th3

Not really a good reason to -support. A suggestion like this provokes discussion which isn't bad. Also there hasn't been any arguing just discussions about the merits of this suggestion. I think he should've substituted the word toxic for immaturity. I shouldn't have added a three letter abbreviation to the end of my response/statement given that you don't want to respond to a valid statement maturely to prove you deserve your rank, given your previous actions as State COL. I should have just phrased it like this. I don't think you would give up responsibility even if it was for the betterment of the server from what I have seen. But that was my fault for injecting my opinion into this discussion. Perhaps we can break down your -Support. Starting here. Of course not everyone would keep their ranks. Shrinking the amount of Tactical Units would directly correlate with people not keeping their Commander/Co Commander spots. As has been done in the past, I highly doubt they would not receive reserves or be prioritized for command positions that they would have to compete for but would be in a smaller pool of candidates due to their past experience. To answer your question about them joining another unit without the same abilities, I don't know what you mean. I don't think that people would be getting their equivalent command position but at the same time, more members in Tactical Units allows for diversification as the Original Poster Mentioned. Examples such as "Squads" which the OP went into more detail could more adequately be developed to allow for different groups within each Tactical Branch to really specialize and allow for more experimenting in terms of Roleplay. As for the Command members pouring their heart and soul, I understand the dedication that being the head of a Roleplaying branch takes. However, I don't think in the long run it will really matter given the ideas that have been discussed by the OP. One example of this could be a head of a department being removed due to their poor attitude and innapropriate conduct ingame or say on the forums. Their act of pouring their literal heart and soul wont matter then, and especially if they are given an opportunity due to their dedication to be placed in command positions after this proposed suggestion would be implemented. Yes they wouldn't most likely be high command anymore but they still aren't just walking away empty handed. He isn't talking about removing CERT. What he is suggesting is that there are too many Tactical Units who are revolving around the shooty shooty bang bang. This results in RP not happening due to the focus of a majority of Tactical Units on simply doing a TDM simulator with 3 minute timers. I don't think this example really helps considering the lax restrictions on the former jurisdictions rules which I do not know if they are still in effect given that I see that not followed when I am on. As for the last line in that quote I don't think that contributes anything to the discussion and is unnecessary. This is pointless to include. The original Poster needs to perhaps refine his suggestion as it isn't really that clear, this would be an issue if there was a merger which I don't think would be appropriate given the reasons listed above in this quote. As for the family bond, that can happen with any department with good leadership. Simply because there aren't a lot of TAC on most of the time doesn't really work. Timezones as you are certainly aware of will play havoc on people's activity. However, when there are 5 tactical units: CERT (For arguments sake), SWAT, SRT, ARU, Delta Squad, and a few "Secondary Tactical Units" that patrol. While its difficult to get a total count of members due to certain groups having private rosters, you could consider the low amount of members being correlated to the sheer amount of competing units. They also get on for meetings as well. The suggestion isn't to nerf Tactical Units. Its broadly stating that there are too many Tactical Units that inhibit any roleplay focused departments. An example of this could be BSI. Personally I think the issue was with the command members of that department. I personally doubt the objectivity of each person there especially if for theory's sake, their department was being hypothetically considered for removal. However, that's my opinion

So even if such a thing were to happen for the betterment of the server you wouldn't care. lol

I like how whenever a suggestion like this comes up, it always becomes someone else's fault for not roleplaying.

... perhaps be a little more specific to indicate what they should be able to whitelist to.

+Support More fun

My personal opinion is that you would be a great Senior Admin. What held you back previously was more than likely the names you had while on duty. This is not a good reason for someone to be promoted. I have seen people not be promoted for a long period of time and every time there was a reason that would cause issues if they were to be promoted. Something I appreciated in Senior Admins was the maturity they showed. If an Admin wasn't mature or goofed around too much I never really thought they were ready yet.

I know Snar. He doesn't do that crap so I really doubt you are telling the truth.

I really doubt you have any idea how long it takes for each suggestion to be considered completely.

Don't commit Tax Fraud

Having interacted with you during our time staffing together on SCPRP I feel I can respond to this with some sort of knowledge on how you act while staff. Abused his powers while Super Admin on SCPRP leading to him being given a choice of resigning or being demoted and never being Super Admin again. Your attitude when I recently interacted with you was also very bad. You had plenty of chances to not abuse the powers you had while staff previously and I don't think you have changed. Overall just -Support as Jeffe is someone who is not suited for staff after his fifth or sixth time being staff on Gaminglight.

L0L spammer get rekted

-Support Terrible attitude ingame

@Calamity

+Support You cannot take your own sits.

The weapon packs on the server are the ones that are used more than half life 2 weapons. This is because of the wider degree of customization compared to the other ones which inevitably require more work when it isn't needed.

-Support Not a suitable weapon to include for regular players.

Please quote me if you are directing something towards me or I won’t ever see it. To refer to your point of arguing I don’t consider responding to a report as arguing or what has been said up until this point as arguing. Please refer to the time stamps of each post and specifically what they are about because they hardly fit the definition of arguing.

Hate when Government raid you based off of shots fired outside of your house that you called the cops for.

Most of the time its just a terrible application, depending on the situation it could also be their attitude ingame/forums/discord. Or another possibility is that they could be staff restricted. Many things at least from my experience, I didn't want to put on their app due to the nature of it. However, I never had an issue with talking to a person about why their application was denied and giving them several tips on how to improve it for the next time depending on the waiting period.

It was not discarded. More than likely it was denied by an SMT member at the time. Also this policy is in place because after a year people who were in staff positions at the time would most likely not be there anymore and there would be no response to appeals like these when the staff member left the community.

Felix was a Super Admin. -Support You had plenty of time to appeal within 1 year. After 1 year passed you can no longer appeal bans.

-Support I do not think a map switch is appropriate. If it’s not broken then no need to make a complete change to a map that has been the centerpiece of SCPRP since December 2018.

When you get offended over someone calling you an asshole online

Just post it in "ACCEPTED" to be automatically accepted with no waiting period required

The video should show that all of them were involved in the raid, each one had no reason but followed along and FailRP'd. They are all responsible for metagaming as they didn't know the printers were there. They had every chance to understand that without the "drugs" they couldn't come up with a reason to raid a locked place.