PandaInShitpostLand Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 What you want to see? - A change to D-Class cc's nlr. I would like to see D-Class nlr be based on the amount of gensec, mtf, and other cc's online. LIST: GENSEC ONLY 1-2 CC - 5 or less gensec. 90 sec nlr 1-2 CC - 5-10 Gensec 60 sec nlr 1-2 CC - 10-More Gensec 30 Sec NLR --------------------------------------------------------------- 3-4 CC'S - 5 or less gensec 120 sec nlr 3-4 CC - 5-10 Gensec 90 sec nlr 3-4 CC - 10-More Gensec 60 sec NLR -------------------------------------------------------------- 5-more CC - 5 or less gensec 180 sec/ 3 min nlr 5-more CC - 5-10 Gensec 150 sec nlr 5-more CC - 10-More Gensec 90 sec nlr WITH MTF SUPPORT: 1-2 CC - 5 or less Gensec+MTF Support 60 sec nlr 1-2 CC - 5-10 Gensec+MTF Support 30 sec nlr 1-2 CC - 10-More gensec+mtf support. No NLR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-4 CC - 5 or less Gensec+MTF Support 90 sec nlr 3-4 CC - 5-10 Gensec + MTF Support 60 sec nlr 3-4 CC - 10-More Gensec+MTF Suppport 30 Sec NLR ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5-More CC - 5 or less Gensec+MTF Support 150 Sec NLR 5-More CC - 5-10 Gensec+MTF Support 120 Sec NLR 5-More CC - 10-More Gensec+MTF Support 90 sec NLR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why should we add it? - Gives a more in depth system for NLR, Due to D-Class CC'S not being as powerful as they used to be and are only powerful in numbers, but still, well competent gensec can still take them out, Me and the other CC'S agree that the nerfs were due to incompetence. so i would like to see a simple buff to D-Class CC'S Until a way to make weapons/do things in D-Block is a thing What are the advantages of having this? - D-Class CC'S Will Have a funner time when there are barely any of them yet lots of gensec+mtf Who is it mainly for? - D-Class Links to any content - N/A The God Gamer of the Shitpost Squadron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kumandant Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 -Support Needlessly complicated and a blatant attempt to directly buff the dozens of Class-D custom classes by basically removing the purpose of their NLR. By the logic you presented, then why don't we also give Gensec a big o'l table like that, with their NLR based of how many non default D-Class are on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PandaInShitpostLand Posted November 29, 2019 Author Share Posted November 29, 2019 thats a good idea Just now, Panda0Playz said: thats a good idea at the same time, its also a nerf, if there are barely any gensec on yet alot of Custom classes, the have to wait even more time, giving the gensec time to regroup The God Gamer of the Shitpost Squadron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange 🍊 Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadAim Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 11 minutes ago, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. Retired Imperial RP Super Admin and Grand General Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych0 Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 2 hours ago, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PandaInShitpostLand Posted November 29, 2019 Author Share Posted November 29, 2019 Then maybe a change from 90 sec to 60 seconds would be nice due to the ever increasing gensec and mtf The God Gamer of the Shitpost Squadron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bread Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. lol, lmao even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catsro Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. SCPRP Head Admin | Ex SCPRP Event Team Leader | Ex CI LTCMDR | O5-13 Catsro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arussso Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. Aight I don't approve of this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
th3 Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 Overall extremely complicated and confusing to enforce. This would be terrible for staff and players. SCPRP Head of Staff Lead Discord Administrator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggo0 Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 2 hours ago, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. 17 minutes ago, th3 said: Overall extremely complicated and confusing to enforce. This would be terrible for staff and players. SCPRP Director of Logistics, Event Team | Former Nu7 2LT, Former Senior Admin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susel Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 (edited) 22 hours ago, Kumandant said: -Support Needlessly complicated and a blatant attempt to directly buff the dozens of Class-D custom classes by basically removing the purpose of their NLR. By the logic you presented, then why don't we also give Gensec a big o'l table like that, with their NLR based of how many non default D-Class are on! 20 hours ago, th3 said: Overall extremely complicated and confusing to enforce. This would be terrible for staff and players. If you want to make nlr shorter when more ppl are on foundation, we might as well make nlr shorter for mtf/gensec when more dclass/ci are on Edited November 30, 2019 by Susel Susel - Retired MTF person - "Teamwork makes the dream work" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fool Posted November 29, 2019 Share Posted November 29, 2019 -Support All reasons above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritz Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 -support 1. way too complicated, would practically add another page to scroll down through in the MOTD that only applies to a very small minority of the server 2. Would be irritating and difficult to enforce for staff 3. is not needed as d-class cc nlr is in an alright state at the moment Was Nu7 2LT Shot Once Was a Nu7 MSGT also was a CI Captain once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 10 hours ago, th3 said: Overall extremely complicated and confusing to enforce. This would be terrible for staff and players. This says it all. - Support Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangiatea Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 You expect us to all remember that? "A good soldier obeys without question. A good officer commands without doubt." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Rangiatea said: You expect us to all remember that? Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusFetus Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 16 hours ago, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Inaccurate Posted December 1, 2019 Share Posted December 1, 2019 On 11/29/2019 at 11:54 AM, Official Orange said: - Support This would be too complicated to follow and enforce. It would be a nightmare for staff to enforce this, let alone implement it., we already deal with enough NLR sits already... "Pay increase declined. Welcome to the Foundation, get used to it." -O5-6 3rd time Head of Medical Staff | Ex-Director of Research and Security | Ex-Director of Utility | Ex-Senior Admin for SCP-RP | Ex-Admin for TTT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted December 1, 2019 Share Posted December 1, 2019 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts