Jet Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 (edited) What you want to see? - I want to see CI limited (by either rank or numbers of foundation on) on the amount of SCP's they can breach Why should we add it? - Because some days there is only Security on and CI literally lets out every SCP on and the site just gets nuked because of it What are the advantages of having this? - It will stop a lot more nukes being used as well as increase roleplay among SCP's (More testing, Requested Testing, etc) Who is it mainly for? - CI, SCP's, Foundation Links to any content - N/A Edited February 23, 2019 by Jet TZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timm Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 +Support Limit it to like 1/3 of how many scp's are on or something like that. ⦗MilRP: Spetsnaz SCOL | Retired SZ and DI Major General || JvS: Retired Sith Council | Reserve Sentry Darth | Retired Administrator⦘ ⦗IRP: R DT SPC DD9 | R 31st LTCOL || SCP-RP: R HOR & HOS | R CI MSGT⦘ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polar Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 +support Great idea! Retired E11 Commander Polar Doctor L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdogz1 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 +Support Gets annoying when like 3 CI sneak in and create a site-wide containment breach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 From what I was told. Ci shouldn't be breaching SCP's that nobody is on. So + support. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
th3 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 14 minutes ago, Chief_ said: From what I was told. Ci shouldn't be breaching SCP's that nobody is on. So + support. This suggestion doesn’t address that issue at all. -Support Security in my mind shouldn’t be just in lcz, they also patrol HCZ and alert better equipped Task Forces/Security about any Containment breaches. ~Deputy Site Administrator th3~ SCPRP Head of Staff Lead Discord Administrator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emoo Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 On 2/18/2019 at 1:13 PM, bdogz1 said: +Support Gets annoying when like 3 CI sneak in and create a site-wide containment breach. 『Retired Head of Staff on ImperialRP』 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berserkrpups Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 (edited) On 2/21/2019 at 11:55 AM, th3 said: -Support Security in my mind shouldn’t be just in lcz, they also patrol HCZ and alert better equipped Task Forces/Security about any Containment breaches. 1 1 I have one or two things to add is that there is a branch of CI that do that exact thing and is tasked with the breaching of SCP's. Chaos Insurgency is tasked with causing as much chaos within or for the foundation to deal with. Plus whenever I am on my CI job raiding we will sometimes see the occasional MTF/NTF groups but we barely see a small security detail patrolling in the HCZ. And there is already a timer on when SCP's can breach to where they would have to wait in order to get breached again. There is also never enough researchers on it feels like as they either just don't do testing or don't even attempt to do their job. Edited February 23, 2019 by ߷Berserkerpups߷ Big Body Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Posted February 23, 2019 Author Share Posted February 23, 2019 12 hours ago, ߷Berserkerpups߷ said: I have one or two things to add is that there is a branch of CI that do that exact thing and is tasked with the breaching of SCP's. Chaos Insurgency is tasked with causing as much chaos within or for the foundation to deal with. Plus whenever I am on my CI job raiding we will sometimes see the occasional MTF/NTF groups but we barely see a small security detail patrolling in the HCZ. And there is already a timer on when SCP's can breach to where they would have to wait in order to get breached again. There is also never enough researchers on it feels like as they either just don't do testing or don't even attempt to do their job. Correction, NO self breaching and also it isnt fun when you have to nuke so much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berserkrpups Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 Yes, the self breaching has been removed I am aware of that and nukes don't happen as often as you make them seem and even if a nuke were to happen so what RP just gets reset and people move on. Yes, it might interrupt RP but you have MTF, NTF, and Security all of which is to help prevent SCP's from getting breached/captured. My point is that SCP's are really restricted since some or more of the researchers barely do any researching due to rank or the defcon levels due to a minor breach from SCP's or a minor CI raid. Plus the only way to ever get breached as an SCP is through CI raiding so that is why I think that this is a strange suggestion that is all. 2 Big Body Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadShot720 Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 -support it is our job as CI to breach SCPs jet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobqer Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 -support if the scps cant self breach and theirs a lot scps on some people are not going to have fun because they may not be able to do as much damage as another or be a priority target for ci just because they have a limit on said scps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange 🍊 Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 -support Preamble: One of the purposes of the CI is to cause Chaos. As a member of CI we are always outnumbered in the foundation, and most raids to not go successful, this topic originally was brought up to me by Jet when I had done a duo raid, we were completely outnumbered with atleast 5 MTF on at the time and 10+ gensec, that raid did not result in a nuke, but lead to the breaching of every SCP (that were on at the time) which were all eventually contained. I feel like the problem starts at the foundation, they should not worry about the SCP's running lose, but initially worry about the CI that are causing this issue, and then focus on re-containing the SCP's. Another fix is to enforce that SCP's have to target everyone even CI (Us CI even try to tell them that they cant team with us) , and if caught immediately remove the person from there SCP job. These are just