October

-support reasons above, also your comment was completely unnecessary.

-support I personally do not believe a warn would have been necessary in this situation, but all warns are up to staff discretion. You did tazer rush, you can’t deny that, so is the warn is technically valid.

Absolutely, we have no intent to interrupt RP. The only time that I know of where we interrupted a mass test is when we entered 106’s CC with no knowledge of a mass test going on. Definitely communication is key in those areas.

No it’s totally fine, I’m sorry if I came off as too harsh/rude. It’s a good idea, and I’m glad that you’re sharing your opinion as it’s valid. I just personally don’t feel that it’s added. Again, I’m sorry if you view me as being overly rude or anything.

-support I don’t want to be rude, but I don’t believe that everyone deserves a statue for every little thing or else we’d run out of room.

-support you’re incredibly toxic, and you broke the rules multiple times. If it were up to me you would be blacklisted from 173.

+support that class wall is no longer there. While I miss being able to get up on the barricade we can’t anymore (unless we stand on people’s heads in the research line. +support to everything else as well as those rules really don’t make sense.

Every single one of them are just called “E4”

I don’t want to come off as rude, but this is not how LOA’s work.

-support for this +support for the rest

To quote Inaccurate BEFORE this new rule was added “That SOP rule was more of a suggestion than a rule.” Also, I have never seen that rule enforced.

What you want to see? - A tweak and/or removal of the new rule on CI and non-combatants. Why should we add it? - I understand that there is a struggle to find balance. No one wants these “RP branches” to die out because CI constantly threaten them, but the new rule is far too restrictive on CI, and they see no advantage to it. At the moment, no one in CI (excluding sleuths and Maynard) can kill or shoot utility and we have to let them do “their RP.” In return they can’t call us out, but 9/10 times that we see utility we’ve already been called out. Furthermore, it doesn’t make sense (RP wise) to have a janitor going around on defcon 2 cleaning things. I understand that you guys are trying to “make it fair for everyone,” but this rule only hurts CI. From what I’ve heard, there was no consultation with CI command before this rule was implemented. (Yes Aleks is talking with them, but that’s after the rule was implemented). What would I like to see: a reversion to the old rule, CI won’t kill you as long as you comply and don’t do stupid things ie “holding a weapon, running away, etc.” I understand that this is a semi-serious RP server, but you have to remember that CI is a group of terrorists and war criminals who believe in killing as many as it takes (including their own) to create the perfect world/society. Let’s talk about E4, they are the most redacted unit there is. If you’re below the rank of COL and you even utter their call sign you risk termination. Why would they not be allowed to kill non-combatants. Finally, this rule is unfair because it doesn’t work both ways. Our CI non-combatant classes aren’t protected by this rule. When we try to do research you guys interfere. Imagine this, if there was a rule that stated “MTF cannot kill R&D” I bet people would find it outrageous. What are the advantages of having this? - Just making it more fair. Who is it mainly for? - CI Links to any content - N/A I apologize for the rant, I’m just voicing the opinion of many members of CI. I’m prepared for the flood of downvotes I’m probably about to get lol. Please just try to stay civil in comments

Enjoy your time off, sir.

-support, from my perspective the evidence is unclear

Aleks we need the flamethrower SWEP Change my mind

Couldn’t have said it better. -support

Nah but have you seen the movie Fight Club it’s a poetic masterpiece.

Okay first of all that is my name for him. You cannot call him that (I’m very possessive of my pet names) Secondly, +support

Mint I’m sad to see you go! Sir this is a shame. You’re a great guy, enjoy what you do next, farewell and good luck in Nu7. (you should hop on TTT tho lol <3).

-support I don’t understand how changing the name would inspire more people to fight in there. There’s no real advantage or need to change the name/remodel it.

This would require a map edit. On an old map we used to have this, but to re-add this a map edit is necessary. Anyways if we do do a map edit +support cuz it would be cool.

Nah but Fight Club the movie is good. Anyways, -support it’s completely unneeded and you need to follow format my dude

Welcome back!

He prob just meant “non-combatant” combat classes because typically people refer to utility when they’re talking about the non-combatants.