Jump to content

Creamey

Member
  • Posts

    561
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Creamey

  1. +support -incredibly active -devoted to Research -great command member -friendly -Moderator AND Event Team which means he’s responsible and trustworthy Need I say more?
  2. +support -friendly -reached highest non-command rank -part of Event Team so he is responsible and trustworthy
  3. +support -easily one of the nicest researchers -achieved highest rank below command -professional during tests
  4. Full Name: Creamey J. Cheesey (Randy Gunk) Occupation: Researcher of the Research department. Requested Name(i.e RIG Unit [Number] [Name]): RIG Unit #1976 Aperture Who gave you permission to apply?: RAM/OR4 Cancer, RM GLaDOS Why should the foundation authorize your requested unit? (80 word minimum): I believe I should be authorized to operate a RIG Unit because I have had an enormous amount of experience on the server regarding taking up new and important positions among my peers, and handling these positions with the utmost responsibility. For example, I have become a part of GENSEC command as well as a member of Event Team, so I know to the full extent, the level of responsibility required to take up this position, and I can guarantee that I will not disappoint. Along with those positions, I have also become the Vice Commander of RCF, and have experience hosting meetings, which shows that I have the level of professionalism to take up this new opportunity. I have recently left one of my other branches, just so that I could pursue my work in Research, and I plan to stick around for quite some time, all the while growing in experience. Finally, I always do my best to impact our branch as a whole, whether it be making a new SCP suggestion on the forums, or impacting my peers in game through friendly interactions. Thank you for the opportunity!
  5. I trained you so I guess I’ll promote you. Dogz hop on if I want a promotion too. (I’m really glad I got to experience that training before you resigned.)
  6. 1. Name of the SCP you would like added: SCP-178, SCP-178-1 2. Link(s) to playermodels: https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=1334262096 - Playermodel (SCP-178-1) https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=974537849&searchtext=178 - Playermodel (Additional instance of SCP-178-1) 3. Link(s) to sweps: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1455911028&searchtext=178 - Item entity that allows you to war SCP-178 and see SCP-178-1. The actual SCP-178-1 NPC. Link above requires links below https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=947544649 - Model/Wearable Entity (SCP-178) https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=1334262096 - NPC (SCP-178-1) 4. How much health/armor do you think it should have?: In this case, SCP-178-1 is an NPC and does not have a set health and armor. SCP-178 is an item. 5. Why should we add this SCP?: I believe you should add this SCP because this is quite a popular SCP that many players are familiar with. Players would have barelt any problem adjusting to the addition of this SCP for this reason. This SCP would grant an enormous amount of testing potential, and would give Researchers something entirely new to RP with. Additionally, this would allow for some of the empty containment cells to in HCZ or LCZ to house a new SCP and begin to fill the empty cells. The NPC cannot harm anyone not wearing the glasses, which would make this SCP incredibly functional for the server. In my opinion, there is more RP research potential with this SCP than many other SCPs if it were to be added to the server. This would also allow for a new SCP for CI to steal from the Foundation. As long as the Insurgent wearing the glasses does not make contact with the SCP/NPC, then they can safely steal the SCP for testing. CI RND can also benefit from the addition of this SCP; if Moderators/Admins/Event Team are permitted to spawn in an additional NPC of SCP-178-1, then RND would be able to conduct feasible tests and sell the SCP back to the foundation. Finally, I believe that this SCP holds incredible cross-test potential, and would greatly impact both Research and CI RND, while also affecting the server as a whole. 6. Basic summary of the SCP: SCP-178 is a pair of 3D glasses that, when worn, will make the wearer able to see creatures from a supposed "separate dimension". These creatures (SCP-178-1, SCP-178-2, etc.) will become extremely hostile towards the wearer if any contact is made between them, whether verbal or physical. This will almost always result in the death of the individual who has made contact with one of the instances. This death is caused by sever lacerations that will show up on the individuals body following contact with an instance. - http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-178 7. Extra information: To my knowledge, the NPC is capable of noclipping through doors. This may only apply to certain maps and I am unaware if it will function on the Gaminlight Site 05 custom map. If it is possible, it will need to be prevented from clipping through certain doors so it can stay within a set perimeter and Research tests that include D Class can flow properly. You can drop the glasses by typing "drop178" in the console. The glasses will need to respawn after a couple seconds on its stand after the wearer has been killed and the glasses are on the floor. I believe that SCP-714 functions this way in game but I am unsure. Recommended area of containment: one of the empty glass chambers in Lower Heavy Containment Zone.
  7. +++++++++++support very detailed suggestion and seems like a viable addition. good job chief
  8. What you want to see? - The version of G-Mod that the server runs on be set to the March update version. Why should we add it? - Since the April update has caused most people’s in-game mics to be extremely quiet, it has become a struggle for FTOs to train and branches to communicate. I don’t doubt that people will take LOAs or even leave the server because of this problem. What’s more important: mic quality or mic volume? What are the advantages of having this? - Players will be able to communicate with each other as easy as they could before. Players would not have to deal with the struggle of the new system. Players won’t have to hold their mic to their mouth to talk to people. I assisted an event today and I struggled to explain what the even was to the participants because I sound extremely quiet to others. Who is it mainly for? - The entirety of the server’s players. Links to any content - N/A
  9. Creamey

