Jump to content

Rookieblue

Retired Staff
  • Posts

    2,231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by Rookieblue

  1. Skela, you're fired. Rainbow, you're hired.
  2. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  3. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  4. DENIED Thank you for taking the time to apply for a position with the Forum Diplomat Corps, however your application had not been accepted. This may be due to observations of the Senior Management Team of your server, feedback from fellow staff members, or other reasons. Please feel free to reapply on the next round of applications if you remain interested!
  5. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  6. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  7. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  8. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  9. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  10. ACCEPTED Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomat Corps, I'm please to accept your application! Please reach out to me via discord to conduct your onboarding into the team. If you haven't already, please also read and reply with your understanding to the Forum Diplomat Handbook.
  11. DENIED Thank you for taking the time to apply for a position with the Forum Diplomat Corps, however your application had not been accepted. This may be due to observations of the Senior Management Team of your server, feedback from fellow staff member, or other reasons. Please feel free to reapply on the next round of applications if you remain interested!
  12. Moved to correct location. Also, -support
  13. @Mini Stavy Fix your post to follow the format please.
  14. ACCEPTED Based on the evidence and testimony provided, this player report has been accepted. The player will receive a formal warning for violation of FailRP - Maynard Rules Violation, and referred to CI command for further action. The main point of contention in this report was not that this player killed numerous D-Class, but whether him doing so fell within acceptable Roleplaying. The player in question argued that he was taking planned actions to prevent other research staff from obtaining D-Class to conduct tests and prevent SCP breaches, as well as encourage rioting in D-Block to impact GENSEC's ability to respond to other locations in the facility, which does fall within Doctor Maynard's scope as a spy. However, taking such actions in full view of GENSEC and research personnel in the most populated area of the server violates Doctor Maynard's intention of being a spy. Specifically, the Maynard rule I'm referring to is, "Dr. Maynard should work with and coordinate with the CI. He should never do anything spontaneous or outrageous and should always be secretive." While in this case the action was not spontaneous, it was indeed both outrageous and overt, violating the last two provisions. I am not concerned with whether or not you had the consent to kill the D-Class, as it does not matter whether they file a report or not for action to be taken for violation of server rules. No where in the MOTD, nor the staff handbook does it say that staff much wait for a report to be made to take action when they view a rule violation. This is intentional, as some players may not know how to report rule violations, or have some fear of doing so. As such, even if you have consent to kill the D-Class, unless you have an RP reason to do so, it would still constitute RDM or FailRP. Additionally, the player's argument that as a level 4 personnel he has the in-lore capability to KOS any D-Class for any reason is uncompelling. While the server attempts to be as lore friendly as possible, certain rules and understandings of restrictions have to be in place for the betterment of all on the server. For example, O5 personnel are routinely on site in the Foundation during DEFCON 3 and 2 situations, when they would not be on site in the first place if there were any sort of indication of something going wrong. E11 personnel would have a response time of minutes to respond to the Foundation when things start to go bad, rather than a response time of seconds. CI would not be able to have an underground base within eye sight of the secret Foundation Site. While Doctor Maynard may be a ranking Foundation staff member with loyalty to CI, that does not give him the excuse to violate the MOTD rules that encompass every other branch regarding needing an RP reason to kill D-Class. Even D-Class are bound by this rule, only permitted to attack each other without reprisal in the designated D-Block Fight Club.
  15. So to clarify for my own understanding, this player as Maynard was preventing other D-Class from being tested on by killing them?
  16. Let me quote a couple MOTD rules at you: 1) Do not kill without an RP reason, this is considered random death match (RDM). 2) Do not do FailRP, which is doing things that would be unrealistic, or not consistent with what your character would do. This includes failing to follow orders from those who outrank you, failing to comply with a department SOP, or failing to follow job specific rules. Literally rules number 1 and 2. I'm unlocking this so @[GL] Jack I the One & Only can provide his side of the story. Consider this a warning, any toxicity or argumentative comments will immediately be hidden and forum warnings handed out without question.
  17. Well, I mean you laid it out pretty well. Maynard can't randomly kill D-Class for no reason. While Maynard is a hybrid CI-Foundation job, he needs a RP reason to call a KOS/AOS, just like everyone else. Sounds like you should be making a player report for MRDM, rather than a suggestion.
  18. Aren't there literally two jail cells in upper D-Block?
  19. If something hasn't been added into the MOTD it should be a bug report, not a second suggestion. I've moved this to the correct location, and reached out to Igneous on what portions of this suggestion were to be implemented. On a side note, don't make suggestions with multiple parts. It makes everything more confusing for everyone, especially if only part of a suggestion is accepted.
  20. Honestly I like this idea. It gives Nu7 something to do when SCPs are contained and there isn't anything else going on.
  21. 53 warnings on PoliceRP, 23 warnings on MilitaryRP, permanently banned from SCPRP/MilitaryRP/PoliceRP/CloneWarsRP, fun offenses such as breaching personal information of other players, impersonating others, dozens of staff/player disrespects, and a litany of FailRPs. Frankly I'm surprised you don't have a community blacklist.
  22. Accepted Thank you for the report. Appropriate action against the player and or staff member will be taken to ensure that they receive the correct punishment.
  23. Denied Enjoy your community blacklist and forum ban!
  24. I'll do you one better bud, how about the openly gay Head Admin of this server handles your appeal personally?
×
×
  • Create New...