Jump to content

Rookieblue

Retired Staff
  • Posts

    2,231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by Rookieblue

  1. While it was an abuse of admin powers, Lilfrog didn't attempt to hide his conduct and was honest when confronted about it. Additionally, as long as it's confirmed that only 500 xp was given, a simple verbal warning would suffice for this offense.
  2. + Support I would not give Boris my backing for this promotion if I didn't think it was well deserved. Boris went out of his way to help me write the recontainment procedures for the recent MOTD update, and I've seen him very active as a staff member on the server. The few times I've run into him while he's working, he's been nothing but professional, and knows how to handle himself in a variety of circumstances. I fully support Boris' application and look forward to him joining the ranks of admins in the future.
  3. + Support I've worked with Nex on a number of occasions and he's been nothing but professional, hard-working, and has a strong understanding of how to handle his duties as a moderator. I'm fully confident that Nex is ready to advance to the position of Senior Moderator.
  4. You both are nuts, but awesomely dedicated to the server
  5. + Support I think having a core group of SCPs that are always on the map, as well as a group of rotating SCPs that allow for different tests that be conducted and such, would be beneficial to the server.
  6. Yeah, the video shows you receiving PMs from another SCP warning you that there are people trying to femur you, and you run by a Class D without attempting to attack him.
  7. People who have to get up for work at 6:15am generally.
  8. +/- Support I think it would make sense to make a minimum HP barrier for the tranqs to be effective since lore-wise it would be almost impossible to recontain him if he were to escape his containment cell. I don't know 682's total health off hand, so I'm not sure how 500 stacks up to his full health level, so that number may have to change.
  9. th3 we're going to send an age appropriate person to put you to bed, that's not healthy. I get anything less than 7 hours and I hate life, how are you even conscious?
  10. Not sure that insulting another person is a great way to go about suggesting stuff, but okay. As I said, adding restrictions on when Class D's can riot would essentially be implementing this type of rule.
  11. Why are you making your words so large, bejesus. Getting all the Class D to follow that type of rule where they need a valid reason to riot will never happen. That would essentially be implementing an RDM rule for Class D against GENSEC, and staff would be issuing warnings every two seconds.
  12. - Support Lockdowns are one of the few effective tools GENSEC has for stopping riots. Full lockdowns are held for a maximum of 5 minutes at a time, unless authorized longer by a Site Admin.
  13. I think this would be a cool duty to add to MTF, but I don't think adding an entirely new set of classes for this specific purpose is worth it. - Support
  14. I would support lowering the rank requirement to call a lockdown to GENSEC Captain, as well as including MTF Low Command+ IF MTF is in D-Block. I would also support extending the lockdown to 10 minutes. I have worked on the server a few times in the past couple days where it was "activate the lockdown", 5 minutes elapse, "deactivate the lockdown", D-Class immediately riot and kill GENSEC, "activate the lockdown".
  15. Tl:Dr of Changes: Rules section reorganized to break down rules that apply server wide and that are class specific. Also reorganized to put like rules next to each other. Added explanation of some rules to help newer players that may not know the terminology. This applies to RDM, FailRP, NLR, FearRP, and MicSpam. Removed rules that are no longer active on the server (that Boris and I were aware of), including SCPs announcing their breaches Added specific examples for rules to better help with enforcement on staff side, including no exploiting to get through checkpoints, or prop blocking and spawning. Added class-specific rules to the corresponding class explanation. For example, specific rules that SCP-1048 must follow, etc. This includes codifying specific timers for how often SCPs can use their SWEPs, like 1048, 106, etc. Added recontainment procedures for each SCP that could potentially need to be recontained under the specific class descriptions to help newer players, and reduce the "I play it this way, not that way" arguments. Again, thank you Boris for the amazing help provided for this piece! Added descriptions the best I could manage for SCP 1245-2 and 194, in addition to their specific rules since no description was provided there. I didn't make any radical changes (that I'm aware of anyway, lol), only sought to clarify rules for newer players to the server, since when I was new I had no idea what I was doing half the time, and the MOTD wasn't the most helpful for some stuff. If you'd like a further break down I could work on that if you'd like as well!
×
×
  • Create New...