Sixx

+Support I'll use Maynard as an example here, when Maynard attacks and kills someone in the foundation usually he gets terminated. Surge is claiming that a GenSec was attacking a command memeber in GenSec and he terminated the attacker, I dont see this as RDM as much as it is protecting a command member from a threat. The situation should of never happened in the first place in all honesty and Surge probaly should've put out a KOS on the attacker for shooting a Command member then killed the attacker to avoid any problems. Edit: A verbal warning should of been issued to the person that attacked a GenSec command member and to surge. GenSec should not be attacking one another in the first place but for all you know in RP that GenSec could always be a CI spy. This whole situation looks like a misunderstanding.

+Support An amazing and active SM, would be an amazing Jugg

Well all I did was tell Bazooka that there was a good chance that you killed the Slueth Via Crossfire from what I saw, but bazzoka stated that you were lying to him, broke NLR, and FailRPd which I did not comment on. Furthermore you need to follow the format for a warn appeal and you should at least gather some evidence that proves that the warn was false.

+Support Well made applicaton, hope ya get it.

Its was an honor being a fellow MAJ with you man, I wish you the best of luck!

You would do amazing as a forum diplomat but you should start trying to be more active and the forums.

-Support Ah yes, 682 2.0. I can see a slight HP buff feasible but this is too much.

+Support Sure

What is happening on this application, lol Well +Support from me

You can hide your post