Rookieblue

Accepted To have your warn removed, go to the "Bans" Section at the top of the forums, navigate to your profile, find the warning for this appeal, and for the reason on the appeal, link this post.

Deferred - MTF E-11 Command

- Support Just serve the one year out if you really want to show you've changed.

Accepted Thank you for the report. This player has received a warning for mass racism and permanently banned from the server.

Denied You evaded a job blacklist be creating an ALT account. You will serve out your ban sentence. If you are found creating another ALT account the ban will be extended to a permanent ban.

Denied There are no rules preventing GENSEC to go into Lower D-Block and killing D-Class as long as they present an active threat, or have taken threatening action. The evidence provided, which is simply the player in question being on the elevator while it's in lower D-Block, not even in lower D-Block herself, does not constitute evidence of any violation. Further, the reporters multiple statements of, "I'm pretty sure" and "I assumed" for show there is not evidence to support any rule violations.

Why is it FailRP for a member of GENSEC to enter Lower D-Block? Is there a MOTD rule or GENSEC SOP rule that I'm not seeing that prohibits this? @Dr. Shaw likes pizza

You accepted an offer to become Head of Staff with another community, which is against the staff handbook: 7). Staff members are not allowed to hold staff positions with other communities. Whether the community was up and running or not, you accepted the position and at that point were breaking the handbook. Additionally, you decided to keep the fact you had accepted the position secret, rather than informing Igneous, because you know that what you were doing was wrong.

Your appeal was already denied, so I don't know what's in question here.

Denied Based on the evidence and testimony provided this warning appeal is being denied. The researcher in question had a MTF escort at the time of the incident, and the appellate further admits to rude conduct when engaging with research personnel. This behavior in and of itself is not tolerated, and if continues will result in further disciplinary action moving forward.

Accepted To have your warn removed, go to the "Bans" Section at the top of the forums, navigate to your profile, find the warning for this appeal, and for the reason on the appeal, link this post.

While handling other issues I noticed that this player while playing as a D-Class had killed another D-Class 4 times while in upper and lower D-Block outside of the D-Block Fight Club area. I began spectating this individual and witnessed him shoot the player after the player asked, "How can I purchase a gun?" dropping him down to 1HP. An uninvolved D-Class walked up and make a comment that the victim was down to 1HP, at which point this player pulled out a wrench and killed him. This clearly constitutes RDM as there was no RP reason for you to shoot, nor kill him. Additionally, your statement that your character "beats the he'll out of" people he's never seen before does not constitute an RP reason. Additionally, the fact that you killed the same player multiple times further shows that you were either engaging in Mass RDM without looking to see who the character was, or were intentionally targeting this player.

Not really? If it's accepted I could easily ensure everything in the MOTD lines up like I always have?

Easy fix, 079 can't breach SCP's below the breach threshold, further bolstered by the fact that staff have to governor and check roles. People abuse 173 and 106 constantly, they're warned and blacklisted from the job. Same consequences would apply for 079.

Denied

I conducted a check of the logs regarding this incident. According to server logs the 1048-A swep was used at the following times: 1) 1:02:01 PM 2) 1:02:31 PM - Player was then advised via PMs regarding the spamming rule - 3) 1:06:23 PM Based on log evidence this is a violation of SCP 1048-A's rule of: "The SWEP has a 5-minute cool down before it can be used again." per the MOTD. Failing to abide by the cool down does constitute spamming, even if only used twice, but per the logs you failed to follow the cool down on the third usage of the SWEP as well.

How many times was 173 returning suggested before it came back? Besides, this isn't a "add 079 cause it's cool" suggestion. This one is incredibly detailed, with a lot of thought put into it for balancing. To reduce the potential for mingery it could have a high level access requirement as well, such as with 106. + Support from me

No, it's more of a suggestion.

Accepted! Please allow up to a week for any suggestions you have requested to be added in game or on the forums.

If the head of Utility or Technical approves a layout we can perm prop it.

+ Support

Accepted Thank you for the report. This incident was already addressed and handled appropriately by staff in the server at the time of the incident.

Accepted Thank you for the report. This player has already received a warning for his conduct by a staff member on the server.

Denied Based on the testimony and evidence provided this appeal is denied and will remain in place.