Ramen Rug Soup csgolive.com Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 Your In-Game Name: SenapiRamen UMC Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:181739718 Staff member's In-Game Name: Pull What did they do?: False Warned Me 2 Times One Was For Muting Him (ClientSide) After The Sit Was Over and The Other Was For RDM Because My Hostage Was Minging I Killed Him And No Rule Says You Can't Do That. Evidence (REQUIRED): Check My Warns What do you think is an acceptable punishment? 2 Strikes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cole B Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 +Support only 1 strike is needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramen Rug Soup csgolive.com Posted October 8, 2018 Author Share Posted October 8, 2018 ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghosted Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 32 minutes ago, Cole B. said: +Support only 1 strike is needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakeee Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 -Support You RDM'd your hostage because you "Didn't want him anymore", Not all rules are stated in the MOTD but it is common sense that killing a hostage for no reason is RDM. I would have classed it as RDM as he was in restraints and had no way of defending himself. To my knowledge you did not bring the fact that your hostage was minging in the sit. You could have let him go. Your warn for Not Complying With staff is due to the fact you muted Pull whilst in a sit, wether or not you had received you initial warn, Pull still needed to speak to you and you stated that you had muted him therefore he could not conclude the sit, therefor that warn is also justified. PoliceRP|Moderator|Support SM Jakeee 1B65 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Tucker Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 4 minutes ago, Jakeee said: -Support You RDM'd your hostage because you "Didn't want him anymore", Not all rules are stated in the MOTD but it is common sense that killing a hostage for no reason is RDM. I would have classed it as RDM as he was in restraints and had no way of defending himself. To my knowledge you did not bring the fact that your hostage was minging in the sit. You could have let him go. Your warn for Not Complying With staff is due to the fact you muted Pull whilst in a sit, wether or not you had received you initial warn, Pull still needed to speak to you and you stated that you had muted him therefore he could not conclude the sit, therefor that warn is also justified. Completely agree. Both warns are valid in my eyes. Jason Tucker If any of you think that a post i made is offensive, wrong, or just plainly don't like it. please contact me within the websites messaging system as I will take care of that post. Thank You. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramen Rug Soup csgolive.com Posted October 8, 2018 Author Share Posted October 8, 2018 its not cause i didnt want him he was minging and breaking out of cuffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cole B Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 36 minutes ago, Jakeee said: -Support You RDM'd your hostage because you "Didn't want him anymore", Not all rules are stated in the MOTD but it is common sense that killing a hostage for no reason is RDM. I would have classed it as RDM as he was in restraints and had no way of defending himself. To my knowledge you did not bring the fact that your hostage was minging in the sit. You could have let him go. Your warn for Not Complying With staff is due to the fact you muted Pull whilst in a sit, wether or not you had received you initial warn, Pull still needed to speak to you and you stated that you had muted him therefore he could not conclude the sit, therefor that warn is also justified. Changed to a - support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramen Rug Soup csgolive.com Posted October 8, 2018 Author Share Posted October 8, 2018 Why? lol its the moderator that helped him lol the guy named jake defending ahhahahah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cole B Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 (edited) I just think you should appeal the warns which you should but he should not be punished Because I would warn u for the same things Edited October 8, 2018 by Cole B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taco. Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 (edited) -support Evidence?? Edited October 8, 2018 by [GL]DontTouchMyTaco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramen Rug Soup csgolive.com Posted October 8, 2018 Author Share Posted October 8, 2018 check the warns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyGuy Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 @Officer PulloutskiPulloutski We need your side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steakhouse guy Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 1 hour ago, Jakeee said: -Support You RDM'd your hostage because you "Didn't want him anymore", Not all rules are stated in the MOTD but it is common sense that killing a hostage for no reason is RDM. I would have classed it as RDM as he was in restraints and had no way of defending himself. To my knowledge you did not bring the fact that your hostage was minging in the sit. You could have let him go. Your warn for Not Complying With staff is due to the fact you muted Pull whilst in a sit, wether or not you had received you initial warn, Pull still needed to speak to you and you stated that you had muted him therefore he could not conclude the sit, therefor that warn is also justified. MilitaryRP Trial Mod|CERT/Trooper SGT|PD SM “Success is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm.” ~Winston Churchill “The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step.” ~Lao Tzu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cole Phelps Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 -Support - "Check my warns" is not evidence - Reasons Above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooplaa Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 5 minutes ago, Cole Phelps said: -Support - "Check my warns" is not evidence - Reasons Above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WreckedInRuinz Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 -support If your gonna make a staff report get evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil pump4663 Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 - support this guy has been a a big minge today + no proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] My Pet named Steve Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 6 hours ago, Jakeee said: -Support You RDM'd your hostage because you "Didn't want him anymore", Not all rules are stated in the MOTD but it is common sense that killing a hostage for no reason is RDM. I would have classed it as RDM as he was in restraints and had no way of defending himself. To my knowledge you did not bring the fact that your hostage was minging in the sit. You could have let him go. Your warn for Not Complying With staff is due to the fact you muted Pull whilst in a sit, wether or not you had received you initial warn, Pull still needed to speak to you and you stated that you had muted him therefore he could not conclude the sit, therefor that warn is also justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalrusFace Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 4 hours ago, Jakeee said: -Support You RDM'd your hostage because you "Didn't want him anymore", Not all rules are stated in the MOTD but it is common sense that killing a hostage for no reason is RDM. I would have classed it as RDM as he was in restraints and had no way of defending himself. To my knowledge you did not bring the fact that your hostage was minging in the sit. You could have let him go. Your warn for Not Complying With staff is due to the fact you muted Pull whilst in a sit, wether or not you had received you initial warn, Pull still needed to speak to you and you stated that you had muted him therefore he could not conclude the sit, therefor that warn is also justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 -Support -No Evidence PoliceRP Manager Retired SRT Commander | Police Commissioner | Department Supervisor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrycE ? Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 -SUPPORT He clearly warned you 5 minutes later. If he warned you for breaking a rule, then you disrespect him, then yes, he can and might warn you for it. Provide evidence next time if you want anyone to even consider this. https://gyazo.com/fa1fb5971ad454b9fffdd6ee592dfdc8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 - Support Reasons stayed above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fame Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Denied Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts