Jump to content

Jameshi34

Member
  • Posts

    233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jameshi34

  1. +Support - I don't think you could've written a better app. Only discrepancy is in #13, but otherwise fantastic app. - Has the most experience out of all of the current CPTs/1LTs. - Works well with the rest of CMD. - Obviously, activity. But, I mean, look who's talking. Personally, I think activity is less important in SCMD than in LCMD, but either way you do need to step it up. Best of luck.
  2. Makes sense to me. Same as SCP:SL. I don't play 173 too much nor do I have to deal with it all too often, and the chances of a 173 breach during light failure is incredibly low, so I don't think this would affect too many people. It simply makes more sense from an RP standpoint. +Support
  3. Lmao i remember screaming at a poor Warden to follow me then typed the funny into 294 and killed us both, good times
  4. Name: Jameshi Warden Name (If applicable): Horace Rank: LTCOL Date (MM/DD): 3/23 Date you will return (MM/DD): 4/5 (13 days) Previous LOA (If applicable): Uhh, a month and a half ago? Reason (can be private): I have these wonderful things called IAs that I have to do and I’m gonna need all the time I can get for them.
  5. I've gotta push through the final quarter of school and I simply won't have the time to manage being Senior CMD in 2 branches. However since I joined CMD in this branch we've gotten much more CMD. I remember it used to be Frank, Pills, Duncan and myself as the non-HCMD of the branch. It's lovely to see so many new CMD members promoting the branch and keeping up activity and I know it'll just keep getting better. To Frank, best of luck as the head of 2 subbranches, I know you'll be getting AHOME soon enough. Once things lighten up I'll be sure to come back and visit. (Sorry I won't be able to do the mass promos at the meeting anymore lmao, good luck to whoever takes up the challenge.) Farewell comrades.
  6. Name: Jameshi Rank: LTCOL SteamID: STEAM_0:0:211312778 Current Sub-Branches your in: FTO, Sniper, Riot Control, Wardens, Jugg Why should you retain your rank (Command ONLY | 150+ words): I should retain my rank as LTCOL because I am not only one of the most active Gensec, but I also play off-hours, and I fulfill my duties to the best of my ability every day. I hold myself to a high standard through all of my duties and I think I have a strong enough sense of justice to be trusted with this CMD rank. I know, for the most part, what I'm supposed to do and what I'm not allowed to do, but I'm still getting experience and learning from my mistakes, and I'd like to keep doing so. Personally, I think I'm doing a fine job as a CMD member and I think I'll only keep getting better. My combat skills may not be as good as some other people's but they're not bad either. I hold the DHWD position, which in and of itself proves my leadership skills, leadership being an important aspect of each and every CMD member. Any Notes, Questions, or Concerns?: Hello Can I Have A Promotion?
  7. Currently show up as an error to everyone not subscribed to it. Job Name: Secondary Tactical Assistance Response Squad Job Code: stars Workshop Link: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=777496756
  8. Jameshi34