    Gensec NLR - Denied

    +support I’m the RCFXO, and honestly this is a fair suggestion.
  10. +support We need this back so mainly enlisted understand this.
  11. What you want to see? - The Security Juggernaut’s armor be upped to 200 from 160. Why should we add it? - Due to Igneous’s recent armor buff to most Security classes, I believe it can’t hurt to buff one other classes armor by 40%. More reasons listed below. What are the advantages of having this? - Security Juggernauts could defend against D Class and CI for longer periods of time before having to return to medbay. Research escorts are less likely to die when running into a problem, if one should arise. Juggernauts can stay alive longer when assisting with MTF or defending personnel/VIPs. Better defense against CI ABBA (I think that’s the name) units who are a large problem for Security. This will also help deal with the newly added knives which was the main reason security got an armor increase. Who is it mainly for? - Security Links to any content - N/A
  12. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LDzf9pRMWre2p013PDpV11C6F8t73DnryHc6is9facw/edit?usp=sharing
  13. Goodbye to the man that has promoted me for more than half my ranks.
  14. +support Thanks Rabbit
  15. +support In all my time of playing on this server, I can’t think of a nicer and fairer person than Blight. I think that his general calmness and fairness would make him a perfect fit for the job. Plus he has past experience on ET. For those of you that don’t see him on the server, I can vouch that he plays on Security, E11, SCPs, etc. It may not be much coming from me, but trust me he’s there. (ooc he has a different name in E11 so maybe that’s why)
  16. -support Incredibly unprofessional. This is exactly why you shouldn't be chosen for the position.
  17. +support I would love to join this and I’m sure so many others would
  18. Medical staff deserves all the RP they can get.
  19. +support not a donator but I’m sure this must be annoying to deal with at times.
  20. Lore Name: Creamey/Randy Rank: Junior Researcher SCP: SCP-912 Question / Idea: Will 912 still attack an individual even if a small piece of armor is removed or something is removed from his pocket? Background Research: I have witnessed 912 attack people if they attempt to take off his helmet. Hypothesis: 912 will attack if a small piece of armor is removed. 912 will not attack if an item from his pocket is removed. Observations (What Happened During Test): After the D Class removed 912's kneepads, he was attacked. After he removed an item from 912's pockets he was attacked and killed. Evidence/Visual Stimuli: Analysis / Conclusion (What Could Of Caused The Results): 912 will attack a person regardless of what is removed from his person. Was Your Hypothesis Correct?: Yes and No
×
×
  • Create New...