Dane

Sorry Milip but +Support Shouldn't be saying that my guy... on OOC too...

Aye, it's good to have you back.

+Support Not really necessary to add, but eh.

d i s a s t e r

+Support Unacceptable behavior as a staff member. This is a bad example of a staff member for our players and other new staff members. Should receive a strike.

Exactly what Gaur said.

Garry's Mod Team Fortress 2 pretty much games that were made by Valve.

is this a gta reference ?

-Support Follow the format, otherwise Management team will not be able to do anything about it.

Neutral Waiting on the said staff member's side of the story. Also, you should get an evidence.

+Support

-Support No evidence.

Old school musics, classic rock.

+Support I think it would make undercover chargers more unmarked and stealthy.

Mjay, please come speak with me ASAP in TS. Congratulations on your promotion. -Assistant Chief Dane

+Support Active in TS. Friendly staff member. Mature and professional. Respectful and nice. Application is good. Deserves a chance, good luck!

+Support Active in TS. Mature and professional. Has good judgement. Respectful and friendly. Application is good. Deserves a chance, good luck!

+Support Active in TS. Friendly staff member. Has good judgement. Application is good. Deserves a chance, good luck!

Neutral I'd like to see this back again, but the one thing that I disagree with is that the props that you have shouldn't be removed if you get taken to an AFK mode.

+Support If this does help reduce the lag, then why not.

Neutral It could help get more staff on duty because nowadays staff members would just focus on roleplaying instead of staffing. Players wouldn't have to wait a while to get a staff member to get to them. Nowadays staff members would pretend to be AFK and wait for other staff members to get on. If we have the ratio, this would reduce fake AFK staff members. If the server is under ratio, staff members who just got on the server would have to be forced to get on duty. Staff calls are usually calm when there is more than 50+ players online. If we added it back, there's not really any use to having a lot of staff members on duty when there is not a lot of staff calls. Overall, I would be perfectly fine if they added it back. However, I think there would be some downsides if we added the ratio back. If we did added it back, maybe we should increase the amount of staff members needed per amount of players, I'd say like 1 staff / 30 players.

+Support Both of these rules would be beneficial for everyone, and I don't see any problems on adding these rules.

-Support Let's say that this was removed. If there is one staff when there is 90 people on, and that one staff member is getting rained by a lot of staff calls, off duty staff members would not realize that a staff member is needing assistance with staff calls. Sure they can ask in chat for assistance, but nowadays people just roleplay too much and does not pay attention to the chat. Staff calls is pretty big on your screen and it also makes a pretty loud noise when there is one popping up.

-Support Yeah nah. This radio is good but could use some work like what Bob Bob said.

+Support Activity in-game is good. Activity in TS is good. Has leadership skills. Trains cadets. Assists officers in need. Mature and responsible. Application needs more effort. Could use more time as a SM. Overall, I think that you deserve a Low Command spot. I see you doing well in PD and I never had any troubles with you, and I think that you are pretty active. Although, I'd like to mention that you should get more effort on your application, it looks a bit rushed. I would be happy to see a new Low Command member. Good luck! Colonel Dane