th3

^^

Fixed?

Huh? I would say the information is more specifically helpful for COVID-19 instead of the flu to be honest.

I smell the doubt from a mile away. Most of the time the reason why a suggestion gets denied is because SMT tested it and determined that it couldn't fit into what the Server needs. Other reasons could be that it isn't something they think the server should get or if they already have something in mind. The most common reason is something else is already being added/removed/changed so its not beneficial to do an almost similar thing twice. Two stones, one bird.

I would say that being blacklisted has nothing to do with it as Voxis was not only Staff on PoliceRP but also staff on SCPRP after he was unblacklisted lmao. As for being fit for staff I would say Voxis has the needed maturity as well as drive to be staff especially since he was always thinking about ways to improve and offering thoughtful suggestions for both servers. Also his actual activity isn't based off the mere instance that you never saw him on the server, given that timezones/real life can determine when someone is on. To be honest it just seems like you are being rather ignorant with trying to hold these things against Voxis when they hold no merit. Perhaps people are holding grudges due to interdepartmental involvement from what I hear. Aren't you blacklisted? Thought your account would have already been banned. +Support Voxis is probably the most qualified for staff on PoliceRP out of all these applications so far. I can't speak for activity but I'm 100% sure he exceeds all other expectations. -Mature -Knows the rules -Knows how to handle staff sits and player complaints -Has an in-depth knowledge of the staff handbook and follows it to the letter -Literally one of the best staff members I had on SCPRP, would make a great JMT member.

I have staffed on and off since 2017. The amount of warnings I have issued are close to the 1,000 mark. If every single warning I ever issued that was appealed and accepted counted against me then I never would have made it to the rank I did make it to. In my opinion these warn appeals do not tell me anything about Will as I am not even looking at the ones outside of March given how far apart they are. My main issue is that yes the amount of appeals is relevant but the frequency is even more important when looking for issues such as abuse and other violations of the handbook. That doesn't tell us anything except Will is only human and several warnings he has issued have later been observed to be incorrect.

What you said is true but its an online community, I don't think it would be beneficial to have an age limit for staff.

This is something I think should be standard, with the only exception being obvious rule infractions which basically consists of rdm and nothing else a majority of the time.

The example you used was completely unrelated to the point I made and since you don't want to engage me in a reasonable discussion and instead ignore my points then that's fine. But if you don't want to do that then that's fine.

I'm not using anything to justify anyone's performance as a staff member. I'm using Covid-19 to perhaps give a credible reason for why the rise in the warns that are being appealed as players are on the server more since there are more stay at home orders as well as school being cancelled would result in more warnings and punishments being issued. Out of every warning issued by a staff member there will never be no mistakes made which would result in a higher amount being reported more recently. I would appreciate you not using the death of your father to further your argument. You won't see me use the death of a family member to further an argument on here and I would appreciate the same from you.

You can't hold this against him as staff have the choice to issue a verbal warning or an actual warning. -Support These warns are from December 8th, February 21, March 10, 23 hours ago, and 3 hours ago (This hasn't even been decided on). It would be more of an issue if these warnings were closer. But when they are spread over 4 months it isn't concerning, especially given the proximity of the recent warnings given the circumstances of COVID-19 keeping people indoors and more and more online.

It's a bug and if it doesn't come from SMT then I wouldn't trust it.

I have been in Gaminglight since 2017 and had enough of being staff for almost that whole time.

They have authorized nothing of the sort, and perhaps you are reading between the lines of something you have no business in. Let's quote the excerpt from their website. "The sculpture, its likeness, and the photograph have not been released under any Creative Commons license. Only the text of this article is released under Creative Commons. This sculpture and its likeness may not be used for commercial purposes under any circumstances. Izumi Kato has graciously chosen to allow the use of the image of "Untitled 2004" by the SCP Foundation and its fanbase for non-commercial purposes only." The distinction of what is authorized and what isn't is very important here. Izumi Kato has allowed the use of "Untitled 2004" for non-commercial purposes only. This begs the question of what license the image has and what the statue which is the relevant piece has as well. As for what license the image and statue has, well the excerpt answers that spot on. The statue is used by the SCP Foundation and its fanbase for non-commercial use only in accordance with CC-BY-SA 3.0. Now the question is would the use of SCP-173 as linked by you violate that? I would point out the issue with level's being available for purchase which guarantee the access of SCP-173. Again they haven't authorized anything as you show nothing of the sort that even begins to support your case except your words. I try not to be rude but when you are defending this and leaving out important details I feel like I need to deliver accurate information even if I have to be an asshole.

Just because the Wiki Licensing Team doesn't care that doesn't mean they are the ones holding the Copyright. The license that the Wiki uses is creative commons which means "Non-commercial use" only. This is the only way the image can be used with no exceptions, and from the best of my knowledge any use of "peanut" in the likeness of any image related to the Untitled 2004 created by Izumi Kato which SCP-173 is based off of. No exceptions as any likeness related to Untitled 2004 is only allowed via the image on the wiki and only used under the creative commons to avoid copyright issues.

Nah

Imagine enforcing this rule

I have those subscribed and I don’t have any issues. Maybe the problem is on your end instead of the servers.

I shoved a Humvee through them. They were removed for crashing the server/conflicting with addons so odds are it won't be added back anytime soon.

Hacking bans are not appealable. It would be a waste of resources to monitor you even if your appeal was accepted

+Support He obviously abused by banning him for saying the word "Nibba" as he just decided to say it in ooc directed at another person. Completely valid and he should be demoted for doing his job correctly. Lmao this is so sad. Alexa play Despacito. I was joking. -Support you were banned for a limited amount of time that honestly should be extended as you show no understanding or comprehension of your actions.

Then why say that? To be funny?

You also bypassed your ban and tell other SMT to kill themselves while spamming the N word on teamspeak. But just leave that out cause it totally doesn't matter.

It's been abused before, just don't get that many warns and you will be fine.

@Rookieblue