Jump to content

Redspeeds

Member
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Redspeeds

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Redspeeds's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Reacting Well

Recent Badges

-4

Reputation

  1. Name: Walter Scott SteamID: STEAM_0:0:86867019 Current Rank: LR (APRF) Time in Research (Estimate): About a year almost i believe Why do you believe you should be in Research Command?(100 word requirement): I believe i should be command because i can offer a unique perspective to mass tests and other research projects where the focus would be to connect more with other branches and have something for everyone to do and would also be able to organize and host multi-staged research projects for the entire research department. Another reason as to why i believe i should get CMD is that id be able to represent the EU timezone in research so that we can more accurately log activity and pickup rising stars from the research branch. What can you bring to the table that others can't? (100 word requirement): Ill be honest here everyone can do what i can but maybe not as good or as creative. One thing that is my strong suit is the ability to organize and get stuff done. One of the things i can bring to the table as i have said above is multi-staged projects giving research a thing/theme to work towards to reach a conclusion. Another thing i can bring to the table is increased EU command activity and my experience as a former event team member would allow me to setup some amazing experiences for research to experience. So that is what i can bring. What would you do to better Research and increase activity? (100 word requirement): Id like to revive or create a new subbranch to decrease boredom among some of the more senior researchers the broad idea of it would be a group of researchers working for the ethics committee focusing on the moral implications of a experiment or test. Another thing i look forward to as said multiple times in this application is working on larger projects to allow research to run more in depth research into a subject instead of short small experiments and who knows maybe we will discover some new SCPs in the process which would allow us to do even more research. Notes: Hey there just wanted to say im really not that good at writing application i did my best on this but if you spot any mistakes let me know so i can fix them.
  2. I and skela already fixed this but im not 100% sure if it will survive the restart if it doesnt someone from SMT will need to perform some dark magic to fix it
  3. Lore Name: Walter Scott Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:86867019 Rank: LR Activity Level: 7/10
  4. Name: Walter Scott Rank: IA Call Sign: N/A Discord#1234: RedSpeeds#0001 Suggestions/Complaints/Concerns/Extra: N/A Do you wish to remain apart of R&D: No
  5. His extensive experience as a player and his previous warnings for FailRP made me give him a warning instead of a verbal. He has 6 weeks of playtime he should know better period
  6. Foundation staff Rules #3 "or in defense of other non-combatants only." No other medical staff was near 076-2 made a report and 066 made a report against nefario engaging SCPs.
  7. You attacked 2 SCPs without provocation. Enough said. Also you said and i quote "I shot 076-2 to distract him from the MTF he was chasing" Which goes directly against the non-combatant rule
  8. Name: Walter Scott Rank: SFC, FTO SteamID(Ex: STEAM_0:1:174348602): STEAM_0:0:86867019 Current Sub-Branches your in: Wardens Riot Sniper Why should you retain your rank (Command ONLY | 150+ words): N/A Any Notes, Questions, or Concerns?: N/A
  9. Alright let me start of by apologizing for taking the sit it was not my intention to give the feeling of bias nor did I mean to overstep the rules I saw him shooting me while loading in and as of late I have been trying to be more strict with people killing afk people while I do believe the warning was valid I should have not been the one to give it to him I have already asked SMT to remove his warn on that basis and this report is evenly valid on that basis. All I can say is sorry and all I can do is promise it won't happen again
  10. Let me amend my statement. I apologize for warning you even tho you broke the rules which you admitted I should not have been the one to execute the punishment even tho I believe other staff remember would have reached the same conclusion as I would have considering your previous record I should not have been the one doing it for that I am sorry I'll contact SMT to approve the appeal unless they feel the punishment fitted the crime again my apologies for bringing you into this situation
  11. Id agree with you however this sit was done based on logs alone no opinions or biases were there he had 2 priors for RDM otherwise it would have been a verbal warning instead of a warning
  12. You just admitted to ARDM since you shot me and logs back that up as well the warn is valid in my opinion. Next time call a staff member to move someone out of the way because you shouldn't shoot/stab people because their in the way
  13. +support Its SCP related its a global game server not a community server so i dont think its that big of a deal as long as he never does it again Also he was probably linking it because someone asked for it it doesnt seam like he was actually advertising for it but i could be wrong
  14. Edits have been made to suggest giving !slay to SMOD and !kick have been removed with the announcement of the new command
×
×
  • Create New...