Zombinator

+support Though this won't happen. Folks with access to the content pack are aware of these errors and have not fixed them, making a rule about not using the models simply won't happen. This would force a workload on the one or two people with access to the content pack or box and I frankly feel that changing a single line of code for each error instance would take an hour or so tops once a list is compiled but it simply won't happen. Why not? Good question for them.

+support Free to play Sarkic? Better buff CI.

+Support Extremely active and knowledgeable, I'd give the man what he wants.

+support The motd states "CI are not to initiate combat on Containment Specialists, or researchers / utility staff actively testing or working in a containment cell." This rule should be broadened to cover Sarkic and SCPs.

-support remove 912 and give CI more raid SCPs? This is getting silly.

+support You'd best take him up on this interest.

+Support 5 seconds is a sick joke.

+Support If D4 is E11 then they should follow the same rules as E11.

+Support Oversight on the mapper's part.

Thank you!

Every time I use the damaging right click I am told that I am not allowed to use it. I am wanting clarity about this.

What are you suggesting? - Add a line to SCP-912's rules that states "Though SCP-912 is classified as a combatant, he is prohibited from right-clicking D-Class and CI personnel except in self defense, or in defense of other Foundation Staff or Class-Ds only." Current self-defense rules state: "The self defense clause is satisfied by observing CI personnel, D-Class or SCPs attack other non-combatants or being attacked themselves. D-Class that interfere with Site operations and are armed may be killed as long as it doesn't violate FearRP." I would like to clarify the rules regarding SCP-912's right click of his baton. The baton right click deals ten damage and assists in stunning players quicker because it is on a separate cooldown from the left click. I would like the same self defense clause that applies to non-combatants to apply to SCP-912 so that when lives are actually in danger he may take more desperate measures to subdue threats. In short, I would like the right click option to be clearly stated as available under current self-defense rules. How would this change better the server? - When there are three Class-D or CI rioting and actively dealing damage to himself or those under his protection, SCP-912 becomes much more able to provide effective defense. This change would solidify SCP-912 as a protective force for the Foundation as he would only be able to right click legal targets that are dealing legal damage, much the same as The RIG, Advanced Combat Medic and Mobile Mop Force classes which are already always exempt from this rule, and are considered combatant classes though SCP-912 would only be able to take these actions under the self-defense clause. He is currently the only combatant that cannot participate in self-defense outright and I believe this to be an oversight that would benefit everyone by being clarified. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - This change would make escaping as a Class-D or raiding as a CI slightly more difficult, though a group of three armed people will still quickly overwhelm SCP-912. Who would this change mostly benefit? - SCP-912, all Foundation Staff. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion -

Sounds like a skill issue. They KOS him.

Policemen have more than a uniform, they have badges and authority. MMF are just janitors with guns. RIS is a tool built by researchers to protect them. Neither are equivalent to authority-wielding officers with badges. Under this logic SCP-912 shouldn't be allowed in D-Block and shouldn't obey anyone on-site. Just slap him in a containment cell and call it a day, following that thinking. The infrequency of players performing legitimate roleplay on this server merits its own post and discussion. RIS and MMF need to be on the lookout for SCPs, this is an **SCP-RP** server after all. SCP-912 is an ***SCP*** and deserves to have people keep an eye on him. Just like SCP-076-2, weapons out around SCP-912 cause a reaction. The fact that SCP-912 can be successfully utilized by Foundation staff is an intended roleplay and gameplay mechanic, it is hardly silly just because you don't seem to understand it. I hope this post helps clarify. Following wiki SCP lore and established gameplay rules definitely accents roleplay for many people, I'm sorry its not your cup of tea. Being arrested and handed over to an MTF is interesting and exciting to some folks, many consider it amusing. The majority of SCP-912 players are breaking the rules according to you. The !motd stipulates a *must*: "SCP-912 must order any non-MTF or non-GENSEC personnel to put away their weapons. If the player fails to put away their weapons 912 can attack with its baton until the player puts the weapon away. If the player draws their weapon again 912 may then use his baton to stun and arrest the player, even if they put their weapon away." This means that you are literally saying that the majority of SCP-912 players ignore a *must* and commit FailRP. I don't encourage rule-breaking. Using a bind to motion for someone to put a weapon away and giving them 5 seconds to comply is not only polite, its well within RP and !motd stipulations. How is it so much of a combat gameplay problem to keep an eye on what jobs and SCPs are near you and putting your weapon away accordingly? Watching chat or listening to people speak is part of combat RP and situational awareness is a bare-minimum requirement. -------------------------------------------------------------------- "Taking advantage" sounds a lot like following intended rules to avoid FailRP warnings instead of choosing to commit teaming. From the !motd: "If the player fails to put away their weapons 912 can attack with its baton until the player puts the weapon away. If the player draws their weapon again 912 may then use his baton to stun and arrest the player, even if they put their weapon away. SCP-912 may attempt to arrest rule breakers and bring them to GENSEC or MTF personnel. SCP-912 must comply with any orders given to it by GENSEC or MTF personnel." The wording from the !motd states that he *must* ask them to put it away, that he *can* hit them with his baton and that he *may* arrest them. You're attempting to make an issue of someone following the rules and choosing to be lenient in lieu of arresting. A shame that wasn't brought to the attention of your command as well. As far as "undoubtedly" being released, they aren't always. Its up to the discretion of the GENSEC or MTF what to do with the rule breaker. Any number of roleplay scenarios can occur after this, it is up to the imagination and wishes of those involved in the RP. Providing open-ended RP opportunities for people is a cornerstone of good gameplay. As Rookieblue, the ***HEAD OF STAFF*** has mentioned, these mechanics are all working as intended. I was a bit on the fence before, but this thread has solidified my opinion as a whoppingly decisive -SUPPORT