Zombinator Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 What are you suggesting? - Changing CI raiding rules from requiring 5 Foundation combatants to requiring two Foundation combatants for every one CI raider. How would this change better the server? - Balancing combat would provide for more tense battles and limiting overwhelming odds would promote research roleplay. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - co won't be able to raid with 15 members versus 5 Foundation. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Researchers, GENSEC and Nu7. 2 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Its Buck Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -Support No The raid system is perfectly fine and this would be way to annoying for CI, it would also decrease activity for them RETIRED SCP-RP:Delta-5 CPT | Deputy Head G9| Medical DHFW Doctor. | E11 1LT | Head Ranger | D4 Vanguard FF5 | RnD EOI V3 Canibal ImperialRP: MC 1LT Bacon 3817 | DT SGT FF5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -SUPPORT My reasons for this is because something like this can also happen to CI, not just to the Foundation. 5 CI members versus 15 Foundation members. And I believe that CI cannot even interfere with Researchers doing tests anymore. Personally, I would just leave this alone. There are times where CI is active when MTF is not, and then there are times when MTF is active and CI is not. You also have to think about D-Classes that want to become CI, but cannot due to a rule like this being applied. D-Classes are already too weak with 100% health to do anything to large amounts of MTF with 200% health and 200% armor. And during active times, it is 99% impossible to escape as a D-Class without assistance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Twix Bar Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 (edited) -Support Above reasons, and... It would put CI at more of a detriment during raids. The raiders already only have one life, why force them to have to kill double the amount of combatants than they have? Edited July 28, 2021 by Right Twix Bar Current: None Former: Security Sergeant Major (and SFC), Director of Logistics, Alpha-1 Private First Class, CI Mil Private First Class (and E4 C6), Nu7 Lance Corporal, CI RnD Supervisory Agent (and EOI F3) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoID Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 “Balancing Combat” suggestion concept contradicts that entirely -Support, I don’t even need to say much else. With Best Regards,CI R&D Deputy Director Of Operations|| - Retired SCP-RP Event Team Leader || Retired SCP-RP Admin || -Retired CI R&D Head of Research|| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Apple Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 15 minutes ago, NeoID said: “Balancing Combat” suggestion concept contradicts that entirely -Support, I don’t even need to say much else. [Just Apple I Suppose] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pills Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 16 minutes ago, NeoID said: “Balancing Combat” suggestion concept contradicts that entirely -Support, I don’t even need to say much else. Former: 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 - 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuz L0g1c Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 21 minutes ago, Right Twix Bar said: -Support Above reasons, and... It would put CI at more of a detriment during raids. The raiders already only have one life, why force them to have to kill double the amount of combatants than they have? W̵̠̽O̶̤̐̎͠R̷̨̯͇̘̓̓̐̚Ķ̶̨͙̌͗͋̐ ̷͎̻͈͘H̵̦̝̅́͝Ä̶̱̽R̷̔͊̀͜͠D̷̲̠̱͛͘ ̵̹̞͖͍̽͂Í̶̛̠́̎ͅÑ̶̟͈ ̸̭̖̋̀S̸̞̯͔̈́̍̈̽͜I̵̞̹̓͌̈́Ḹ̴͕̤̠̃Ë̶̘́͑Ṋ̵̰̞̀̏̄́C̸̼̱̏̑Ě̸͕̕͝ ̸͚͊͐͘Á̵̩̂̃N̶̩̦̈́Ḑ̷̲̣͐͐ ̷̨̣͇̄L̴̢̳̰̀̃E̸̙͗̏̕T̵̜́͛̿ ̴̝̯̠̐̇́S̸̠̣͋̆U̶̳̖̹̐C̶͙̩̽C̶̩̻̍̕E̷͈͖̓̈S̴͖͎̆͒͆͜S̸̥̞̗̠̀͌ ̶̫̩̬͂͛͝M̵͇̗͙͗͝͝A̶̛̬̦̾̿K̴̨̙̍ͅͅE̴̠͇̮͐͗́ ̵̳̲̅͑͝T̴͙͙̀̈́ͅH̶̢̎͛̈́̿E̴͈͖̹̔̂͝ ̴̹̯͓̂̈́N̶̦͌͒̔̎Ȍ̸̘͝I̴̭̠̅ͅS̸̭̼͋̕Ë̵́ A̵̙̥̭̠̓̅̎͘͝ͅ1̵̢̙̲̰̦̞͆͊ ̴̝̏́͑͂͝N̴̨͊̍o̸̖̦̬̅̑̇̍͠m̶̖̃a̸͉̤̜̪̘͑͌͝ḑ̶̘̣̬͇̈́ ̵͈̤̪͇̉͋̓̾Ỉ̴͓͔͍̻͖͕́͆͂̕͝ / Ş̵̧̛͙̙̼̌́͑̐͠T̶̢͔̫̿̓̿̅F̷̟̗̅̄̚ͅ ̷̝̈́̏̀̾̔̑D̸̰̓̾͌͝͝4̵̠̼̓̅̆͝͠ ̷̭̺͎̇H̸͚͖͇̃̀̋͘a̷̛͎͉̦̦̐̽́̑d̷̨͖͋e̵͍͒͆ś̵͈̪͓̞ ̸̣͉̄Ḍ̸̓I̶̩͖̖̟̯͒3̵̨̡̩͇̏̏ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarGar Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -support not balanced at all trippin Resigned CI CMDR Gar | Former E11 SGT Gar | RRH Guardian Yankee 42 | Former D5 CPL Gar (one of the first) | A1 Steak Sauce I | Farmer Gar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack S Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -Support CI has to go through 3 Combatant branches, as well as most likely another wave, they are destined to fail, and usually do. No need to make it harder and less fun for them and everyone else who depends on their raids. 1 Retired DHOS || Former Wardens Comissioner Caligula || Former SRIC in R&D || Former OH8 Funni [Redacted] Man | | Retired OPSV in Maintenance || Former MMF Duck || Former HLPR Bot AC3 || Retired 2LT in E-11 || Former Head Field Scout || Former Ranger Pax || former ET || Former Omicron-9 CPT || Former OM9 EXP Delta | PoliceRP: PD LCPL | SCU LT "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. " -John F Kennedy, Rice University, Sept. 12, 1962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domo775 Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -support just get good 1 1 1 i’ve probably killed you more then once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgnisNuts Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 1 hour ago, NeoID said: “Balancing Combat” suggestion concept contradicts that entirely -Support, I don’t even need to say much else. CI CMDRCC: CI Requiem Squad XH-76 Biggest DMC Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yato Sensei Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 - Support Soo if there is 20 CI combatants on there have to be 40 foundation? That's so unbalanced... Joined 09/30/2020Retired 11/12/2022Former Security SFC || Former MTF Omi9 MSGT || Former CI CPT/MAJ || Former Nu7 LTCOL/VCMDR || Former E11 CPL || Former Maintenance Professional || Former D5 CPT || Former Senior Medic || Former Advanced Researcher | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enuz 💣 Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 3 hours ago, Shin said: -SUPPORT My reasons for this is because something like this can also happen to CI, not just to the Foundation. 5 CI members versus 15 Foundation members. And I believe that CI cannot even interfere with Researchers doing tests anymore. Personally, I would just leave this alone. There are times where CI is active when MTF is not, and then there are times when MTF is active and CI is not. You also have to think about D-Classes that want to become CI, but cannot due to a rule like this being applied. D-Classes are already too weak with 100% health to do anything to large amounts of MTF with 200% health and 200% armor. And during active times, it is 99% impossible to escape as a D-Class without assistance. Former Head of Janitorial | HCZ man geer | lvl 70 life wizard | Roblox Clothing Designer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hope Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 (edited) I've seen your response on the "Light's Report" about this thing. To be honest, I find it quite hilarious that I had to save a copy of it myself. CI can't even attack any RP-branch. E4 are the only people that can attack you, maybe if you don't be annoying to them, they wouldn't touch you. (Tip: Don't do whatever you're doing right now) Don't blame because they ruin/doesn't provide any role play experiences. Either rank up so you can have more clearance or find another solution, don't blame CI for being active. Edited July 28, 2021 by Hope 3 1 osu! achiever? I don't know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botez Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -support So basically what yato said if there is 20 CI there has to be 40 Combatants? There is never 40 combatants online unless it’s gensec meeting day or mtf. Unbalanced. idk im 2LT ok bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Talos Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -support This is the worst suggestion i have seen in a while they system we have is great the way it is and i dont think this is going to fix anything except cause more problems Best Regards From The Middle East CI General The Middle Eastern Prince The Last Oil Bender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloaker Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, Warren Talos said: -support This is the worst suggestion i have seen in a while they system we have is great the way it is and i dont think this is going to fix anything except cause more problems local teenage father :3 Retired: ci ddop cloaker s1mp Ex Senior Moderator Ex Event Team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The CI Zero Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 4 minutes ago, Warren Talos said: -support This is the worst suggestion i have seen in a while they system we have is great the way it is and i dont think this is going to fix anything except cause more problems Massive -Support "𝘕𝘰 𝘐 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯' '𝘊𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦'𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘵 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯' 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯'?" -Retired CI MAJ Zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Alpha_ Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 -1 This is a terrible idea. Former DHOS Current GENSEC LTCOL - Deputy Head Juggernaut - HIRU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexxxx Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 2 hours ago, [GL] loudyfam (Jack S) said: -Support CI has to go through 3 Combatant branches, as well as most likely another wave, they are destined to fail, and usually do. No need to make it harder and less fun for them and everyone else who depends on their raids. 1 O5 Former: DT CPT , CGO - Tenn Graneet , 31st VCMDR -> Havoc CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] funnyfish0 Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 6 hours ago, NeoID said: “Balancing Combat” suggestion concept contradicts that entirely -Support, I don’t even need to say much else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 3 hours ago, Warren Talos said: -support This is the worst suggestion i have seen in a while they system we have is great the way it is and i dont think this is going to fix anything except cause more problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted July 29, 2021 Share Posted July 29, 2021 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts