Jump to content

Weiss

Head Admin
  • Posts

    528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Weiss

  1. Weiss

    Requesting HMR

    Accepted. Ask any command or staff (Admin+ rank) that are online for the whitelist.
  2. Damn, that's one way to give me a heart attack. I hope you find some fun stuff to do; I'll keep in touch. It's been super awesome having you here.
  3. An interesting concept; However I highly doubt it will remove his desire to produce a "cure". Neatly formatted, not of particularly large length excluding the pasted sections of his file; But an alright read overall. I have been wondering how 049 does with modern practices and equipment. Such as the da Vinci Surgical System.
  4. I see no issue here; Move along, move along. Though it is interesting 999 does not care for virtual entities. Thus has an understanding of the concept.
  5. Accepted. Whilst you can be trouble; You do have a good amount of practice in the field of testing. I'll go ahead and accept this under the condition you behave and follow what you're stating in your application. Don't go around spreading weird chemical solutions around to other foundation staff; We have D-class for a reason. (Also that you show respect to other players and their branches....)
  6. Weiss

    Requesting HMR

    This is just a test log. Please fill out the application.
  7. Accepted. App is a bit bare bones but whatever. Log is pretty decent and you have good reviews from low command.
  8. Application denied. User is no longer in research.
  9. +support Was super certain there was a statement allowing enough normal flashlights pointed at SCP-280 to prevent it from attacking. Nor did the wording on the MOTD indicate it worked as a form of FearRP rather than being a complete re-containment tool. However, upon further clarification via SMT; The latter is in-fact the case. Thus this warn is a misinterpretation on my part and thus invalid. (Also I must be becoming illiterate >_>)
  10. A pretty good read. You did well with the info you had to work on and it was cleanly formatted. I really have no major issues to address. If you wanted to go above and beyond. You certainly could make a fancier format and add additional length to the test log, However as it stands this is pretty quality.
  11. Man that was not fun to read; Please work on your formatting. Yes, you're active and participate in alot of testing; Whilst you certainly need to improve on your handling of SCPs(Which you are actively doing). I think you'll make a good addition. Accepted. Contact any research command online for your whitelist.
  12. I was tasked specifically by Catsro to do so. The ban length is as set by Igneous.
  13. After review of your application; Your application ha been denied. This can be because of your application, experience, behavior, feedback, or other unstated reasons.
  14. There are certain fish that can breath on land; So I'd imagine they'd get thirsty from not having enough water to osmosis.
  15. I was in-fact decently sure on the warning as I've dealt with a semi-similar case. In this case it was purposefully switching classes to avoid RP which Comrade then immediately re-engaged with SCP-049 after switching. My similar valid case being someone immediately jumping into acid to avoid being 049-2 Thus I issued a warning for FailRP. Comrade was very much against my decision, thus I recommend an appeal to get input from SMT as well as info for any cases similar to this if they occur in the future.
  16. Sometimes I find targeting the weaker units is more beneficial depending on their numbers. Even OFCs are capable of dealing serious damage. Eliminating their possible sources of damage and simultaneous angles of fire; Thus allowing you to single out the remaining tankier classes. This of course all depends on numbers; If you're alone and outnumbered by a good amount; They'll finish NLR faster than you can pick them off.
  17. I happened to be spectating the scene while on duty. From my point of view the MTF fired first, missed and forced the Infil to fire back. Unfortunately I do not have video proof of this and may just be wrong on this view point. However, thus after confirming the rule with other staff and E11 command and consideration of the player at hand not being new; Went ahead and issued a warn. As well, it states in the staff handbook. "A verbal warning can be given out in response to minor misconduct, and can be used in situations where someone may be new to the server and not fully aware of specific rules." I took this account and did not consider Daniels a new player; As they are Junior Command and a 3 month member of E11.
×
×
  • Create New...