Orange 🍊 Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 Your in game name: Orange Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:121830468 The player's in game name: Susel The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_0:1:51062510 What did the player do: Explicitly say he was teaming with SCP's Evidence (required):https://gyazo.com/d9d18e290844589411f4cf3f9feb0ae1https://gyazo.com/464c9d3689520969fe8e1db8bee952ca What do you believe should happen to the player: A warn Any extra information: This happened yesterday, we assumed that 682 had just killed Nimo (Who was handcuffed inside our base) as 682 is to kill anyone, and we were confused why Nimo was saying he escaped we just assumed he was lying, I check discord when I wake up and see that Susel is "bragging" about how he saved Nimo by teaming with 682. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 682 is a hostile SCP, meaning per the MOTD he is required to attack all humans he runs across, making deals and teaming with people are not allowed. Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIKEN Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 +support Admitted to breaking rules Evidence is clear Teaming with SCPS is against MOTD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manager Nimo Posted July 13, 2019 Manager Share Posted July 13, 2019 +/- Support He may have teamed with SCP 682 but I'm thinking if Susel gets warned 682 should also get a warn because he was the one that agrreed to it and proceded with the "deal" and Susel has no way of controlling how 682 was thinking 〖 PoliceRP 〗Senior Management Team | Manager 〖 Lead Account Manager 〗 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange 🍊 Posted July 13, 2019 Author Share Posted July 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, Nimo said: +/- Support He may have teamed with SCP 682 but I'm thinking if Susel gets warned 682 should also get a warn because he was the one that agrreed to it and proceded with the "deal" and Susel has no way of controlling how 682 was thinking I agree, but I have know idea who the 682 was, it may be possible to find it in logs idk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susel Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 (edited) Ok, now let me explain myself. At that time when I freed 682, I was playing as the stealth operative and I was completly invisble, which made me pretty much immune to 682. Thats why when I freed him he didn't kill me. I was using the stealth operative job all the time for more than 1 hour. I simply sneaked into bunker while being invisble when someone opened the door, I went to the R&D room (even tho some CI were targetting me) and freed 682. That's how everything went. I don't know if this is enough, but I'm just saying I didn't break any rules at that time. I do not know what happened from Nimo's point of view, if he was able to sneak out and 682 didn't see him or if 682 really just didn't kill him. I actually though 682 just wouldn't care and kill Nimo, but he decided to leave Nimo alive. Edited July 13, 2019 by SuselMaks 1 Susel - Retired MTF person - "Teamwork makes the dream work" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIKEN Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 53 minutes ago, SuselMaks said: Ok, now let me explain myself. At that time when I freed 682, I was playing as the stealth operative and I was completly invisble, which made me pretty much immune to 682. Thats why when I freed him he didn't kill me. I was using the stealth operative job all the time for more than 1 hour. I simply sneaked into bunker while being invisble when someone opened the door, I went to the R&D room (even tho some CI were targetting me) and freed 682. That's how everything went. I don't know if this is enough, but I'm just saying I didn't break any rules at that time. I do not know what happened from Nimo's point of view, if he was able to sneak out and 682 didn't see him or if 682 really just didn't kill him. I actually though 682 just wouldn't care and kill Nimo, but he decided to leave Nimo alive. You missed the part where you talked to 682 and made a deal that if you freed him he would not kill nimo or you and just kill CI..... You stated all this in the discord screenshot. Or are you saying you were lying about what you said in discord? This is where you broke failrp and the rule about teaming with SCPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyDudeFive Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 I believe that 682 was more in the wrong here but he shouldn't have tried to make a deal with 682 knowing that he will kill everything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skela Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 Massive + Support one you bragged about it. Nuff said. Yuh imm@ Thash Dat B¡tch!!*^€{ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[icOnic] BonkBoeink Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 +Support. He was FailRPing. -OG Minge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trae Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 4 hours ago, Skela said: Massive + Support one you bragged about it. Nuff said. Change da world, my final message goodb ye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
October Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 + support, You shouldn’t do this. You can’t make deals with SCP’s. You could argue that yes you were cloaked, but it’s still not allowed. Just no teaming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breen Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 9 hours ago, CHIKEN said: +support Admitted to breaking rules Evidence is clear Teaming with SCPS is against MOTD 8 hours ago, Nimo said: +/- Support He may have teamed with SCP 682 but I'm thinking if Susel gets warned 682 should also get a warn because he was the one that agrreed to it and proceded with the "deal" and Susel has no way of controlling how 682 was thinking 7 hours ago, CHIKEN said: You missed the part where you talked to 682 and made a deal that if you freed him he would not kill nimo or you and just kill CI..... You stated all this in the discord screenshot. Or are you saying you were lying about what you said in discord? This is where you broke failrp and the rule about teaming with SCPS. gog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ vσxιs ~ Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 +SUPPORT FailRP at it's finest. Bragging got you caught. Case is open and shut just like that. “The only way that we can live is if we grow. The only way we can grow is if we change. The only way we can change is if we learn. The only way we can learn is if we are exposed. And the only way that we are exposed is if we throw ourselves into the open.” — C. Joybell || Proud Member of GamingLight since March 2018 || || Former MTF Alpha-1 MAJ || Former NSA Director || Former MTF E-11 CPL || Former SWAT CMDR || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hoovy Posted July 14, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted July 14, 2019 +Support 5 Former SCP:RP Event Team Leader (5/15/19 - 12/31/19) Current SCP:RP Head Administrator "I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fear Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 12 hours ago, Hoovy said: +Support should we add more memes to this? oh and uh +support btw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackJesus6996 Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 (edited) 13 hours ago, Hoovy said: +Support +support Admitted to breaking rules Evidence is clear Teaming with SCPS is against MOTD Edited July 14, 2019 by BlackJesus6996 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manager Nimo Posted July 14, 2019 Manager Share Posted July 14, 2019 Guys stop with the unrelated posts 1 〖 PoliceRP 〗Senior Management Team | Manager 〖 Lead Account Manager 〗 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catsro Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 14 hours ago, Hoovy said: +Support SCPRP Head Admin | Ex SCPRP Event Team Leader | Ex CI LTCMDR | O5-13 Catsro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 2:36 AM, Hoovy said: +Support + Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
th3 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 Accepted Thank you for the report. Appropriate action against the player and or staff member will be taken to ensure that they receive the correct punishment. SCPRP Head of Staff Lead Discord Administrator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts