Chief_ Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 What are you suggesting? - Some clarifications on certain breach situations with scp's. How would this change better the server? - More clarification Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Scp's won't be able to get out in certain situations Who would this change mostly benefit? - a bit scp's but mainly Non SCP's Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - So I'm thinking of adding these rules to the main scp rules. As currently there are no set rules for these rules. 1. SCP's that are being Fed cannot attempt to kill/infect the people giving them the d-class nor attempt to breach their containment chamber. 2. SCP's are considered recontained when placed back in their containment chamber and uncuffed. SCP's may not attempt to re-breach after being released from cuffs/kill the person releasing him from cuffs till their NLR is up. The reason why these rules would benefit us is that SCP'S don't have too many rules about feeding/being recontained. I think these two rules will help with clarifying those things. 4 Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pills Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 +support would help so 173 doesn't kill me when fixing Former: 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 - 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarGar Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 +support These are like the unspoken rules and should be clarified. 1 Resigned CI CMDR Gar | Former E11 SGT Gar | RRH Guardian Yankee 42 | Former D5 CPL Gar (one of the first) | A1 Steak Sauce I | Farmer Gar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydekore Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 43 minutes ago, GarGar said: +support These are like the unspoken rules and should be clarified. Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Slim Nova Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 +Support -Less rule breaking -More clarification -Overall yea The picture explains what I am. [DATA EXPU-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItzGray Posted July 7, 2021 Share Posted July 7, 2021 5 hours ago, GarGar said: +support These are like the unspoken rules and should be clarified. 1 Current: Former: | RRH Sierra 47 | | E11 LCPL | | MJ | | AR | | Gensec SM | | CI SFC | | CI IA | | M | | Nu7 DHFE Lieutenant Colonel | | HTF A4 Z Viper A4 | | AH1Z Viper | SCP-RP: | Former staff: 6/18/21 -> 11/18/21| | Staff 2x 2/26/22 -> 10/28/22 | | Joined: Apr, 2021~ | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Its Buck Posted July 7, 2021 Share Posted July 7, 2021 5 hours ago, Casanova said: +Support -Less rule breaking -More clarification -Overall yea RETIRED SCP-RP:Delta-5 CPT | Deputy Head G9| Medical DHFW Doctor. | E11 1LT | Head Ranger | D4 Vanguard FF5 | RnD EOI V3 Canibal ImperialRP: MC 1LT Bacon 3817 | DT SGT FF5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blood Stream Posted July 7, 2021 Share Posted July 7, 2021 +support, I thought this was already a given Definitely needs to be clarified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombinator Posted July 10, 2021 Share Posted July 10, 2021 +Support There is literally no reason that an SCP should be allowed to escape during testing or recontainment when you have a breach system in place. Another call by Chief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purple haze Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 On 7/10/2021 at 11:09 AM, Zombinator said: +Support There is literally no reason that an SCP should be allowed to escape during testing or recontainment when you have a breach system in place. Another call by Chief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya Boi Sawrunner Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 On 7/6/2021 at 2:16 PM, GarGar said: +support These are like the unspoken rules and should be clarified. Daddy D Boi |Previously CI SGM XB1 and RAM|Formerly Agent Starboi| CCs: Frank West | Doctor Samuel Hayden | Solid Snake | CI Recon Force | Drip Hank Hill | The O7 Bois (Owner of Sunsetters) The Femboi With The Fubar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Payton | [GL] Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 + support my only issue with it as 682 you should be allowed to kill/breach if they raise your grate then open your cell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kvist Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 +Support to the Breach NLR rule -Support to the Feeding breach rule Fear RP and other procedures should be followed by GENSEC and MTF personnel taking part in an SCP feeding. Hiding behind a rule should not take the place of proper roleplay. If Foundation security fails to exercise proper protocol and an SCP manages to get loose during feeding, that's too bad. I mean, we're dealing with existentially dangerous creatures here. A containment breach during literally any interaction with them is always a possibility. The Breach NLR rule is common sense and should of course be codified into the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgnisNuts Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 On 7/6/2021 at 2:16 PM, GarGar said: +support These are like the unspoken rules and should be clarified. CI CMDRCC: CI Requiem Squad XH-76 Biggest DMC Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toasty Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 On 7/6/2021 at 3:16 PM, GarGar said: +support These are like the unspoken rules and should be clarified. Former: O5-10 "The Mad General" / SCP-RP Head Admin / CI 2LT / Security CPT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 On 7/22/2021 at 2:29 AM, Kvist said: -Support to the Feeding breach rule Fear RP and other procedures should be followed by GENSEC and MTF personnel taking part in an SCP feeding. Hiding behind a rule should not take the place of proper roleplay. If Foundation security fails to exercise proper protocol and an SCP manages to get loose during feeding, that's too bad. I mean, we're dealing with existentially dangerous creatures here. A containment breach during literally any interaction with them is always a possibility. This was my thoughts exactly when I initially wrote the rules. 1 Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted July 26, 2021 Author Share Posted July 26, 2021 (edited) On 7/22/2021 at 3:29 AM, Kvist said: -Support to the Feeding breach rule Fear RP and other procedures should be followed by GENSEC and MTF personnel taking part in an SCP feeding. Hiding behind a rule should not take the place of proper roleplay. If Foundation security fails to exercise proper protocol and an SCP manages to get loose during feeding, that's too bad. I mean, we're dealing with existentially dangerous creatures here. A containment breach during literally any interaction with them is always a possibility. For the rule about feeding and such what I meant is that it should be clarrified for certain scp's that can easily self breach. like 035 he can easily just run out (There is no rule saying he can't) then mtf have to kill him/get killed every time. What I want added is that for any SCP that is not able to easily be killed/isn't able to be fear-rp'd to have a rule like 076's of how he is not able to run out of their containment chamber. So like 939 if you open the main gates he can just run out as you can throw d-class over the ledge. Or with 5208's how they can't run out of their CC since they can easily do that and can't be fear-rp'd to be told to stay in. Because right now only 076 is restricted from leaving his cc while being given a challenger. The SCP's I believe should be restricted from leaving their containment while being given a d-class/challenger is. 5208-GL SCP-035-1 SCP-1265-A SCP-966 scp-098 The reason why other scp's are not on here are because they are either too easy to recontain by either jsut looking at them/fearrping them. Like 173 and 049. But all the scp's listed above have to be murdered to be re-contained and if they breach ever time they are requesting food then it will be them breaching whenever they request food and giving it to them would be useless. Edited July 29, 2021 by Chief_ Put 096 instead of 939 Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jummy Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 21 minutes ago, Chief_ said: For the rule about feeding and such what I meant is that it should be clarrified for certain scp's that can easily self breach. like 035 he can easily just run out (There is no rule saying he can't) then mtf have to kill him/get killed every time. What I want added is that for any SCP that is not able to easily be killed/isn't able to be fear-rp'd to have a rule like 076's of how he is not able to run out of their containment chamber. So like 096 if you open the main gates he can just run out as you can throw d-class over the ledge. Or with 5208's how they can't run out of their CC since they can easily do that and can't be fear-rp'd to be told to stay in. Because right now only 076 is restricted from leaving his cc while being given a challenger. The SCP's I believe should be restricted from leaving their containment while being given a d-class/challenger is. 5208-GL SCP-035-1 SCP-1265-A SCP-966 scp-098 The reason why other scp's are not on here are because they are either too easy to recontain by either jsut looking at them/fearrping them. Like 173 and 049. But all the scp's listed above have to be murdered to be re-contained and if they breach ever time they are requesting food then it will be them breaching whenever they request food and giving it to them would be useless. this +support Research Administrator | R.A.U. Commissioner | External Agent 3 "Oyasumi" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted July 31, 2021 Share Posted July 31, 2021 @Rookiebluego for it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted July 31, 2021 Share Posted July 31, 2021 Accepted! Please allow up to a week for any suggestions you have requested to be added in game or on the forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted August 1, 2021 Share Posted August 1, 2021 Completed! Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted August 1, 2021 Share Posted August 1, 2021 Completed! This suggestion is now in the server Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts