th3

-Support I do not believe this suggestion deals with the issue at hand, which is that Custom Classes routinely in the past and possibly have continued to bypass SOP rules and restrictions for the branch that they paid to be a part of in their own custom class which is their particular "fantasy" or perhaps their preferred way to roleplay on the server. A better way to change this is through Rookieblue's suggestion which you can find earlier above. Increased communication to clearly establish the expectations and rules that a Custom Class must follow when participating in roleplay as a Security, MTF, CI, etc Custom Class to ensure that mishaps can be quickly dealt with while avoiding the excuse of "I didn't read the SOP so I didn't know" excuse or disregarding specific branches SOP's in favor of the less restrictive MOTD at times. These Security Custom Class Owners specifically indicated they wanted their class to be considered Security. This entails following their SOP and MOTD rules in tandem which several posters above commented on examples of that not happening, which is why I talked about Rookieblue's suggestion as being more able to address the issue people raised in this thread. Changing their NLR timer does nothing but punish them for paying for a different experience than MTF, or CI which have to follow their branches SOP and MOTD rules with no distinction or special/detrimental treatment (I might be wrong about that, if I am then sorry). This is getting long winded but tl;dr. I don't think this suggestion addresses the issue with Security CC's and punishing them for not indicating MTF by treating them differently than other Gensec is not the solution. Please refer to Rookieblue's post if you need to clarify what I meant in most of this. Edit: If D class CC's had to pay an additional $50 then perhaps they should get the same nlr as normal d class.

Finally something to use my 1.7 billion on

It's not advisable to immediately revert changes until they have had a chance to impact the flow of gameplay in them. One day is not enough to warrant a suggestion to basically revert back.

-support not feasibly possible, unnecessary, over complicated, and has been denied in the past. Forum diplomats can do everything you would need them to do and I’m certain wouldn’t mind helping.

This should be accepted and the ban extended

Buttons

The focus of my comment was on the evidence provided by Cancer in the report, not what you said in response. Proof provided by Cancer only shows you in rp and him asking about sits which doesn't establish that you were actively refusing to take sits (Which is why I -supported this) and what this report would most likely have needed to actually be accepted in my opinion. I never said you were using roleplay as an excuse not to claim sits. Several responses to this report were implying that because of certain characters having certain types of roleplay it could be excused as to why a staff member would not be doing their job. Also having been a part of staff for a long time I have never missed a sit popping up when I was engaged in combat.

-support The evidence provided does not show him actively refusing to take sits. A video would be better to catch stuff like that because screenshots don't do much. Also something that perhaps should be clarified is that it doesn't matter what sort of rp a staff member is in, or how difficult it is to do rp as a certain character. Anything related to "being in rp" can't be held up as to why they failed to do their job.

They left immediately after I issued the warning before it would have been possible for me to bring them to an admin room. I also resorted to a ban because of his previous warnings which told me it wasn’t his first or second time minging with props.

count me in but if I win I'm donating the money to charity

Was at work before but basically here is what happened. I was cloaked watching d block after causing chaos for security I took a break as there were a lot of D class Custom classes so I figured they had a chance without extra aid. I see 3 giant cube props get spawned in in a cluster of d class, and immediately they disappear. I saw the name of the person who spawned them in but figured it was a "mistake" and didn't do anything. During this time there were no rdm sits being called and the only issue seemed to be prop minging. I then saw him spawn the same 3 cubes along with an airplane before immediately removing them. Since I identified who it was I knew it was being done on purpose and since there were no staff sits being called about the supposed rdmer he allegedly was trying to stop I issued a warning for prop minging. He immediately disconnected after I issued the warning and having checked I knew he had a total of 3 warns for prop minging so he knew what not to do with props but still did it. I decided to ban him for 3 days because of the 3 prop minge warnings along with the instantaneous dc.

The fact that he immediately left after being punished simply factored into me banning him for 3 days to reflect the previous punishments he had received (The three prop minging warns). I'm not trying to imply he only got banned because he disconnected as he still was going to get banned regardless. The cubes were massive and he spawned three of them in a row, twice. This to me establishes that it was not a misclick after he did it for the second time after I chose to not punish him for the first time. He also spawned an airplane prop during the second time which is the instance that I chose to punish him for. I have since blacklisted the massive cube to ensure it doesn't happen again in the future.

Was at work before but basically here is what happened. I was cloaked watching d block after causing chaos for security I took a break as there were a lot of D class Custom classes so I figured they had a chance without extra aid. I see 3 giant cube props get spawned in in a cluster of d class, and immediately they disappear. I saw the name of the person who spawned them in but figured it was a "mistake" and didn't do anything. During this time there were no rdm sits being called and the only issue seemed to be prop minging. I then saw him spawn the same 3 cubes along with an airplane before immediately removing them. Since I identified who it was I knew it was being done on purpose and since there were no staff sits being called about the supposed rdmer he allegedly was trying to stop I issued a warning for prop minging. He immediately disconnected after I issued the warning and having checked I knew he had a total of 3 warns for prop minging so he knew what not to do with props but still did it. I decided to ban him for 3 days because of the 3 prop minge warnings along with the instantaneous dc.

+Support SMT aren't always on

I was not positive because I do not handle player reports as I am not staff anymore. I referred to the MOTD because I knew two things, Rookie has helped update it multiple times and I had not checked it recently which is why I said I referred back to it

After looking at the video provided I referred to the MOTD found here and given that 106's description only says "Doors and Walls" I told Kilo I thought it was failrp. Running into someone can't be them bodyblocking you but if you were running into them because they failrp'd then I would say including that in a report makes sense. +Support FailRP

A ban is too harsh

The reason why they only have 1 seat is because the server doesn't have a vehicle system such as vcmod or simphys which I assume is what MilRP is currently using

Nice rep lmao execute order 66

What you want to see? - Remove the Humvee Why should we remove it? - It is unused and very useless What are the advantages of removing this? - Well its not being used so it would be good to remove it Who is it mainly for? - The server Links to any content -

This would apply for custom donations as the !donate command ingame shows the packages you purchased for the server

^^^^^

I just imagined different color d class jumpsuits for a parade

-/+ Support I agree with Hoovy

You have no idea what you are talking about, especially calling Rang salty which is as funny as it is incorrect. -/+ Support You are a pretty good guy but you also were staff restricted 4 days ago which I don't think is enough time.