Quangasaurusrex Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 What you want to see? - pd should have weapon checkers -> LCPL+ since LCPL can apply for state, and state has it. So does fbi... and ss... etc. Why should we add it? - handcuffing someone, then checking, then unhandcuffing takes way too long than it should (~7 seconds vs 1 second) What are the advantages of having this? - faster times to check ppl. Who is it mainly for? - pd Links to any content - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sion Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 +support Tac have it, why not pd 'you may see my struggle, but you won't see me quit' 'Success depends on the second letter' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Game Theorist Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Sion said: +support Tac have it, why not pd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙯𝙚 Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 (edited) Would make more sense and stop people from screaming RDA. And also take less time for a simple weapon check + Support (Should be standard for all gov) Edited March 14, 2020 by Freeze Former S.W.A.T Commander & J.M.T Member Quote Best driver of the year award Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterson Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 +Support Would make sense for pd to have it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springs Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 52 minutes ago, Masterson said: +Support Would make sense for pd to have it YES |Ex PD LT|Delta squad RCT| Ex senior moderator| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonto Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 9 hours ago, Sion said: +support Tac have it, why not pd Retired PD Major | Long Time GL Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killer. Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 9 hours ago, Sion said: +support Tac have it, why not pd I honestly forgot that they don't have it Killer | Gaminglight Member Since 2016 | Retired PD Colonel l State Major l SPRT Co-Commander l FBI Assistant Director l UMC Level 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannah Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 +- support if this gets added there should be guidelines for people don't randomly random weapon check people SWAT PVT Hannah XR39-CPL Hannah King XC65 - Hannah King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quangasaurusrex Posted March 14, 2020 Author Share Posted March 14, 2020 40 minutes ago, Hannah King said: +- support if this gets added there should be guidelines for people don't randomly random weapon check people you could say that about any unit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheJayden Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 5 hours ago, Masterson said: +Support Would make sense for pd to have it TheJayden | Retired PoliceRP PD Colonel | Retired/Reserve Delta Squad Second Lieutenant | Street Crimes Unit Co-Commander | Member of Gaminglight since March 29, 2018 | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocco_Rex Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 -support There will be too many cases/accusations of people running up to someone and random weapons checking Retired as IRP assistant head game master, IRP SNR admin, PRP admin, IC Commander, SRT 2LT, EMS Head Deputy, FR DEFR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghosted Posted March 15, 2020 Share Posted March 15, 2020 18 hours ago, Sion said: Tac have it, why not pd I dont recall Tac having it anymore but my opion is below 7 hours ago, Hannah King said: +- support if this gets added there should be guidelines for people don't randomly random weapon check people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero X Posted March 15, 2020 Share Posted March 15, 2020 +support why not, they are cops???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pooders Posted March 15, 2020 Share Posted March 15, 2020 5 hours ago, Rocco_Rex said: -support There will be too many cases/accusations of people running up to someone and random weapons checking yea this could cause a lot of problems There are wounds that never show on the body that are deeper and more hurtful than anything that bleeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head of Staff Will Posted March 15, 2020 Head of Staff Share Posted March 15, 2020 +Support Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killer. Posted March 15, 2020 Share Posted March 15, 2020 4 hours ago, Ghosted said: I dont recall Tac having it anymore but my opion is below Tac does have it, atleast DS does and I believe FBI Have it aswell Killer | Gaminglight Member Since 2016 | Retired PD Colonel l State Major l SPRT Co-Commander l FBI Assistant Director l UMC Level 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quangasaurusrex Posted March 15, 2020 Author Share Posted March 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, K1LLER said: Tac does have it, atleast DS does and I believe FBI Have it aswell So does cert and state 2 hours ago, Pooders said: yea this could cause a lot of problems It would cause more good than harm, also anyone who is a LCPL can apply for state, who also have it. 8 hours ago, Rocco_Rex said: -support There will be too many cases/accusations of people running up to someone and random weapons checking Gonna need evidence then. If they get arrested, they will need a reason for a valid search. (e.g. a terry frisk), otherwise its against the 4th amendment. -> demote if invalid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocco_Rex Posted March 15, 2020 Share Posted March 15, 2020 It will be near impossible to prove it was an illegal search without video Retired as IRP assistant head game master, IRP SNR admin, PRP admin, IC Commander, SRT 2LT, EMS Head Deputy, FR DEFR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crease Posted March 15, 2020 Share Posted March 15, 2020 The weapon checker is a very dangerous tool. Easy to justify it's use and can lead to 10 years prison time instantly... May cause confusion with new players who are unfamiliar with it. Also, there are no server wide guidelines for weapon checker usage. If implemented for PD, I'd highly recommend a comprehensive section in PD handbook of when it can be used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Posted March 15, 2020 Share Posted March 15, 2020 -SUPPORT Random officers and check someone an take them to jail. This gets rid of the roleplay aspect. Horrible idea that would ruin roleplay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quangasaurusrex Posted March 16, 2020 Author Share Posted March 16, 2020 10 hours ago, Bird said: -SUPPORT Random officers and check someone an take them to jail. This gets rid of the roleplay aspect. Horrible idea that would ruin roleplay You can say that about the handcuffs that and other departments? 15 hours ago, Rocco_Rex said: It will be near impossible to prove it was an illegal search without video Better get to recordin then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ender Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 On 3/14/2020 at 6:12 AM, Freeze said: Would make more sense and stop people from screaming RDA. And also take less time for a simple weapon check + Support (Should be standard for all gov) 12 hours ago, Crease said: The weapon checker is a very dangerous tool. Easy to justify it's use and can lead to 10 years prison time instantly... May cause confusion with new players who are unfamiliar with it. Also, there are no server wide guidelines for weapon checker usage. If implemented for PD, I'd highly recommend a comprehensive section in PD handbook of when it can be used. 1 Ender | Former SWAT Lieutenant | Senior Low Command | SWAT FTO | Previous PoliceRP Administrator COL Will 1L52 to admins: Max, you ain't going to scare them, you are on a female model and stuttering... "So what're you doing?" - @SWAT LT Ender 22-D "Putting my clothes back on". - @SWAT SFC Nao 27-D "There's a fine line between right and wrong. And somewhere, in the shadows, they've sent us to find it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utetwo Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 On 3/14/2020 at 5:12 AM, Freeze said: Would make more sense and stop people from screaming RDA. And also take less time for a simple weapon check + Support (Should be standard for all gov) Totally agree. There's no reason not to add it. Currently a member of the Support Team, SRT, Dispatcher, EMS, and PD SM. Former Senior moderator, SWAT, Event Team, Secret Service, DD, and State Police. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannah Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 On 3/15/2020 at 10:25 PM, Quangasaurusrex said: You can say that about the handcuffs that and other departments? Better get to recordin then Other departments are stricter than pd and also are more trusted. On 3/15/2020 at 10:25 PM, Quangasaurusrex said: You can say that about the handcuffs that and other departments? Better get to recordin then Some people's potato computer's can't Handel recordings with out bad lag SWAT PVT Hannah XR39-CPL Hannah King XC65 - Hannah King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts