Jump to content

starr

Member
  • Posts

    607
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by starr

  1. @NetworkParadox no no, like GOC is a group, different people, ranks, tasks, locations, and operations. It's a little more difficult than a GOI because it's less specific, and the SOP doesn't near scratch the surface of all the different stuff they do and what they would if they were in the server (besides just raiding). I like the ranks but like make a whole branch and division of the GOC do you understand? Adding just "GOC" would be an entirely new Foundation but on surface. Like make it into a travelling group or station at one of the town buildings.
  2. @NetworkParadox Yes but what GOC?
  3. @NetworkParadox No I -supported cause there's no need for a suggestion for an SOP You are better off finding a GOC and making a suggestion to add them to the server, and SOP would be made by branch leaders not a suggestion.
  4. -support I think we should leave SOPs to the branch leaders and SA, though you may have stuff in there GOI/GOC may use there's no reason for a Global SOP. There's also the issue of who would get edit access and who would update these. Not necessary Also if you want to be a part of editing a new branch wait for it to actually get on the server then apply! You may get accepted then you can make these changes, not a suggestion.
  5. +support My only issue is a lot of people lately have been finding this model pack and a lot of people want to use it :|
  6. +/- support I'm more mid ground on this considering 999 barely heals much HP anyway.
  7. +/- support Leaning - support So getting into this and review the pack I've noticed a couple of things but first, this pack would fit a good size compared to our now current two prop packs, only if you are replacing the packs however. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1473753431 - 122 MBs https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=284266415 - 56 MBs Onto my main opinion on this, so I like the older retro kind of vibe I get from this and for its size we have quite the potential here, however, I like the props we have now and don't really have any issue with the current ones. And through a review on this prop pack I've noticed a lot of props that wouldn't help our current map and props that are placed now, in fact, more than half of these props are either huge and need to be blacklisted right away or are just not needed or going to be used at all to replace our current ones. Maybe a good idea but this pack just isn't the one to help the server and replace our current ones. If this suggestion was to add this pack to our current props then a most certain no because this is not worth it.
  8. Remove inactive the inactive owner not the class. I'm personally ok with purchasing a steamID removal and like, "Owner Addition" for like 30 bucks but people have put money into the class most times over the time so it only seems fair.
  9. I don't believe it's like RND, actually, there is a lot of creativity behind this, it just doesn't need the amount ranks of a normal branch compared to military or such as that.
  10. Yeah I think it's better to make a side job be the research division, or vice versa with military @GLaDOS I personally don't mind the ranks but you would have to make the engineering (or military) part of the branch smaller for the other one.
  11. The head of the branch would most likely have to cooperate with Gamma to get some ideas and middle grounds in, and to the research thing I think would be more shortened down to a sort of "side job" since this branch right now is huge @GLaDOS if you could evaluate on that. Lastly I actually quite like the idea of more SA in general. First, to what was stated above, however, with this in mind, there might be an Application system that would fill up most slots from the start, it's the same as any introduction to any new branch (or dying one)
  12. woah... holy hell I like this already +support
  13. +support honestly, we should have blinking back into the fray! so I can scare the hell outta people again.
  14. +/- support I wish the teaming was more accepted with how many scenarios it could cause to enhance RP, however, it isn't. So, in this case, it would not only have to enable CI to have Development again, which people may not like but also have SMT to work on an entirely new set of MOTD rules for this branch and CI's Development team. Though I believe this change would be great, it's not only a big one, but also would be too late into the server's lifetime to really implement correctly. There is no issue with putting people into the branch as the server has been doing extremely well, however, it would just include a lot of implementation and new bases for CI and MTF as a whole. More additions to CI's Development and military would have to make as well as with this entirely new MTF branch and new sets of SOPs and rules to follow along, even if it is possible and people would be able to do it. Teaming and along with SCPs as a whole right now just can't fit together with no matter how much I or other people may want to be apart of or even run a creative branch like this. TLDR: Love this idea, but I don't think it's possible. @[GL] M-2033 but also please keep in mind that most of these weapons and stats would be changes even if this were accepted because it seems a little dramatic on some.
  15. +/- support Though I like this idea, the execution seems flawed here, RCF may need a change but intervening with MTF this heavily may not be the right path. Maybe a more subtle approach with a less huge amount of update.
  16. starr

    Phill ET Report

    they can to help an event, it obviously would be needed if their is an SCP or just a spectator for the event to help, however, it's a little weird when you're an Ethics committee member and while he's just casually walking around checking different areas he would just noclip to get to the next closest area instead of walking. The map is easy to memorise and is not a huge size, so there is just no need to be RPing and use a ET power when it doesn't fit the character. That's the basis of my point here, he was RPing and walking out Gate A then threw me in, there wasn't an reason from his RP character.
  17. could just do 5 and split the 10 in half, then everyone is happy
  18. +support Will help bring Bright into a new and improved light, maybe even an actual research class.
  19. what rang said, though it's annoying as hell, raiding isn't meant to be easy.
  20. I know this guy, chill guy, huge +support
  21. +support I think it heavily goes based on timing but MTF camp areas anyway so I don't see the issue with making it a little bit harder.
×
×
  • Create New...