starr

im chill with 939 hearing tranqs, bruh this keter is easy as hell to RC once called out. He also cant run after waking up from the tranq after 10-15 seconds so like... easy bruh

+/- support +cause it's a good rule to enforce of getting shot at and just running to bunks or when gensec see dclass with guns and run back into bunks and announce it -cause a new set of saferooms and making a whole set of rules/jobs for foundation staff it'll complicate a lot of things

+/- support I agree with this and it's cool and all but can we have a rank requirement cause having people just flag up to a JR researcher to contain them would be annoying as hell.

-support There is a word minimum, it isn't that high, not hard to make a good app. Didn't follow format.

+support So I know you pretty well and you know what you're doing, appreciate that, and you filled out this app nicely for a low the requirements are. There may be a slight learning curve to this branch for you and it might take some time to learn. Though I'd like to see you boost up in activity for this branch

+/- support Never seen you before and you just kinda scrape by with the word minimum Also, TS is required in 90% of branches so I hope just looking at this you goto the tutorial section of the forums and download is However, staying in CI is harder than the training so go ahead, better show dedication though.

<3

ig +support

+support

+support Tho my boi is on LOA he's worked hard and deserves this. Gl u old mfer

+support

Ingame Name: starr What rank are you applying for: CI Colonel Why should we allow you to have this position? (At least 300 words): The branch seems to be hitting a low I suppose and needs numbers, however, ignoring the obvious I’ll go in and say a couple of things to note for this application. First off I love this branch and don’t plan on changing it too much considering that the way that the old members ran it great and I’m not going to change that old way, but to improve off of what is already there. I won’t lie to anyone and I’ll admit that I will most likely have to change things eventually or just have to due to it being a “poor” rule. Other than that I can promise respect to others much like I did with A1 (and where the basics of HCMD still apply from there as well) and that is to be fair to each person whether that be punishments and/or promotions seen fit. Including that as well, I was previously HCDM before and I see that I can be applicable for it once again into a branch in the need of it, if necessary, and I will put my absolute best into the job like it were my A1 position before. This branch is one that will be different from A1 and I understand that, however, being in CI HCMD I have people before that I can ask for assistance if no one else can and if anyone has issues with my command then I’ll gladly hear them out to see how to fix it if it’s a bad issue. I also will accept punishments if needed and give a professional outlook on the situation with a learning experience from each issue that arises, because there will be ones that show up so that I can give a better input/output next time around. It’s a risky application but I believe myself to be ready as I’ve spent some time in CI now, being in it a couple of times, and also having the previous HCMD basics of knowledge for it. Lastly, to mention I will gladly work with my other CMD and HCMD, it’s something that is always needed and I respect that fully if any problems or work is needed to be done I’ll be on top of it right away. I, and hoping many others, can work on the branch if needed and take the positions needed to help it whether the help is needed or not. How would you lead the branch? (At least 100 words) (High command apps only): I will lead this branch to the best of my, and other HCMD, abilities. There were many good things about the leading of the previous HCMD and luckily for this branch much of that really doesn’t need to be changed but just maintained and I can hold a word to that. As lowest I’ll most likely need to doc work and I’m fine with that job considering I did it for ages in A1 without help. As mentioned before I will gladly work with my others to make the branch the best possible, take any criticism and work, and lastly make sure everyone else is holding to the standard they promised as well. I will put honesty into this last, however, the time I’ve spent in this branch varies from the times I’ve gone in and out because of the work on A1. That and competing with (most likely) Corner for this position I’ll gladly take the lower one, and just generally others that deserve it more than me. How active would you be? (Longer the better): I can be very active, and very dedicated, hopefully as seen in the past, also as promised in the previously said phrases before. I've taken a few LOAs and the few I've taken I've done work on the side while on them so I can give my best.

peace brotha i promise the best

thanks for getting me into my favorite branch bro

ok buddy u better be lying

not talking for ID CPs for A1, I could care less of those they dont look like they were made in a tower defense game like some of the structures I see raiding.

-support - The past you've had is pretty big to contribute into this application, you can tell because you've been blacklisted and removed from branches. You've even had to change your name to avoid it then got exposed. Sorry but it's too much to look at, not only the past but even with this name you've came in twice on CI and you've minged both times.

So does everyone.  Never seen you before, nor heard of you. This may be a time zone thing, but based off your forum count, I can assume you're new to the server. +/- support - For reason above ^ + For decent effort put in

+/- support + App seems good and you also seem like you have dedication to give - Haven't seen you before and I'm not sure if what you say is for sure or if you're mingy

What you want to see? - Make a rule for MTF not set up checkpoints only for CI, or at least limit them to a few props, unless CI's location is called out for that place specifically. Why should we add it? - Because this rule will allow MTF to actually have to fight CI and not just set up a checkpoint with a crap ton of props or barricades. Also it helps with the RP aspect as it doesn't make sense for MTF to just sit at EZ or LCZ while we're breaching SCP or killing foundation staff, this especially goes for when people set up prop barricades in EZ waiting for CI to enter/exit. Slicing off an entire section of the map from us or literally just blocking or exit entirely is just cheap and kind of meta. What are the advantages of having this? - Well first it just adds to a level of fairness between MTF and CI, we have rules for not breaching SCPs (unless your job is to do so which is very rare) and have a 20 minute raid timer. Considering that it's a real buzzkill when we're raiding and about to get to LCZ and all of a sudden there's a checkpoint for the snipers or negevs for us to get shredded through a doorway, or if they are setting up a CP at EZ office waiting for us to enter. Or on the other side of the coin you have people camp EZ office, cafe, or literally just Gate A just to wait and kill us. So now we have to choose between Gate B (where MTF spawn in and can run out with grenades and mass numbers) or Gate A (where a ton of people will set up kill traps through a doorway). We cannot build in the Facility to help us defend or attack, and it's not like we have the firepower most times to run through and sacrifice men to get to the checkpoint (or the SCAR-20's/G3's and negevs). Who is it mainly for? - CI and MTF (and D-Class as well that don't have the money or stats for firepower like that) Links to any content - CP3.mp4 CP4.mp4