Squash Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 What are you suggesting? - Removing the rule to RC 096 which is "walk behind him and bag him" How would this change better the server? - It would make it so 096's cant abuse this, I remember a 096 using this rule against me and I was cool about it, but he kept looking at me and not showing his back at all to me which made it impossible to bag him, in lore 096 would not pay attention to anybody, hes blind. I understand that some people just completely ignore this rule, but when it comes to someone know the rule and abusing it, then I find that very frustrating. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - I don't see a disadvantage Who would this change mostly benefit? - Mostly Foundation Personnel & CI. Make it easier for MTF to RC 096 & easier for CI to capture him. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - None Photo of Rule below 1 Foundation Archivist | Operations Supervisor | SCP-RP Senior Admin | Forums Diplomat | Support 1 | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Propane Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 -support Jusy look down/at a wall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TG_Kilo Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 +Support I had some 096’s who’d look at me when I try to bag them, making it really difficult to bag them from behind. Maybe a rule saying when someone is going to bag 096, he has to sit down (hold CRTL) "L’Eggo My Eggo" ||Omi9|| E11 PFC || CI RND Researcher || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 18 minutes ago, Propane said: -support Jusy look down/at a wall Not the problem here i believe, its that if you are nitpicky about the rule 096 cannot be contained if you are not directly behind him. +Support for a slight rewrite to just get rid of the "behind" part, but keep the bagging ofcourse. "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinaedeInvictus Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 -support If the bagging method of recontaining 096 was removed then it would be too easy for 096 to be recontained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 2 minutes ago, CinaedeInvictus said: -support If the bagging method of recontaining 096 was removed then it would be too easy for 096 to be recontained. That ship has been sailed. Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Dtscalice Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 +support Recently ive seen a few 096s doing this where they just flip around to look at the people so they cant be RCd Truth is just a matter of perspective. The duty of every soldier is to protect the innocent ~Captain Price (Modern Warfare 2) Former CMD Positions: E11 1LT, Medical Chief Manager, CI LT and SRIC, Alpha 1 CPL, RRH Squad Lead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Jack I the One & Only Posted October 10, 2020 Share Posted October 10, 2020 +support give 096 a buff later doe TCM Jack CI Heinz / J03 Italian Mob Boss Zepelli Former CI Research Administrator Heinz - Not [REDACTED] Researcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kumandant Posted October 10, 2020 Share Posted October 10, 2020 +Support The “walk behind him” rule has been subject as a disgusting example of certain people twisting the rules words to gain an unfair advantage, and to get people who try to bag them in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dect Posted October 10, 2020 Share Posted October 10, 2020 On 10/9/2020 at 6:58 AM, Phillers said: Not the problem here i believe, its that if you are nitpicky about the rule 096 cannot be contained if you are not directly behind him. +Support for a slight rewrite to just get rid of the "behind" part, but keep the bagging ofcourse. Former Security 2LT | Former EWD| Former OM5|Former Medical SM|Former Reznov Klushkie| Former SCP-RP Senior Moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jameshi34 Posted October 12, 2020 Share Posted October 12, 2020 On 10/10/2020 at 11:17 AM, Kumandant said: +Support The “walk behind him” rule has been subject as a disgusting example of certain people twisting the rules words to gain an unfair advantage, and to get people who try to bag them in trouble. Gensec LTCOL | Deputy Head Warden | S.T.A.R.S. | Michael Jones Enthusiast do you are have stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mind Stone Posted October 12, 2020 Share Posted October 12, 2020 On 10/9/2020 at 3:58 AM, Phillers said: Not the problem here i believe, its that if you are nitpicky about the rule 096 cannot be contained if you are not directly behind him. +Support for a slight rewrite to just get rid of the "behind" part, but keep the bagging ofcourse. Retired LCZ Manager : Pingas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted October 12, 2020 Share Posted October 12, 2020 +Support - Throughout my time there have been some 096's that jsut go into a corner and has it back facing it. Making it not possible to recontain them. On 10/9/2020 at 11:13 AM, CinaedeInvictus said: -support If the bagging method of recontaining 096 was removed then it would be too easy for 096 to be recontained. Also, They have to roll to bag him so its not really changing much. It could be that he gets a +10 on rolling to balance it out. