Jump to content

Jack (utility one)

Member
  • Posts

    918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Jack (utility one)

  1. no, I was simply stating what people think. What would you rather me do, lie to you and say people think CI and security is perfect and couldn't be better. Or list your faults or what people think are your faults and you work to fix them or to prove them wrong, to better your branch to where people can't possibly say anything against it. I don't believe CI is corrupt or anything of the matter all I was saying that is what people think. This is an issue because that is one of the factors with CI foundation relations. If you are offended by this I'm sorry but running from it would do no good. Like I said before honesty is the first step to recover from branch relations, as it can show what is good and what is bad so you can keep with the good and fix the bad. Creamey came to me trying to fix the bad of security and he, with the fellow security hcmd members, fixed it. I'm not saying it is an issue I was just using that as an example because that is what I hear the most.
  2. no no I don't mean that it's true. All I was saying is that's what many of people believe, just how CI and some people still believe security is still like it was a few months ago. All I was doing is making statements that what I feel both sides believe and was just clearing the air. To work together to fix these problems these branches have against one another they need to be honest with what they think is wrong with each other and I feel both statements I made from security and CI is accurate in which one believe in one another. If both branches are truly trying to fix the issues they have against each other lying or deceiving isn't going to cut it, so you have to be honest. Some people in the foundation branches believe CI are corrupt, I haven't seen this but I have heard this many of times. With security many people feel they are still the same security from a few months ago and are blinded by their own past view of gensec to see that they are changed, changing, or attempting to change. Again all I was doing was clearing the air for both sides on 1 topic I see the most, which in my opinion is the first step of recovery from this hate towards each other. I didn't mean any hate to either I was just making statements I feel both sides have towards one another and fellow people within the foundation towards CI, I wish I could speak more for CI but alas I wasn't in it for to long and for that I apologize.
  3. So yea cogs good job finally speaking about this. As a utility boy I've been blessed by not being totally thrusted into being into drama, that's one reason why I love utility so much. But as I have spread my horizon and ventured a little more to gensec, was apart of CI for a little, and now in E11 these drama outburst have been more frequent, or just came to light for me more often. What I think is people are still thinking gensec is the same gensec from past time. From 9 months ago from when I first joined, was ignored by gensec and MTF as a technician. As well as being as well ignored by security 5 months ago as a medic, as well as being literally harassed by gensec before. In my time at medical I've had multiple accounts of security harassing medics for 1 reason or another, BUT with this new hcmd I'm yet to receive 1 complaint and nothing but good remarks towards security. I have forgiven security for what they used to do as they have clearly changed, and as a medic I work the closest with security besides maybe research. If I can forgive them for literally harassing medics and myself at 1 point I think CI can and I think they can learn that they are not the gensec of old. Also there is a constant remark upon CI members, that one remark is that CI command is corrupt on the forums and in general. I can see how it can be perceived as this but I also believe that it is extremely over hyped. I feel if the HCMD from both branches come together to vent out their complaints then we can all work together for the betterment of the people this actually effect, the non-command members and low command members. I think to leave pettiness out of all conversation and to speak hard cold facts is the only way to repair this terribly broken relationship. I wish both sides the best of luck for repairing this bridge that has been melted away from the pure hate of each other and pettiness. I wish that this bridge can be rebuilt and improved by the command now and strengthened by command to come. Good Luck!
  4. +support Not asking for an amazing buff but one just enough to where the money spent on it feels equivalent in-game.
  5. +support Finally, the update looks hella fine. Hopefully this will boost Nu7 numbers to finally beat out CI
  6. this has been denied by the council of ketamine. You may r-apply never. Seriously tho you were an amazing friend and a even better medic. Can't wait to kill you still on jack when your in D-block helping out security. Can't wait to vibe with you as well on SAU. The best of luck to you and security :techthumbsup:
  7. +support 098 is a joke SCP tbh. As I said in a previous suggest I was a surgeon with a five seven and 1v1'd a 098. I won without taking a single lick of damage. This SCP is in need of a major buff and this seems very reasonable and well thought out.
