th3

That isn't really funny. -Support

It’s a good thing the server opened late 2018 then

I would take a little peek at your own posts on the forums before complaining about childish behavior and off topic posts. Calamity made a valid point that clearly requires some discussion which did happen. However, your expectations on the behavior exhibited by a Super Admin is laughable when looking at your own behavior ingame in the past. Not only is your post disrespectful to Calamity for expressing his opinion, its off topic and very childish. There are private messages for a reason so in the future keep it there. -/+ Support The use of proxy mines with no discernable way to rp around them without prop abusing is concerning and should not be allowed, however MTF can patrol as they wish and if there is an obvious raid coming then its not their fault for securing the Entrance Zone which they are allowed to do. (Without breaking any rules regarding props or other things in the motd.)

someone's salty

Site 19 ^^^ For real though, TFA CSGO needs a buff and the CI Infiltrators should be able to raid by themselves

Given you deleted your previous appeals that did contain information that was relevant to why I denied those in the past, I don't think this is going to be a fair consideration of your changes since you were staff restricted. However, this wouldn't be the first time you deleted posts of yours that either faced large amounts of -supports or would have been used to prove you haven't changed. In my opinion, given that I was the one who staff restricted you. I do not think you have improved to where a removal of the staff restriction would suffice. You are immature, and that hasn't changed. I even have an example of you being an asshole from a few weeks ago which reinforces my view on your "change". My apologies for the language but you were being a dick and I think that was because I resigned. In fact I know it was because I resigned due to what you did. I'll go into detail if requested but frankly I wont in this post. You showed no signs of improvement previously and given your deletion of your two previous appeals, I think you are just trying to make sure the public opinion on those two previous appeals cant be considered just like when you changed your name. You continually show no sign of owning up to your mistakes and you clearly haven't learnt your lesson. If I could make it a permanent staff restriction then I would, unfortunately I was nice with a 1 year when it was originally a permanent one.

If you believe people are not contributing then report the posts. Until then don’t tell me what to do.

It’s not like it’s a super secret facility that is supposed to control the flow of people in and out. Not like they aren’t allowed to make sure people are authorized enter.

This wouldn’t qualify as a staff report in my eyes. Easily a player report.

If I was able to report posts on the forums then I would report your post. It does not contribute anything and distracts from the topic at hand. If you have an issue with his post then report it especially when you aren’t contributing to this at all except to project your view on his post which I might add was already resolved. A better way to do this would have been to pm him because and I’ll be honest, his post was perfectly reasonably and was not inciting an argument or anything provocative. You just look like a dick with that post I quoted. On a side note I really appreciate a JMT member commenting on a suggestion. Too bad he just limits his responses to 1 word

Why is it just three quotes with no context as to what he was talking about in ooc. You should provide the full screenshots instead of just what he was saying.

-Support The whole idea was that HCMD members who have access to the channel can contact A1 when a command member for A1 isn't able to. Or at least it was when we implemented it. I don't think it will be taken like a super serious breach in security for them to see O5 considering its only A1 who rdm people over it.

Please learn engrish

-Support It literally just was placed in the ss car dealer and now you want to remove it from their simply because you like it.

Definition of a shit post right here

+Support Probably one of the most polite, active, and good staff members on the policerp staff team. I’ve only had good experiences interacting with LuckyGoose both ingame and in his role as a Support member. Maturity, activity, and a great role model for staff. I don’t think anyone else is as qualified for Senior Admin as him. The effort on this application is exemplary as being straight to the point in answering each question to the best of his knowledge. Good luck as you deserve it!

+Support I’ve only heard good things about utetwo and I think he is more than qualified for staff again.

+Support This would be better for new players.

+Support Its a new scp and people shouldn’t have fun with it? It would most likely open more ways for research to test on it.

I thought it was already nerfed.

+Support

They actually should, I think it is bugged.

The best part is SS would be able to arrest a corrupt president etc, and then going to trial would be so cool.

+Support on increasing the slots on RCF. This doesn't take away from MTF in my mind as they shouldn't really be in LCZ/D Block which is where they normally are. The larger slots will allow Gensec to handle D Block appropriately without having MTF interfere.

The whole idea of a suggestion is to spark a discussion. It isn’t planned out over several months. Obviously people put their opinions here, the whole idea is list concerns and flesh out all the positives and negatives that such a suggestion would have. I don’t like that you are implying that we don’t have an actual plan because you don’t either and it’s rude. In fact the statement you made is hypocritical as you put your opinion just like every other +Support did. It’s your opinion that this isn’t a suggestion with a “steady” plan or that it doesn’t include solutions. The suggestion is about an issue with too many tactical departments, and it’s suggesting that roleplay would be better with a smaller amount of them on the server. I don’t know where you were trying to go with that but it just doesn’t change my opinion that some commanders won’t view this suggestion in an unbiased and would rather keep their ranks while it hurts the server.