[GL] Fryingpan36 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Post name: When CI brainwashes a Foundation Member they don't have to advert it. What are you suggesting? - That beside having to advert someone is brain washed they say it inside of CI Comms. How would this change better the server? - saying it inside CI Comms will help CI because they can describe the name, rank, and model. ( this will help staff too) (and stop meta game) Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - None Who would this change mostly benefit? - CI and Staff Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion -N/A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rito Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 +Support for saying that in CI comms I believe that is a way to make sure people don't go around faking that they are brainwashed, so telling it in CI comms could reduce meta game and could still be available for staff to see when making sure someone has been brainwashed Current: Nu-7 VCMDR Former: E-11 VCMDR/LT-COL totally didn't get demoted || Event Team Member || CI SFTO 2LT CCs: Snoop Dog Owner || Previous Rho-36 Occult Operative || Used to be Reznov || CI TF2 Heavy || MTF Zeta-0 'Caste Gates' || Tango-12 'Forgiving Hand' French Canadian man || Mbappé fan in the making Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Talos Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 +SUPPORT mtf do be meta gaming tho Best Regards From The Middle East CI General The Middle Eastern Prince The Last Oil Bender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Boekhom Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 7 minutes ago, Rito said: +Support for saying that in CI comms I believe that is a way to make sure people don't go around faking that they are brainwashed, so telling it in CI comms could reduce meta game and could still be available for staff to see when making sure someone has been brainwashed Chad of many names Professional Shit talker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePhilippineDoc Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 + Support for saying that in CI Comms! Metagaming is quite annoying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The CI Zero Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Why yes this will help with metagaming this is something you should take up with RnD command first before making a post but I still like the idea. In the end I will still settle with... +Support "𝘕𝘰 𝘐 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯' '𝘊𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦'𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘵 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯' 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯'?" -Retired CI MAJ Zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cparsons5 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 +SupportI think this will help a lot with metagaming and would make being brainwashed more fair. It is very annoying when you immediately get metagamed after getting sold back or how ever you make it back to foundation. | MTF E-11 CPL | Senior Researcher | HMRCustom Classes: D-Boi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexicanGuy Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 57 minutes ago, Rito said: +Support for saying that in CI comms I believe that is a way to make sure people don't go around faking that they are brainwashed, so telling it in CI comms could reduce meta game and could still be available for staff to see when making sure someone has been brainwashed Former CI CPT| Guts | Mexican “I will protect those who cannot protect themselves. ” —Second Ideal of the Windrunners— Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Fizz-y Soda Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 (edited) -Support The reason why it exists is to avoid staff sits because people aren't aware someone is brainwashed. Just don't be a poor sport... Edited January 17, 2021 by [GL] Fizz-y Soda 2 CI CMDR / CA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enuz 💣 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, [GL] Fizz-y Soda said: -Support The reason why it exists is the avoid staff sits because people aren't aware someone is brainwashed. Just don't be a poor sport... Former Head of Janitorial | HCZ man geer | lvl 70 life wizard | Roblox Clothing Designer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 The reason this rule is in place is because: 1) Informs staff members that there is a Foundation member that might engage in what normally is FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. 2) Informs Foundation personnel they may encounter a Foundation member that may engage in what is normally FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. Because CI personnel don't advertise the name of the person that was brainwashed, and there is currently no way for Foundation personnel to detect when someone is brainwashed, it doesn't provide Foundation personnel with much of a RP advantage. 1 Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTouchdown Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Rookieblue said: The reason this rule is in place is because: 1) Informs staff members that there is a Foundation member that might engage in what normally is FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. 2) Informs Foundation personnel they may encounter a Foundation member that may engage in what is normally FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. Because CI personnel don't advertise the name of the person that was brainwashed, and there is currently no way for Foundation personnel to detect when someone is brainwashed, it doesn't provide Foundation personnel with much of a RP advantage. ^^^^^^^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yato Sensei Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 4 hours ago, Rito said: +Support for saying that in CI comms I believe that is a way to make sure people don't go around faking that they are brainwashed, so telling it in CI comms could reduce meta game and could still be available for staff to see when making sure someone has been brainwashed Joined 09/30/2020Retired 11/12/2022Former Security SFC || Former MTF Omi9 MSGT || Former CI CPT/MAJ || Former Nu7 LTCOL/VCMDR || Former E11 CPL || Former Maintenance Professional || Former D5 CPT || Former Senior Medic || Former Advanced Researcher | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixx Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 2 hours ago, Rookieblue said: The reason this rule is in place is because: 1) Informs staff members that there is a Foundation member that might engage in what normally is FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. 2) Informs Foundation personnel they may encounter a Foundation member that may engage in what is normally FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. Because CI personnel don't advertise the name of the person that was brainwashed, and there is currently no way for Foundation personnel to detect when someone is brainwashed, it doesn't provide Foundation personnel with much of a RP advantage. -Support [ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a frog Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 +support ight but not gonna make a difference in mtf cause its common place to check every high ranking lvl4+ for brainwashing even if they arent so E11 1LT []FORMER CI MAJOR[]Former MTF OMICRON-9 CAPTAIN[]Former Janitorial Low Command[]Former E11 HCMD[Former overseer of D4,Former experimental, Former E4]"The fuck is a ethics committee?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eem Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 (edited) 16 hours ago, Rookieblue said: The reason this rule is in place is because: 1) Informs staff members that there is a Foundation member that might engage in what normally is FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. 2) Informs Foundation personnel they may encounter a Foundation member that may engage in what is normally FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. Because CI personnel don't advertise the name of the person that was brainwashed, and there is currently no way for Foundation personnel to detect when someone is brainwashed, it doesn't provide Foundation personnel with much of a RP advantage. Excactly this. -Support Edited January 17, 2021 by Eem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Fryingpan36 Posted January 17, 2021 Author Share Posted January 17, 2021 16 hours ago, [GL] Fizz-y Soda said: -Support The reason why it exists is to avoid staff sits because people aren't aware someone is brainwashed. Just don't be a poor sport... staff get CI comms you can also describe who it is instead of someone is brainwashed 16 hours ago, Rookieblue said: The reason this rule is in place is because: 1) Informs staff members that there is a Foundation member that might engage in what normally is FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. 2) Informs Foundation personnel they may encounter a Foundation member that may engage in what is normally FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. Because CI personnel don't advertise the name of the person that was brainwashed, and there is currently no way for Foundation personnel to detect when someone is brainwashed, it doesn't provide Foundation personnel with much of a RP advantage. the reason why the suggestion was made was because staff get to know who the person is and get other info about it. this will also help CI not shoot the brainwashed person. If someone attempts to abuse this its as easy as "// is this guy brainwashed" if not make a report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Fizz-y Soda Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 2 hours ago, [GL] Fryingpan36 said: staff get CI comms you can also describe who it is instead of someone is brainwashed the reason why the suggestion was made was because staff get to know who the person is and get other info about it. this will also help CI not shoot the brainwashed person. If someone attempts to abuse this its as easy as "// is this guy brainwashed" if not make a report Yes the staff do, but the people MAKING the sits don't. It's just better if EVERYONE was made aware, so it makes sense if they happen to be the unlucky person that falls victim. CI CMDR / CA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexxxx Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 21 hours ago, Rito said: +Support for saying that in CI comms I believe that is a way to make sure people don't go around faking that they are brainwashed, so telling it in CI comms could reduce meta game and could still be available for staff to see when making sure someone has been brainwashed O5 Former: DT CPT , CGO - Tenn Graneet , 31st VCMDR -> Havoc CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangiatea Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Pending "A good soldier obeys without question. A good officer commands without doubt." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fireman Guy Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 -SupportImagine this: Your a Low Command of lets say Nu7, your walking around and a Enlisted cuffs you and brings you to CI base, before you get there you call a sit cause this is FailRP, you get brought into the sit and you say he FailRPd. The Enlisted says he was brainwashed, and the staff confirms it via CI comms which you do not have. Now you just wasted your time, the staffs time, and the Enlisted's time. Now imagine it how it is now: You get cuffed by a enlisted, you check chat, and see someone's been brainwashed, you do some Fun RP with CI and you get on with your day. See? Also, if the staff wasn't on until like a minute ago, and the enlisted doesn't remember the name of who brainwashed him, it could get someone in trouble/demoted for doing nothing wrong at all. A bigger nerd than ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 On 1/16/2021 at 10:15 PM, Rookieblue said: The reason this rule is in place is because: 1) Informs staff members that there is a Foundation member that might engage in what normally is FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. 2) Informs Foundation personnel they may encounter a Foundation member that may engage in what is normally FailRP or RDM, but is actually in compliance with RP. Because CI personnel don't advertise the name of the person that was brainwashed, and there is currently no way for Foundation personnel to detect when someone is brainwashed, it doesn't provide Foundation personnel with much of a RP advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
![[GL] Fryingpan36](https://gaminglight.com/forums/uploads/monthly_2021_06/1287047760_Omi9logodiscord.thumb.PNG.8a58d7e19b6f1eac8fb2969cafabf487.PNG)
Recommended Posts