Rookieblue

@Dang

Denied It's a staff member's discretion whether to issue a written or verbal warning. Based on the player's admission that the warning is valid, this appeal is denied.

Denied Due to my emergency leave I'm just now getting to be able to render a final decision here. While I do not find evidence to support a LTAP ban being issued based on no staff action had taken place to bring the player into a sit, multiple prop based offenses would warrant a ban length of three days. As such, this appeal is denied.

Denied Appeal incomplete, no evidence provided.

Accepted Thank you for the report. Appropriate action against the player and or staff member will be taken to ensure that they receive the correct punishment.

Normally, this would not meet my threshold for a branch disrespect warning. However, given the totality of the circumstances, including a prior warning for branch disrespect (meaning there is a history of this type of conduct), as well as his past history on GENSEC, I will be accepting this report and issuing the player a warning.

@Rektify And you confirmed that is was a disconnect rather than a time out?

Appeal being handled in another topic actually posted by the individual banned.

@th3 After issueing the warning had you attempted to bring the person to a sit, TP to their position, or planned to issue a jail time of some sort prior to the individual disconnecting?

Accepted Thank you for the report. Based on the evidence and testimony provided, this player will receive a formal warning for FailRP - TP'ing through open ground as 106. SCP 106, by MOTD and by lore, is able to phase through solid objects. He does this (in lore) by entering into a pocket dimension and then exiting the pocket dimension on the other side. Had these stairs been fully solid, rather than having significant open space between them, this would have been an acceptable use of 106's SWEP. On the second complaint of body blocking, the player in question TP'd up, which led to him running into you. I do not believe this was intentional, and as such is being disregarded.

Denied The combat in question was over, the player retreated and closed a door to his location. This does not constitute an active shootout, and therefor is not combat healing.

Accepted Thank you for the report. Based on the evidence provided this player has received a warning for FailRP - Having a Weapon as 343.

Accepted Thank you for the report. Based on the evidence and testimony provided, as well as the lack of documented NLR violations in the past, this player is receiving a verbal warning. Further misconduct will result in additional consequences.

Accepted To have your warn removed, go to the "Bans" Section at the top of the forums, navigate to your profile, find the warning for this appeal, and for the reason on the appeal, link this post.

Accepted! To have your warn removed, go to the "Bans" Section at the top of the forums, navigate to your profile, find the warning for this appeal, and for the reason on the appeal, link this post.

Igneous made an oopsie and fixed it.

Did you follow the instructions on the ban appeal and appeal it on the ban panel? Maybe next time DM a SMT member instead of just posting something in general so you can actually get help? Or use the ban support function on the main GL discord?

In my opinion, if a spawn needs to be set, set the spawn. Just make sure you're setting it at the correct location.

This is more of a GENSEC command suggestion that could take place in their discord, rather than a server wide suggestion. This could easily be implemented in the GENSEC discord in the introduction of a channel if GENSEC command wants to do it.

Is this rule written somewhere? I ask because I'm 99% sure it's not in the MOTD and I rarely deal with CC stuff.

What does ACM stand for? To many acronyms. Personally I don't have a problem with allowing CI to roll to lockdown Medbay, all it does is trap them inside Medbay. I do have a problem with allowing D-Class to mess with the Medbay lockdown though, because that'll lead to people locking it down to minge and then respawning to leave it locked.

+ Support Easy change I can make.

So you just lied in your appeal application is what we've all discovered.

Looking at your warning jacket: 05/28/2018 00:40:13 - MilitaryRP - Synr.gg | Reborn - Racism / LTAP 11/24/2019 07:03:02 - SCP - Fuhrious George - racism x1 LTAPx1 This was brought to my attention after you were the subject of a player report, which you were guilty of multiple RDM and NLR violations. Generally, high level offenses such as racism, homophobia, sexism, etc, are dealt with on a one strike system. As you have two warnings for racist behavior across the community I made the decision to enforce the permanent ban laid out in the staff handbook.

Oh lordy that was an adventure