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altair Posted October 13, 2020 Share Posted October 13, 2020 (edited) -support 096 is already EXTREAMLY easy to recontain idk why even make it even more easy its like saying make it only 1 gun to recontain 049 096 only has that plan to help him also it never works if you just look at the floor and walk towards him which you should be doing anyway there is no reason for you to walk towards him facing his face anyway even if his looking the other way i think he can sense it lore wise because if someone looks at his picture he enrage or anything releated to it he enrages without even knowing they looked at his face i think he has an ability to sense it or something if 096 cant turn back or walk backwards you can easily easily counter it Edited October 13, 2020 by Tweety Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southpaw Posted October 13, 2020 Share Posted October 13, 2020 10 hours ago, Tweety said: -support 096 is already EXTREAMLY easy to recontain idk why even make it even more easy its like saying make it only 1 gun to recontain 049 096 only has that plan to help him also it never works if you just look at the floor and walk towards him which you should be doing anyway there is no reason for you to walk towards him facing his face anyway even if his looking the other way i think he can sense it lore wise because if someone looks at his picture he enrage or anything related to it he enrages without even knowing they looked at his face i think he has an ability to sense it or something if 096 cant turn back or walk backwards you can easily easily counter it SCP-RP: G.O.C MAJ | Alpha-1 SGT 'Rose' | Strike Team Hammer 'Goose' | Event Team Member Retired: E11 LTCOL | Omi9 MAJ | Nu7 LTCOL | OH3 | Senior Mod | Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altair Posted October 14, 2020 Share Posted October 14, 2020 (edited) How about you make it 1 person to recontain 173 and 1 gun to recontain 049 ? you might as well make 682 tranqable at 5500 maybe nerf 966 to 200 hp? oh make it that 939 cant attack alt walking people no maybe increase 106 cooldown to 3 minutes you said make it easier for MTF to recontain him it only takes 1 person to recontain 096 -_- and usually there is over 15 MTF half of them surrunding him DON'T forget that security can also recontain him so he is a joke already including 173 and 049 think about the SCPs too please ;-; Edited October 14, 2020 by Tweety Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted October 14, 2020 Share Posted October 14, 2020 Addendum to my previous response. Reclently yesterday i met someone who litteraly faced us whenever we tried to bag him. Saying "Oh you can't bag me gotta be behind me" I believe this needs to be added. Although, i believe that these rules should be added. - Where 096 has to be drained to a certain ammount of hp before it can be bagged. So its similar to 939 and 682 Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squash Posted October 14, 2020 Author Share Posted October 14, 2020 I made this suggestion due to the fact people like to abuse this rule, also again most people don't even follow this rule to begin with. When a 096 player figures out this rule they just abuse it from my encounters by not turning there backs to me which in lore 096 would not pay attention to me at all. 1 Foundation Archivist | Operations Supervisor | SCP-RP Senior Admin | Forums Diplomat | Support 1 | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rektify Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 On 10/9/2020 at 3:58 AM, Phillers said: Not the problem here i believe, its that if you are nitpicky about the rule 096 cannot be contained if you are not directly behind him. +Support for a slight rewrite to just get rid of the "behind" part, but keep the bagging ofcourse. ~Your Local SCP Lead Admin~ Aka: Rekti-HighThe REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loaff Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 +support Keep the bagging rule, and remove the "from behind" requirement to avoid petty people who continuously face you. Former Ranks Head Of Maintenance And Engineering Senior Admin Support Supervisor Forum Diplomat Custom Classes The Sniper (Owner) XG56-Orion's Belt (Owner) The Engineer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icee jay Posted October 19, 2020 Share Posted October 19, 2020 On 10/9/2020 at 6:39 AM, Propane said: -support Jusy look down/at a wall The old E11 CMDR Jay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack S Posted October 19, 2020 Share Posted October 19, 2020 On 10/10/2020 at 11:17 AM, Kumandant said: +Support The “walk behind him” rule has been subject as a disgusting example of certain people twisting the rules words to gain an unfair advantage, and to get people who try to bag them in trouble. I 100% agree with Kuma Retired DHOS || Former Wardens Comissioner Caligula || Former SRIC in R&D || Former OH8 Funni [Redacted] Man | | Retired OPSV in Maintenance || Former MMF Duck || Former HLPR Bot AC3 || Retired 2LT in E-11 || Former Head Field Scout || Former Ranger Pax || former ET || Former Omicron-9 CPT || Former OM9 EXP Delta | PoliceRP: PD LCPL | SCU LT "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. " -John F Kennedy, Rice University, Sept. 12, 1962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted October 19, 2020 Share Posted October 19, 2020 On 10/10/2020 at 11:17 AM, Kumandant said: +Support The “walk behind him” rule has been subject as a disgusting example of certain people twisting the rules words to gain an unfair advantage, and to get people who try to bag them in trouble. The amount of times this has been an issue is uncountable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOBeanz Posted October 19, 2020 Share Posted October 19, 2020 +Support to change the rule, not remove it Ive been worried that this particular aspect of 096 rules could be abused by the 096 player, and this thread confirms my worries. We'd probably be better off altering the rule slightly to remove the 'behind' phrasing, and just make it so he can be bagged when he's not in a rage state, or something similar O5-9: "Misfortune" A.K.A. "Mr. Unlucky" "Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Mike Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 On 10/9/2020 at 8:13 AM, CinaedeInvictus said: -support If the bagging method of recontaining 096 was removed then it would be too easy for 096 to be recontained. He didnt say remove the rule he said remove the behind part. +Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts