Jump to content

Knuckles

Member
  • Posts

    350
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Knuckles

  1. +Support Removes conflict of rule and in-game perma prop textscreens
  2. -Support *Taken directly from E-11 lore page on SCP Wiki* They are a special ops force deployed to Foundation Sites when standard protocols fail and multiple breaches are imminent. As such, most of their operations are classified. By the logic this quote gives they wouldn't even be on site unless everything was going to shit (DEFCON 2 and possible 3).
  3. First or second day as a TMod... brought LITERALLY EVERYONE because I cant type
  4. Foundation doesn't technically know that though. Otherwise he would have been "dealt with" long ago. In their eyes he is simply a trusted Level 4 member of Foundation personnel
  5. Add this to the list of things Dr. Bright Skela isn't allowed to do at the Foundation
  6. Name(in-game): Knuckles Steam ID(must be in the steam group): STEAM_0:1:92194481
  7. Name: Knuckles Identification (SteamID): STEAM_0:1:92194481 Current Rank: Member Do you wish to stay on the Team: Absolutely Can you stay active throughout the summer season: Outside of work hours most definitely
  8. +/- Support - More friendly to lore - 096 is ridiculously underpowered (anyone seeing its face whether for 0.1 or 3 seconds would set it off See: Four F***ing Pixels - Banning tranquilizers outright would be ridiculous | 096 is only unstoppable until 096-1 has been terminated, after that it returns to its passive/docile state Side note: If 096 isn't "enraged" then a roll shouldn't be required to bag it as it is peaceful and not exactly trying to escape, if it is enraged then you didn't have a chance anyway
  9. Establishing secure connection to encrypted email server... Connection Confirmed | Please enter credentials User: CTF D9 [DATA EXPUNGED] | Password: [REDACTED] Credentials confirmed, you are anonymous to all users except those with level 4-Email clearance and [REDACTED] Recipient: scpFoundation.decrypt(dataHack.geoLocate(RnD)) Subject: Fixing this for you CC: scpFoundation.ciCommandSecure(scpFoundation.decrypt(network)) Message: Chaos Insurgency, Red Right Hand to crush us D class, if you see this message you should surrender, we will never save you We fear the Foundation (Fixed that for you) -Regards, [REDACTED] run SCiPTerminal.exe Enter command: expunge record -24h Confirmed... deleting all records for this device for the past 24 hours Enter command: logout -d Logging out user CTF D9 [REDACTED] and disconnecting from server Welcome to SCiPNet | Please enter login credentials User: | Password:
  10. *Hears stone scraping* *Hears "Hello"* *Sees a picture slide under the door followed by a loud scream*
  11. - Support - 9/10 Knowledge of the SCP lore does not equate to "you can ask me about an scp in site 05 and ill tell you alot about it" | 9/10 knowledge would mean you have a wide variety of knowledge about the actual lore of the Foundation (i.e things not on the server). - For the question "Why should we allow you to be a member of the Event Team?" you basically just posted an apologetic sob story and asked for us to take pity on you | This doesn't tell us why you should be accepted, just that "im coming back begging the good people of Gaming light Event Team to accept me back" - Writing conventions are atrocious and clearly not reviewed before posting application - The moment I read your event idea I immediately thought a couple of things: CI already have military grade gear and technology, just look at the heavies and infiltrators and beyond We already have Anti CI Units... we call them the MTF units Your failsafe is having the MTF come in and just massacre any CI left... that is unbalanced and ridiculous
  12. Name/Rank: MTF Nu7 SSGT Knuckles | Knuckles Duration: Ending next Tuesday (May 7th) Reason: Handling work and school IRL as well as to "recharge my batteries" so to speak P.S I may still be on some, this is just being posted to say that my activity will be decreased
  13. All this would do is create a giant paywall. Expert and Pro are both donor classes. Not to mention the fact that there is no hierarchy for D class besides the "gangs" some of them form. D class are literally convicted felons the Foundation appropriated for experimentation. I am also going to reiterate my point: Unless you want to have all the on duty staff stalking D block and doing nothing else how do you plan to enforce this?
  14. Knuckles

    Husky's LOA

    Can we get an MTF squad to make this incident disappear? From what I've seen Husky is active and dedicated. I enjoyed his presence when playing as D class or during brief stints as GENSEC heavy
  15. Done multiple events with him, he is mature and likes to have things well thought out +Support
  16. In-Game Name: In game I go by Knuckles or either of my Mobile Task Force designations (MTF Nu7 SSGT Knuckles SS01 | MTF A1 RCT Knuckles) Steam Name: [GL] Knuckles SteamID: STEAM_0:1:92194481 Are you a Moderator+?: I am currently an SCP RP Moderator as of writing this. How often are you on TeamSpeak?: On days I am not working I will always be on Teamspeak. Do you have a working quality mic?: I possess a working quality mic for communication. What timezone are you in?: I am in the US Eastern Timezone (EST) Why would you want to join our Support team( 100 words+): I want to join the Support Team to provide assistance to everyone who may need it throughout the course of their day. I have had my fair share of issues with Teamspeak and I want to make sure no one has to wait to get help with an issue they may not know how to solve. As a lot of users are more accustomed to Discord as of late many need help with Teamspeak. This is something I believe I am able to provide and would be able to do so in an efficient manner. I want to join the Teamspeak so people can get into the action as quickly as possible. Outside of technical support the Support Team also works with new members. Servers such as Military and SCP RP require their members to be in Teamspeak when the reach a certain rank. As a Moderator on SCP RP I understand this and want to make sure they aren't held up by not being able to get passed screening in Teamspeak. How do you think you could affect support staff in a positive way?: I have advanced knowledge when it comes to Teamspeak. I have made test servers and rigged them from scratch simply to learn the various ins and outs of Teamspeak. I believe this experience would add to the quality of support I could provide to the team. I also believe I bring a friendly and open mindset that is willing to help out players regardless of how small the problem may be. I am not the type to give up on a technical problem and I would see the issue through to the end to make sure a player's Teamspeak experience is the best it can be. How would you greet someone that has a problem in one of our support channels?: If working at Chick-Fil-A has taught me anything, I will always greet someone with a smile. In the case of Support I would give a friendly greeting and hear them out as to what the problem may be. I will then use all my knowledge to help solve this problem. If I don't know how I won't stop looking until I find someone who does know. Have you read our rules and do you promise to uphold all those rules to the best of your ability?: I have read the rules and will uphold them to the best of my ability.
  17. While I see this is very relevant I see difficulty for the exact same reason D class don't have NLR. That is to say how would it be enforced? If this was added (similar to D class NLR) staff would have their hands full all the time with nothing but calls about D class riots.
  18. What you want to see? - I would like to see formal additions to the rules regarding termination of foundation personnel (excluding D class obviously) by MTF or Security forces Why should we add it? - I have two reasons why this should be added. The first reason is that while it is widely accepted that if a foundation member is seen committing a traitorous act such as breaching an SCP or trying to kill another that they can be marked for termination there is still no official allowance for this in the rules, so it would fall under the category of RDM. My second reason is that the MTF Alpha 1 SOP has guidelines regarding termination of personnel at various clearances depending on DEFCON should it be deemed necessary. This is lore friendly and as of right now is still technically RDM. I would also like to see the addition granted to Nu7/NTF as well (though with more strict/situational constraints) What are the advantages of having this? - The advantages of this would be that it would allow for a more lore friendly environment as well as avoiding RDM cases that shouldn't be RDM to begin with. Right now if an A1 shoots a Technician who was getting in his way during a DEFCON 2 it is still technically RDM. It may not be punished by an official warn or a minge but it is still RDM all the same. This addition to the MotD would formally allow for MTF units to fully carry out their lore based SOPs as well as allowing MTF and GENSEC to terminate personnel deemed to be committing traitorous acts. Who is it mainly for? - MTF units Links to any content - N/A
  19. Upgrade the security clearance needed to access it's containment locker. We don't need Keter classification for an object easily contained. After reviewing security footage I can safely state that the only reason the bell was rung in the first place was due to blatant disregard for standard safety protocol for stationary anomalous objects. Keter designation is reserved for objects that exhibit properties that make it dangerous AND hard to contain (hence the reason 173 remains Euclid, all you have to do is stare at it). Revised containment protocols/testing restrictions are recommended but a Keter upgrade would not fall in line with how we have come to designate Keter objects in the past -MTF Nu7 SSGT Knuckles (Designated responder to the scene of the breach) Object Class FAQ What is the Locked Box Test? The Locked Box Test is an informal guideline used to determine an object's most appropriate Object Class. It goes like this: If you lock it in a box, leave it alone, and nothing bad will happen, then it's probably Safe. If you lock it in a box, leave it alone, and you're not entirely sure what will happen, then it's probably Euclid. If you lock it in a box, leave it alone, and it easily escapes, then it's probably Keter. If it is the box, then it's probably Thaumiel. Note that as a special consideration, something that is autonomous, alive, and/or sapient is almost always at least Euclid-class. That is, if you lock a living thing in a box and forget about it, it will eventually suffocate or starve to death, and that's not a good outcome. Something that is intelligent could also end up being smart enough to outwit its containment procedures and/or stop cooperating with the Foundation's attempts to contain it, making it more dangerous than it otherwise might be.
  20. *Gets false demoted off of the Administration job*
×
×
  • Create New...