October

He is, he really “went there” during jackbox

Identical thing to what I said in the other report, that’s not your steamID. Please use https://steamid.xyz/ to find your actual steamID or you can type rp_lookup (your name) while connected to a server. +support

Chief, that’s not your steamID sir. SteamID’s (or atleast on gmod) are formatted as STEAM_0: ... not STEAM_1: ... use https://steamid.xyz/ to find your steamID. anyways, assuming you and fizzy are telling the truth +support (if you go to Fizzy’s appeal there’s a photo of the two of them).

Ew lefty is back lol, welcome back sir.

So I have no evidence but he big meanie and he said he push wamen off balcony pLeAsE dEmOtE or else i cry hard lol

So this looks to me like the foundation test log format, please make sure to make a google doc using the CI R&D format.

You need to give the right steamID, SteamID’s are formatted as STEAM_0: ... not STEAM_1: ... you can use https://steamid.xyz/ or you can type “rp_lookup (your name)” for information. due to lack of evidence +/- support

It also says on the buttons “do not touch without ET permission” -support

+support call me harsh, but I would support a blacklist. He was shooting at people, and later in the video we see him prop abusing. What I support is a warn for “buying guns as 343 | prop minge | ARDMx2” (I think that was x2 in the video). Due to all of that I think a blacklist is necessary

-support while this does sound like a cool idea there are already simply too many (assistant) tac units.

Only for class-D escape artist. All others can.

—DENIED— After review by CI command your application has been denied. You may reapply in 1 week.

That is impossible. Also, please follow the format. The reason this rule is enforced is because props should only be used to enhance RP, and when D-class spawn props it is typically used for mingery. While there are exceptions, the majority of the time it is mingery. Futhermore, D-block is a very cluttered and tight area and spawning props will make that even tighter. -support.

That’s a better shotgun then you realize. I believe during my weapon testing with Zone it killed a 200/200 class in 5 short range body shots. At 26 rounds it’s excessive, but I would support it over some others tho I still think it’s fairly too strong for d-class nor does it make sense for them to have an SMG). If I recall correctly (may be mixing up the Winchesters) this is the weaker of the 2 Winchester’s but it is still a shotgun and can easily overpower GENSEC. (I think this one was 5 shots to kill a 200/200 class but had slower fire rate). Damn I miss this gun, it used to be on the CI PVT class and man it was good. The fire rate on this gun is very high (from my recollection awhile back it may have been changed). There is no way I would this being added. This is not a P2W (pay to win) server and just because you own/buy-in to a CC does not make you entitled to demolish GENSEC. This would only hurt GENSEC morale and it would be overpowered. You also have to consider the lore sense, I understand the idea that prisoners would have shivs/knives, but how would they have guns especially such bulky like shotguns and SMG’s. -support. You can claim I’m biased because I’m ex-GENSEC, but I too am a CC owner, and I don’t believe that we’re entitled to overly powerful stuff just because we paid good money. D-class are not meant to be overpowered, after all they are merely prisoners. Making them too strong can and will destroy the balance of the server.

-support this class literally already exists (pro class-D, the higher ranked donor one). Also d-class don’t get consistent updates since they aren’t a department.

Would you do this on defcon 2 with a known 682 breach tho? Being staff doesn’t absolve one of any crime tho. I’m staff and I still make mistakes. This is a known glitch, and the circumstances make it unlikely that “he would just so happen” to be holding his keys and waiting for the elevator while 682 is breached and CI are in the facility.

A month is a long time. Welp time for some certain special “unethical” situations.

Let’s talk about this, the model has been reported as glitched (as shown by Jakub’s cc link) and SMT should’ve told them to change it. Furthermore, Weiss attempted to still run away while being shot at. I believe he knew he was invisible and was attempting to abuse the glitch to get around them. That is appropriate why? It’s defcon 2 and that doesn’t make sense at all. (Basing off of 1st video). Overall, from my point of view, Weiss is attempting to use known glitches/bugs to avoid combat with CI. It’s a known issue and he is clearly in the wrong.

Mint he’s not suggesting the addition of a rule, he’s suggesting an update to the archaic MOTD that is in need of an update (for example 1 line says that you’re only allowed to shoot 682, 035-1, and 076-2 and all others are failRP). The MOTD can get outdated, and Weiss simply is bringing attention to SMT. -supporting this means nothing. If you want the rule removed go +support Gunther’s post.

—DENIED— After review by CI command your application has been denied. You may reapply in 3 days. Notable reasons that led to denial: incorrect SteamID format (they look like STEAM_0: ...) Failure to meet 75 word limit and other reasons that are possibly not stated.

Thanks for putting the right step forward and apologizing for anything that you’ve done in the past, and thank you for your nice comments.

No, I’m simply stating the verdict by SMT when the class was originally added. I don’t intend to cause an argument, but I (as CI, not foundation) don’t like mass breaches and try to avoid doing mass breach raids because they’re annoying. I believe (I’m not SMT so I can’t confirm), but I believe that SMT shared this sentiment when they were allowing the creation of the class. Before this class was created you had to be a donor to escape, now you simply have to be level 30+. Furthermore, if a random d-class stumbles upon some SCP’s containment being opened he can hit the final button and let them out, but this server isn’t a TDM. Mass mass breaches (meaning consistent 24/7 mass breaches) turn this from an RP server into a TDM server. I personally don’t want that and I don’t think anyone wants it. (Here’s a short moot point): d-class wouldn’t have access to breaching SCP’s from an in RP perspective, but if we go with the assumption that they some how can, it wouldn’t make sense for their primary goal to be to breach monsters that can and will kill them. D-class, through testing, would have a vague understanding of what an SCP is and they’d understand that it’s some sort of monster, so I personally don’t think they should be allowed to mass-breach in general. Exactly lol

The reason behind “singling one class out” is because it’s the only non-donator d-class job that has the ability to breach SCP’s. Yes a regular class-D could attempt to breach 049, but they don’t have a keypad cracker to do so. (Need to be a donor to get one in armory). The rule has been acknowledged, I’ve enforced it and many other staff are aware of the rule. Whatever though, you are right we do need it in the MOTD. tldr: -support

The only d-class job unable to breach SCP’s is the “d-class escape artist” and Weiss simply wants that explicitly stated in the MOTD. He’s not suggesting a new server rule.

No it’s been a rule since the creation of the class. The excuse “it’s not in the MOTD” doesn’t mean it’s not a rule, sir. Anyways 939 breaches are boring lol.