Weiss

Please post your tests logs in this thread. https://gaminglight.com/forums/forum/521-scp/

Please post your tests logs in this thread. https://gaminglight.com/forums/forum/521-scp/

Please post your tests logs in this thread. https://gaminglight.com/forums/forum/521-scp/

All applications should be made in their own posts with the titles (name)'s Research Command Application and using the format listed below. Post your application here: https://gaminglight.com/forums/forum/525-research/ DO NOT POST YOUR APPLICATIONS HERE. Applications due 10/25/19 Senior Researcher+ Should be the only ones applying for Command. Format: Name: Current Rank: Time in Research (Approximate): Why should you be research command, AKA what can you bring to the table that the rest of command can't? (100-word minimum); What will you do to make research more active and better? (100 word minimum)(Tangible items like activity, expertise or the ability to run trainings, etc)?;

Juniors are not permitted to cross test. Please consult the testing rules located on the research SOP. Thank you.

An incredibly simple test. Though I don't recall seeing someone measuring the actual speed it takes place at. Perhaps try seeing a humans brain pattern response in real time under the effects of 999? Hormone release? Otherwise very basic.

A rather redundant test, but sure, Same issues as your last logs, but worse formatting. You're really rushing out these test, please put more time into them. This is not gradable.

Same deal as the last log. Way too much simplification, not enough description and detail of your observation and analysis.

Seems fairly compacted and rushed. In the future please add more detail to your observation and analysis; You don't need to simplify your findings.

I'll see you Sunday at the meeting. >_>

On an important note. You don't need to copy-paste the entire SCP description from the wiki site each time. Your own brief summary would do just fine.

This test is certainly quite simple and done over many times; Though it is good to go over again to look for changes of course. Whilst nothing is too particularly eye-catching on this log; Perhaps you'll have some luck with the test-log results on the vitamin-infused diet?

Please use complete sentences and descriptions in your tests. Giving this to my graders would just be a waste of their time. Please revise your log and resubmit it.

This does not follow the testing format. Please revise and resubmit your test log.

Seems incomplete and rushed. Please go back and revise.

Application falls far from meeting the minimum requirements. Denied until revisons are made.

All applications should be made in their own posts with the titles (name)'s Research Command Application and using the format listed below. Post your application here: https://gaminglight.com/forums/forum/525-research/ DO NOT POST YOUR APPLICATIONS HERE. Applications due 9/26/19 Researcher+ Should be the only ones applying for Command. Name: Current Rank: Time in Research (Approximate): EU or US supervisor?: Why should you be research command, AKA what can you bring to the table that the rest of command can't? (100-word minimum); What will you do to make research more active and better? (100 word minimum)(Tangible items like activity, expertise or the ability to run trainings, etc)?;

Research Rollcall. Only respond if you're Associate Reseacher+ Rollcall submissions are due by 9/28. Failure to respond will result in removal. Format Lore Name: Steam ID: Rank: Activity Level:

Name (What it is on the Roster): Weiss Rank? SFC SteamID: STEAM_0:0:39334457 What server is your activity majority based on (EU or US): US How is your activity in Gensec (Good, poor, ect): Decent. (Research is priority.)

A simple, but relatively useful test. I have yet to see this or recall this being done before. A nice introduction test.

Quite surprising. From my experience with 049; SCP-049 has been quite narrow-minded. Whilst trusting him with foundation personnel currently is far too risky. (Besides D class; And perhaps E class?) Perhaps by making attempts to broaden his perspective could serve to somewhat pacify SCP-049? Otherwise, certainly an interesting test.

Nicely done, though it's probably a good idea to stick with D class for now. I would rate this a quality.

Technically I dd not personally approve of this, but sure. >_> Review wise. I give this a rating of sub-standard. You've provided no background information (Information already known, relevant to the test. It does not have to be your own information.) Nor have you given any explanation or detail on your observation. (Separate from Visual Stimuli). In the future please ensure you thoroughly go through each prompt. I also highly recommend proofreading and having a peer review your work if you're unsure; Otherwise, this seems rather rushed.

Application accepted.

Application denied. Contact me on Discord for further elaboration.