  8. -support Please follow the format next time and do some research prior to submitting a suggestion.
  9. +support Adding armor to 682 would make it more realistic in a sense, making it regenerative would also be nice. On a old server I used to play on it had it to where armor did regenerate but sadly I have forgotten that addon (if it was one).
  10. the armor kit max is 100, the way armor is coded in garry's mod is much different then HP and can't be more, pretty sure. With buffing it to do 25 would be nice but idk if it can be done, if so I would love that.
  11. +/-support pretty sure it caused lag, also where would we put it?
  12. I mean already apparently on his list of things to eventually do.
  13. @Cogs bruh never even invited me AND NOT EVEN MAKING ME THE FLOWER GIRL. CMON MAN
  14. I'm making this is a suggestion to be added to the MOTD. I'm doing so because I feel this shouldn't be stated but it somehow does, as today before the MTF meeting CI were raiding. I thought that wasn't allowed so I stated that in OOC, I will provide screenshot at the end, other also stated that's what they thought as well. Boozle responded by saying yes they can, and then a shades added "says what rule.". I looked through the CI SOP and the MOTD for a rule stating this and to my surprise, there wasn't. I then took the initiative to make a suggestion to adding this rule in the MOTD as SOP's tend to change I feel this is a rule that shouldn't be removed, changed, or over all excluded in the future changing of the SOP.
  15. Like I said I don't care about the last 30min, if you read it thoroughly you would know this. I was also alt tabbed during the meeting and came back to an infill negeving our meeting, I did not know the context and for that I'm sorry. I also believe that MTF are in the wrong for that and will edit the suggestion accordingly to add that no in RP stuff shall be going on during a meeting. But I will also note that CI raiding exactly 14 minutes prior to the MTF meeting, in full knowledge that the MTF meeting was occurring within that time frame. That is what I'm mainly suggesting. I will edit the suggestion so instead of 30min before and after it will just be 30min before, and if that seems to outrageous just 20min before, nothing lower as RC'ing things, fighting CI, and dealing with possible D-class take a long time to deal with.
  16. What are you suggesting? - Requesting that MTF or CI can't raid 30 min before a meeting from the time of the designated meeting starting time. Also to add that NO in-game activities shall be taking place during said meeting as it is a out of character zone. How would this change better the server? - I already thought this was a rule in place but apparently it isn't so that's why I'm making this suggestion. Also I wish to note that I'm not suggestion CI can't raid on their meeting day, I'm suggesting that they can't raid while the MTF meeting is taking place. While the reason why is because 1. During meetings that is when the most important information is being givin and it would just destroy the flow of the meeting, the concentration the command members as they are giving important information and the enlisted for receiving the information. 2. It is extremely rude and WILL cause arguments in chat and hate towards one another and that's not right. NOTE, This will go both ways. Also to clarify I wish for this new rule to be added to the MOTD. Also I may add Security to the mix but I don't think it's absolutely needed, will edit to add them if requested. Also as I was writing this a CI infil decided to shoot up the MTF meeting video- https://medal.tv/clips/28925737/d1337fimsLTz Screenshots of BLOGS of the infil shooting up the meeting- https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171793025 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171793243 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171793405 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171793526 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171793706 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171793883 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171794041 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171794165 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2171794303 Note- I'm keeping the videos in not as a reason to use for this suggestion, but as an example of what could happen in the future. This can also go both ways so CI members please remember this. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - No, besides making it so where CI can't raid for around 30min and same as MTF while the CI/MTF meeting are in place 30min before and after. Who would this change mostly benefit? - MTF and CI. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - Nope
  17. ACCEPTED! Go to a medical HCMD member for your whitelist.
  18. ACCEPTED! Go to a medical HCMD member for your whitelist.
  19. -support When I see you on the server you were pretty chill and respectful. Your app is pretty good, but your not to active any more. If you still had that same activity as before I would totally +support this but activity is extremely important for being a staff member.
  20. +support Maxi is a good friend and will always be. Pretty good app, but you NNEEEEEDDDD to read those guidelines asap. Besides that everything is looking really good. Hopefully you get it
×
×
  • Create New...