctioningTurnip Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 On 4/18/2020 at 7:04 PM, Catsro said: -Support its high commands duty to update the roster every 3 days and if they fail to update the roster in that time then they would be punished accordingly. Most branches don't exceed more than 60 people which doesn't make it hard to update the roster within 3 days. The only roster I would see that might need Senior Command support would be gensec seeing as 3 people have to update over 150+ people on one roster. Retired Gensec Captain/DHFTO | Vegetable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cryolast Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 -Support Honestly, even though security is a very big branch we don't have any issues updating the roster, it is updated regularly by us high command and having 6 people editing the roster would in my opinion be a nightmare. I have beat HOS Killaz In minecraft parkour 1v1s any times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Novah Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 2 hours ago, Cryolast said: -Support Honestly, even though security is a very big branch we don't have any issues updating the roster, it is updated regularly by us high command and having 6 people editing the roster would in my opinion be a nightmare. This could be a bad idea very fast, if I'm correct Igneous actually mentioned before that only HCMD will receive access. I'm doing a big guess that this will not change for a few reasons good reasons that I'm sure everyone can figure out. | Retired Head Gamemaster Emily | Super Admin Emily | Retired Nu-7 Colonel, Vice Marshal, & Seventh sister |"if you live among wolves, you have to act like a wolf." - Nikita Khrushchev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 If Gensec High Command wishes, their Senior Command can have roster access. All other branches will be limited to high command. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts