Creamey

Yes

+/-support

+/-support

-support Considering the tendency of CI to maintain a strong position in armory, giving an Armorkit to one of the most played subclasses would likely cause near absolute unstoppability to CI during their raids. Overall, I would say +/-support leaning towards minus. This branch update is very clearly attempting to buff most of not all CI classes being changed in the update, and provides barely any fairness to other branches. Some bits of the branch update are balanced as CI is occasionally heavily outnumbered, but most of it seems simply one-sided. I’m not looking for an argument, I am simply stating my opinion. I’m also going to bring up the fact that you are attempting to put the Barret M82 on a job that is for I believe PFC+ (I’ve only heard this, I haven’t confirmed this). For those of you who do not know, the Barret M82 is a sniper rifle that was recently buffed. There have been many complaints of it being on the Security Sniper job—a job only for SFC+—and even a forums post to remove it from Security. I think it is fair for the 5th Security rank to retain the sniper if CI is going to be receiving the sniper for the 3rd rank. What I’m trying to get at is that either both branches should have it or no one should. Mind you, Security SFC+ are finally now using the Sniper class—a class hardly used before the buff—and some people want to take that away.

-support Considering the amount of problems that you have caused within the server, I do not think that you are nearly ready for the responsibility of being an ACM. Almost all of my experiences with you have been bad, and I truly don’t think your demeanor would be a good fit for ACM. Activity could also be worked on.

ACM main gang.

Also please send me the link to that physgun reskin.

+support It’s extremely obnoxious when SCPs camp Gensec bunks to the point where Security can’t even make it to D Block and perform their main job. Camping of Gensec bunks has played a major role in the decrease of Gensec morale in the recent weeks. Hopefully, moving bunks back to its original location will solve that problem.

Godspeed

+support If the player starts abusing the swep, just warn em.

Wraps it all up^^^ It’s kind of exciting when double-crosses occur, seems more realistic.

^^^^^^ Also giving a D Class a Sterling is probably not a good idea.

Big +support I thought that it was changed, then it wasn’t, then it was. Reducing the ammo so drastically was not a good move, and it should definitely be brought back up or at least close to it.

Why would they change back something they implemented yesterday. Plus calm down it’s not that bad. You say that it should be revoked because it makes Gensec’s job easier, when we need a break seeing as D Class CC NLR recently got reduced to 1 minute.

It was always fun hanging out with you for the short time you were in ET, and when I tried to replace you doing Security CI PT. CI lost a great leader today. You will be missed.

+huge support Phill has done an outstanding job staffing for the player base, commuting countless hours of his time to help players. He undoubtedly deserves the rank of Senior Admin.