suggestions but limiting the number of breaches that the CI can do is not the way to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Posted February 23, 2019 Author Share Posted February 23, 2019 To all those pointing out CI is supposed to cause chaos, yes they are but in lore they dont breach scp's fifty times a day so yeah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethical Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 15 hours ago, ߷Berserkerpups߷ said: I have one or two things to add is that there is a branch of CI that do that exact thing and is tasked with the breaching of SCP's. Chaos Insurgency is tasked with causing as much chaos within or for the foundation to deal with. Plus whenever I am on my CI job raiding we will sometimes see the occasional MTF/NTF groups but we barely see a small security detail patrolling in the HCZ. And there is already a timer on when SCP's can breach to where they would have to wait in order to get breached again. There is also never enough researchers on it feels like as they either just don't do testing or don't even attempt to do their job. 8 minutes ago, Official Orange said: -support Preamble: One of the purposes of the CI is to cause Chaos. As a member of CI we are always outnumbered in the foundation, and most raids to not go successful, this topic originally was brought up to me by Jet when I had done a duo raid, we were completely outnumbered with atleast 5 MTF on at the time and 10+ gensec, that raid did not result in a nuke, but lead to the breaching of every SCP (that were on at the time) which were all eventually contained. I feel like the problem starts at the foundation, they should not worry about the SCP's running lose, but initially worry about the CI that are causing this issue, and then focus on re-containing the SCP's. Another fix is to enforce that SCP's have to target everyone even CI (Us CI even try to tell them that they cant team with us) , and if caught immediately remove the person from there SCP job. These are just suggestions but limiting the number of breaches that the CI can do is not the way to go. As a CI SGT I can tell you that during raids when we do see MTF/NTF we get wiped most of the time due to juggernauts or more numbers on them but the times we dont see any we can go and release SCPS as that is what we do we casue chaos its our name and we can breach SCPS as many times as we want JET and in LORE CI has a no limit supply of troops therfore they would not care how many people we would have to send to breach one SCP. -Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Posted February 23, 2019 Author Share Posted February 23, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Ethical said: As a CI SGT I can tell you that during raids when we do see MTF/NTF we get wiped most of the time due to juggernauts or more numbers on them but the times we dont see any we can go and release SCPS as that is what we do we casue chaos its our name and we can breach SCPS as many times as we want JET and in LORE CI has a no limit supply of troops therfore they would not care how many people we would have to send to breach one SCP. -Support Don't appreciate the disrespect intended in this post tbh Edited February 23, 2019 by Jet TZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethical Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 There is no disrepect gone twords you at this post this is meant to be a defending post for CI as there were no facts on lore or any good evidence for this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skela Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 - Support Here's why. For the CI to not be able to breach SCP's is like saying, we can't do experiments towards scp as Research & Development. Not only that, but it's three set of teams, vs 1 CI group. SCP roleplay, should all be simple and organized. Also having everybody equal. SCP barely have any chance to get out. From multiple personal experience where the foundation doesn't seem to care and or want to do anything with the scp. Only some researchers does, and since scp can't self breach, it make scp boring. CI is already in a tight circle as it is. Yuh imm@ Thash Dat B¡tch!!*^€{ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandrew Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 I Support This But No One Care About My Opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioDemon Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 -/+ +Less Breaches -Don't add this rule until self breaching back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigJohnny Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 On 2/23/2019 at 2:18 PM, Who R U said: - Support Here's why. For the CI to not be able to breach SCP's is like saying, we can't do experiments towards scp as Research & Development. Not only that, but it's three set of teams, vs 1 CI group. SCP roleplay, should all be simple and organized. Also having everybody equal. SCP barely have any chance to get out. From multiple personal experience where the foundation doesn't seem to care and or want to do anything with the scp. Only some researchers does, and since scp can't self breach, it make scp boring. CI is already in a tight circle as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lefty Posted February 27, 2019 Share Posted February 27, 2019 On 2/18/2019 at 8:11 AM, Timmemes said: +Support Limit it to like 1/3 of how many scp's are on or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
タイムレス?スパルタ Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 I will say this as the CI Commander. We have a set goal of a single SCP to test on if we have RnD on. If no RnD are on though. The CI's goal is to cause chaos and give the foundation a hard time. Breaching alot of SCP is the point of giving the foundation a hard time. If we can't breach alot of SCP, we usually let some of the SCP we captured go to cause some havoc. usually they turn on us sometimes and kill majority of the squad alone. While if we have an captured SCP and try to test on it. MTF is usually raiding us within 5-10 minutes for having an SCP. We don't get much time to even test or document anything before we are all "shot dead" and have to apply to NLR. And usually we can't get far past even gate A if there is even like 2-3 MTF. They usually kill entire squads of up to 7-8 by themselves. So sad to say it pal. -Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts