NeoID

It’s not your job. Each Branch does, and should have it’s unique feats. We should work hard to ensure those never overlap. Whether Nu7, and E11, or Research and R&D. Each one should have their own individual tasks. I once again encourage E11 to come up with new tasks to become more engaging and involved on surface. -Support

Fine. I see how it is.

If you’re incapable of following the same standards we all do, you should find something else to do with your time, as for it to not become a burden on others

Meh. -Support See this comes off to me more like an RP thing. If a D-Class, or Maynard walked in, and was cool with RPing being manipulated and brainwashed. Then I don’t see an issue with it. This is basically brainwashing against ones will. Which in R&D, we have to ASK if they’re ok with brainwashing, and be sure to receive verbal consent. This seems like something that would piss people off.

+ Support on this concept. Zombie claws give me a headache. Zombies should be a little more hard to kill when they are, you know. Already dead.

The removal from ET was justified. Several Guidelines were broken, and have been dealt with. However, I see no reason why you should receive further punishment. Removal from ET, serves as the active punishment for the misconduct provided. A warning and a ban seems off the rails to me. Considering he broke ET Guidelines, no MOTD Rule. Removal from Staff is debatable. However, I can understand that being performed as well. For me, it’s a +Support. He broke ET/Staff guidelines. He made both ET and Staff look ridiculous. As such, he’s been punished for it. Further punishment is unnecessary, as he did not break any MOTD rules.

Scared the fuck out of me. I mean, we have a whole branch over here that wears the Suits/Robbers model. But I also understand why it could be difficult for Security with then having the DoRS in and out of D-Block at times. Before much else, lets hear from both @Weissas DoRS, and @Texasas the CC Owner

Wait. HOW DID I MISS THIS. Man you slip in and out way too goddamn quietly. It’s a shame to see you go again. You were always great to talk to, and I hope to see a return one day! Don’t leave us in the dark man!

I personally think you need to become more insightful about things. You tend to become very rambled, and shakey at times. And I think you need to work on becoming more direct. +/- Support

Even if this was an ET app, rest assured. It’d be denied. Massive -Support, you got a lot of making up to do before you’d be considered for ET, much less Staff.

I see no reason why he cannot. +

k

It’s ok. We’ll still kick Gensecs ass, no matter how many buffs they get

Ehhh +Support - Could go either way. Some people might consider it FailRP, others vise versa. In my eyes, theres was a 0.1 second period between bagel saying "Dont Move" and the grenade animation starting. Too short of a distance to be called upon. Now, the MOTD states that both: Individuals can be FearRP'd even if armed. Individuals actively engaged in combat can not be placed under FearRP But due to it saying "engaged in combat" rather than "Wielding an active Firearm". I think throwing a Grenade would account for it. Considering it's an aggressive action made again the Enemy.

I picked it up, but then I gambled it away. It's probably split in like 5 peoples balance now.

+/- Support - Here's the thing, I can understand the frustration of there only being one door that they have to get a pathfinder into,. - While I wouldn't make the door bigger, what I would do is add a SECOND door on the other side of the warehouse, that way CI has to defend more points, and MTF have to attack from more points in order to flip open the big door. - It would require a Map Update in order to do, which could be 2+ months off. - A Second Big door is not needed. However, a second small door could suffice

+Support Good Idea, 100% for it, thing is that yes, we will have new performance issues if it’s constantly having to track 100 players timers. Heres my solution for it, don’t put down a timer per say, but instead, have a Timestamp of your last death appear say under your Connection Ping.

(Apologies on the late response. I had been under the assumption somebody had already accepted it)

No

Good luck man! Hope to see you return soon!!!

Honestly +Support I’ve taken 4 sits in the past 3 days that involved SCP-939, 3 out of 4 of those sits, the involved person(s) were incredibly argumentative with my punishment/decision for the sit. Problem is, with 939, it always comes down to Staff Discretion, considering the rules aren’t exactly clear on what IS considered a sound, and when the effect of that sound is “no longer in effect”