Calamity

+Support Once 076 gets out, he just kills everyone, we cannot kill him since he has so much HP. When he is breached, he can never be killed, as in staying breached for an hour!

-Support Lack of Evidence

-Support - No, you advertised your staff application in ooc asking someone to +Support it and also commented on your own app. Just seemed like you read nothing about the rules and so on. - 11 Post on the forums is very low, I would expect a lot more. - Number 16 is not descriptive at all - Please reapply at a later date, I do not think your fit at all.

Waiting for MiKeY's side and also the video to be uploaded :)!

+ Support - Active - Nice guy - Mature - Knows the rules - Good Reputation - But number 16 needs some work Good Luck ~Calamity

+Support No Idea why is he banned from the server, he is an nice guy!

This has been denied a lot of times, I don't want to repeat myself why that is.

The requirements are SGT to Join SRT+ Lets Start Off With the Facts: - I understand your frustration with how fast they are, the SWEP that they have is currently broken. They should not be able to run faster than cars, or run away super quickly when they get engaged in a firefight. SMT (Senior Management Team) Is working on getting this SWEP fixed, and also in current debate of getting removed completely. - Little do people know, the Commander of SRT agrees that SRT is unbalanced and is overpowered compared to other tactical departments. When speaking to the Commander, he had has some things planned to make SRT less overpowered and more realistic. Which surprised me since the Commander acknowledges these things, and is currently trying to figure out better ways to change his department for the better of the server. That shows a lot about him and SRT Command. - Regarding the armor of SRT, Each tactical department has their own cool abilities that no other tactical department can "obtain". SRT specialty is having more armor, in which was agreed upon that extra armor is a curse but also a blessing. SRT having more armor, they are pretty hard to kill (Which is the point duh), but there is an issue within SRT that gets them killed every single time they raid. Lower ranking SRT members tend to think "I have so much armor, I am Overpowered" and they rush into a tactical situation and get killed instantly. This is a weak point for SRT, in which other tactical departments are more lenient to be strategic and go into raids with less deaths. I do not believe their armor should be nerfed, I find it pretty fair and balanced. - Regarding SRT doing Police Patrols and Pulling People Over: I do not support that SRT can do this. While serving my time within S.W.AT, new members of S.W.A.T kept leaving and joining SRT because they did not like how we were restricted as in we could not pull people over or give tickets. It killed S.W.A.T in which that was not fair to them. I agree that SRT should not be patrolling pulling people over just because they were running a red light or something, that ruins the whole point of "PoliceRP". That takes the job away from Police Officers and makes it so people want to join Tac Departments more than Police. It is unrealistic for SRT to pull people over, you do not see giant bearcats going around your city with armed S.W.A.T members inside pulling people over for tickets. You are crazy if you think that is an ok thing to do around you, the roleplay is terrible in that. In General I feel like all tac-Departments should not be able to do that, and just let Police Officers handle giving tickets and pulling people over for simple issues. Conclusion: - I understand your frustration with SRT, and hopefully in the near future some changes will be implemented to be more fair for everyone. Even though with all of this evidence and facts: With the bright suggestion, You did not fill out the format so -Support

very descriptive, thanks

-Support Why?

Yes that is correct, since Steve did some things to fix the pack

No, he replaced the rule

-Support 1. Honestly there is a low number of low quality playermodels. Many people do not have many choices. Restricting that will not be smart, Zeeptin already stated a similar thing regarding custom class cars. 2. Many people are already paying a lot of money for these custom classes. They are very unique already, only like three custom classes have the same model. let the people get what they paid for. 3. This isn't needed? You don't own any of the playermodels, you cannot "claim" a playermodel and use it only for yourself. It's pretty selfish if you ask me. If you studied copyright, it would shine some more light on the topic.

Yes sir, then I heard they placed it down right after. I had the other staff on duty deal with it since I had to get off, and apparently they kept doing it so this report was made.

unnecessary and will cause 100% more lag

Snar added this rule since government since government just goes flying pasted the base. Definitely does not help with some tactical units going 90 miles per hour. The current basing rule stops government from going in bases with no brains. Forces them to use tactics and to stack up.

I just see this as a new lag problem

There was a reason why those playermodels were removed. Those playermodel packs were massive in size. SMT changed all of the playermodels into some better low size playermodels to help the server run better. So regarding ARU I am just going to say the same thing. So I say a massive no to this, if you guys get your playermodels back. Every other department would complain about the same thing. In all honestly there is nothing wrong with the ARU playermodels. They are fine, other departments have it way worse.

+Support Active always getting on staff to fill ratio knows the rules Great person for admin!

Welcome to the staff team :)! If you need anything you can always contact me!

dude I like them both, maybe Takis a bit more.

1. Sorry you misinterpreted me when it came to the "friendly manner" situation. What I mean was that I did not know the CI, I did not know his name, certainly I had no intention to just insult him. I said the word not in a way towards him, I said it was a verb. If I was insulting him it would be more directed towards him. The difference regarding player dissing is if it was out of character or not. That is something you guys got genuinely confused in and did not think about when taking the sit. 2. When you stated that you got both sides of the story, you said you got that information from a staff member and Boozle. When I was brought into the sit, I did not get to say my part of the story. He just brought me up interrupting a training I was hosting and he was just arguing with Boozle. Then I saw you teleport to him and pulled him aside to talk to him. Then you just warned and returned me, in which that is not a good way to handle a situation. 3. Regarding this issue of "I do not believe a JMT should be saying these things", Yes I agree, I should have not said anything past that point. I did state that in the sit my roleplay intentions, and I will not do it again. I had zero warnings with verbal warnings, I felt like I was mistreated since it was a straight warn with no explanation other than the staff members arguing. In general the roleplay regarding player diss is like that, if the player is saying these things in a roleplay manner then its fine, after a certain point of harassment and things said in chat are classified as player diss. Management has done this plenty of times within SCPRP and PoliceRP. 4. The guy who called the sit on me was actually harassing saying I was going to get warned and continued to harass me after I was warned. Which you guys did not deal with, you specifically just returned him and warned me. 5. Talking to Rang, he agreed on this issue to opposed MTF VS CI Sits. The CI called a staff sit on me, and the person who showed up after was you, a CI. It seemed to be a bias issue which brought up to me. In general he agreed that it is not really player diss, just passes a certain point before it turns into player diss. 6. "Also you did not say this in RP as you did not clearly state this to Boozle nor staff until you were actually brought into a sit." That is not how it works regarding roleplay, everything is roleplay until you state that is it out of character. Do you expect someone to say "It is roleplay" every two seconds? That is what the sever is all about my dude. 7. "What I am getting at is that this was just a enormous misunderstanding and confusion by staff, Calamity, and Boozle which should never happen again" I could see the confusion in the staff members. If there is confusion, you need to go to a higher up and get assistance in which there was a senior admin online. In fact that senior admin was there to see the whole situation and he told me it was not player diss, and supposedly already handled Boozles sit.