    Spud's LOA

    Cringe nae nae baby anime furry kamehameha wave anti-pog forever ewd dummy thicc dhfto cringe lmao play some black and white for me gaylord
  9. Name: Jameshi Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:211312778 Branch (if in both, say so): Maintenance Rank(s): MM Activity Level (1-10): 7 Notes (Concerns/Roster Needs): Nah
  10. I bid you adieu, come back soon gamer
  11. If only the target practice improved our aim a bit :[ +Support, maybe not for the cards but the rest of the stuff looks cool.
  12. To clarify, I'm not suggesting removing the gun. I don't know where this came from, I'm looking for a damage nerf.
  13. No, a damage nerf is needed. The reload for it isn't all that bad and more than half of Security's forces don't have limb damage, so headshots don't matter. Making it so it's not able to be put on new CCs sounds like a good idea until you realize that 90% of good D-Class CCs already have this on them. Making it so new CCs can't have it won't work for me.
  14. What are you suggesting? - Nerfing the Thompson Contender G2 from 110 dmg to 95 dmg. How would this change better the server? - After conducting damage tests, I believe this weapon is too powerful for the D-Class at its current state. Here are the results we gathered: OFC-LCPL | 2 shot body/head (no limb damage) CPL- SNCO | 3 shot body/head (CPL), 3 shot body and 2 shot head (NCO) (CPL has no limb damage | NCO jobs have limb damage) WO-SCMD | 4 shot body, 4 shot head (no limb damage) HCMD | 5 shot body and 4 shot head (has limb damage) Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - D-Class CCs lose a broken gun Who would this change mostly benefit? - Foundation Personnel Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - tfa_contender is the gun
  15. You say that Warmercarp was talking to you in admin chat although the only time Warmercarp talked to you was in his message in OOC at 2:15 in the video. I just confirmed with him and they checked logs, there was not a single message from Warmercarp in the chat for quite a while after that one. You're lying now. Noah came over saying you were in a sit and told you to come back to which you said "No". If this isn't negligence I don't know what is.
  16. Your In-game: Jameshi Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:211312778 The admin's name in-game: Security Guard Leader Sprink The admin's steam name (If you know it): [GL]Sprink What did the admin do: When the admin was brought to a sit through the ticket system they flew away immediately after being brought. They flew away to avoid the sit and seemed to not care for having a sit placed against him at all, at the time they were on ET. Evidence of the abusive action(s) (REQUIRED): What do you believe should happen to the admin: Strike/Warn/Removal Any extra information: The admin was brought to a sit for hosting an event during both a CI Supplies raid and a Gensec PT, where the event focused on RDMing all of Wardens which turned in to RDMing all of Gensec and forcing Nu7 to hold it in lieu of the few Security that were not in the PT. His excuse was he's allowed to do the events, to which I said even though he's allowed that doesn't mean he should be, he said "Alright cool" then he promptly flew away, during a sit and did not return.
  17. +Support - Proven ME - Lovely to be around in TS - Has shown a proficiency in completing logs, hope that carries over to patrols and promotions if this gets accepted - Would love to work with him as a CMD member
  18. ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy +SUPPORT
  19. Yato God. Emphasis on God. Couldn't have made my stance more clear. There's already a suggestion to get RC nerfed, in my eyes having both is like a double-edged sword but both sides are facing Gensec.
  20. I've got a few things to say, I guess. We've had this RC since October 2020. The blue line was implemented just before then, and this was our countermeasure to it. Way afterwards D-Class were graced with a black barricade because of Site-10v2, making Partial Lockdown seem like a worthless protocol to us. It still is in my opinion. On Site-05, Partial Lockdown was the end-all-be-all, the armageddon of D-Class, a Rapture of poor prisoner souls. It was amazing, because of its power. However, D-Class still broke through from time to time. I really don't like how you guys have to come down in a closed off small box and then start to fight. It was a billion percent better when you could shoot at us going up the elevator when trying to riot. Partial Lockdown had meaning at that time. From what I've seen, some of the best riots the server's ever seen have been on Site-05. I can't think of a single one that I actually enjoyed being a part of after the implementation of the blue line and black barricade on Site-10. What we have now is an overcooked hot dog when compared to the mighty bratwurst that was Site-05 D-Block. I understand time and effort was put into the D-Block we have now but it's caused way too many problems for both sides for it to be considered better than the old one. Also, Igneous just announced earlier that a map update was happening soon so if anybody is listening we'll likely be going back to Site-05 D-Block with the sniper tower and the proper NCO barricade and the elevator sides for D-Class to hide behind and the stage in the back and the ledge of doom where when you stand on it you get sniped within seconds. I can't say much positive things about our current D-Block, other than I've mastered the jump from the billboard onto the fence while running. In essence, I propose we wait until they push out old D-Block and see how our sides stand. Making RC ineffective may help D-Class in the now, but Security will push for it to be buffed right after the map update if things aren't going swimmingly. Chances are we'll nerf a few classes once we get the hang of things with the new old D-Block (please please PLEASE bring it back). We seriously don't want to have any blue or purple lines or black barricades, none of that. If we need to make some changes in the next branch update I think we'd all be more than willing. Of course, this suggestion will probably be accepted anyway. D-Class are on a win-streak with these. I guess I'm just hoping we're not jumping the gun if that makes sense. My eyes hurt, good night.
×
×
  • Create New...