Jameshi34 Posted December 26, 2020 Share Posted December 26, 2020 (edited) What are you suggesting? - I am suggesting that the rule where, when tickled, SCP-682 has to return to its CC be changed, or at least limited. SCP-999 as it is right now can follow SCP-682 throughout the facility and tickle him periodically to try to recontain him. I think making it limited, like SCP-999 can only tickle SCP-682 once during each breach would be beneficial. Even changing the rule entirely like making it so SCP-682 is docile for 15-30 seconds after being tickled, and anyone can go up and cuff it, with a limit to uses as well. How would this change better the server? - SCP-999 currently is what seems like MTF's only bastion with the new 682 SWEP. They send 999 out to follow and tickle 682 until they succeed and 682 is recontained. When I was playing 682, Gensec got me down to .5 size and then failed to get me down the rest, but that was still the smallest I'd gotten. The only MTF who even tried to recontain me were Crabbo and a pathfinder who both nearly got me at a checkpoint. I feel like making 999 this op towards 682 takes away from what the MTF are meant to be, the main recontainment force. The argument that 682 is 'too op' with its new SWEP comes up. If you really believe this to be true, make a suggestion to change it. 999 shouldn't be the only thing stopping 682 during its breaches. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - It would make it so 999 isn't nearly as strong against 682 as it is now. It would also make MTF's job harder, but their jobs aren't supposed to be easy either. Who would this change mostly benefit? - SCP-682 Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A Edited December 26, 2020 by Jameshi34 Gensec LTCOL | Deputy Head Warden | S.T.A.R.S. | Michael Jones Enthusiast do you are have stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Fizz-y Soda Posted December 26, 2020 Share Posted December 26, 2020 +Support Yes 1 CI CMDR / CA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Boekhom Posted December 26, 2020 Share Posted December 26, 2020 23 minutes ago, [GL] Fizz-y Soda said: +Support Yes 1 Chad of many names Professional Shit talker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spud Posted December 26, 2020 Share Posted December 26, 2020 +Support 682 is a very powerful SCP that shouldn't be able to be recontained 2 minutes after it breaches. Using 999 to completely recontain 682 anytime it would like seems a bit overpowered to me, I would agree with Jameshi's idea to make it immobilize 682 for a period of time or maybe 999 can only be utilized to recontain 682 if they have been confirmed breached for XX minutes or more. 999 shouldn't be able to do MTF's job single handedly. 2 Armored Shield | Gensec MAJ | EWD | DHFTO | OPRF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yato Sensei Posted December 26, 2020 Share Posted December 26, 2020 + Support But I don't think 999 should be made useless since it is pretty strong against (being able to make 682 laugh is quite the achievement) so I think it should either knock out 682 for 2 - 3 minutes or keep him in place for that same period of time. Joined 09/30/2020Retired 11/12/2022Former Security SFC || Former MTF Omi9 MSGT || Former CI CPT/MAJ || Former Nu7 LTCOL/VCMDR || Former E11 CPL || Former Maintenance Professional || Former D5 CPT || Former Senior Medic || Former Advanced Researcher | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 +Support as of this new update on 682 ive seen mtf/foundation in /ooc chat screaming at 999 players to follow 682 around and continuously roll every 5mins on him. I like the rule in which 999 can only roll once on 682 as it still makes that rp element useful but doesnt make it abusable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head of Staff Frog Posted December 27, 2020 Head of Staff Share Posted December 27, 2020 (edited) +/- Support Its a good idea, but during off-hours it is nearly impossible to recontain 682 with its new SWEP without 999. If there is only a few MTF on, we can't do enough damage to 682 before he chomps on some D Class to keep regenerating and he will end up being breached for hours. I think 999 being able to do this is a good counter to how powerful 682 is at the moment, but if this is accepted I think 682 should be nerfed a bit to compensate for that. Edited December 27, 2020 by frog milk ImperialRP SMT | Head of Staff Head Forums Diplomat Former High Admiral | Former DT Commander | Former State LTCOL | Former SPRT Commander Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rito Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 -Support -682 is already so OP with his new swep, he will be nearly impossible to recontain with this new rule Current: Nu-7 VCMDR Former: E-11 VCMDR/LT-COL totally didn't get demoted || Event Team Member || CI SFTO 2LT CCs: Snoop Dog Owner || Previous Rho-36 Occult Operative || Used to be Reznov || CI TF2 Heavy || MTF Zeta-0 'Caste Gates' || Tango-12 'Forgiving Hand' French Canadian man || Mbappé fan in the making Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixx Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 5 hours ago, vSquishyv said: -Support -682 is already so OP with his new swep, he will be nearly impossible to recontain with this new rule [ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodaㅤ Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 6 hours ago, vSquishyv said: -Support -682 is already so OP with his new swep, he will be nearly impossible to recontain with this new rule Nu7 CPT | Nu7 DHFTO | Head of Degeneracy | Former OH7 | | HSU #1 | Ex Nu7 MAJ | Ex DHFTO | Ex HSU Commissar | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixalgamer99 Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 14 hours ago, Coltable said: +Support as of this new update on 682 ive seen mtf/foundation in /ooc chat screaming at 999 players to follow 682 around and continuously roll every 5mins on him. I like the rule in which 999 can only roll once on 682 as it still makes that rp element useful but doesnt make it abusable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sprink Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 On 12/26/2020 at 12:09 PM, Spud said: +Support 682 is a very powerful SCP that shouldn't be able to be recontained 2 minutes after it breaches. Using 999 to completely recontain 682 anytime it would like seems a bit overpowered to me, I would agree with Jameshi's idea to make it immobilize 682 for a period of time or maybe 999 can only be utilized to recontain 682 if they have been confirmed breached for XX minutes or more. 999 shouldn't be able to do MTF's job single handedly. Deputy Head of Security | Executive Event Team | Admin | Forum Diplomat | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Your Local Soviet Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 +/-Support Now this is a great idea, however it shouldn't dramatically increase the chances of his recapture since I can just see this being abused. Maybe a possible 10 second "freeze" rule could be put in place where if SCP-682 loses a roll against SCP-999 then he can't move for the next 10 seconds due to him laughing and such. Nothing over the top is what I'm trying to say. SCP-RP - Former Assistant Head of Research | Former OMI-9 2LT | Former GenSec 2LT ⋅•⋅⋅•⋅⊰⋅•⋅⋅•⋅⋅•⋅⋅•⋅∙∘☽༓☾∘∙•⋅⋅⋅•⋅⋅⊰⋅•⋅⋅•⋅⋅•⋅⋅•⋅ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The CI Zero Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 On 12/26/2020 at 4:01 PM, Coltable said: +Support as of this new update on 682 ive seen mtf/foundation in /ooc chat screaming at 999 players to follow 682 around and continuously roll every 5mins on him. I like the rule in which 999 can only roll once on 682 as it still makes that rp element useful but doesnt make it abusable "𝘕𝘰 𝘐 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯' '𝘊𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦'𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘵 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯' 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯'?" -Retired CI MAJ Zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyhorse Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 +Rep Because i think that SCP-999 is very useless right now, as he cant do much and is very very rarely tested on. i think this would make more use of SCP-999 but i think it should be added along with not removing any of the old SCP-682 Rules. i think it should be kept as how it is and have 99 be allowed to be used to recontain it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOBeanz Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 -Support I think it's cool that 999 is actually being utilized in an important RP role for recontaining 682. I understand it may be a bit annoying that there's a Meta of using 999 against 682 now, but is it actually a big enough issue to enact changes on? It seems to mostly be RNG whether your breach ends early or not to 999. (And whether a player is even on 999 while you're out.) A 5 minute cooldown between roll attempts still allows for a LOT of carnage opportunity on 682's part, especially with the new 682 Swep. O5-9: "Misfortune" A.K.A. "Mr. Unlucky" "Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexxxx Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 9 hours ago, CanOBeanz said: -Support I think it's cool that 999 is actually being utilized in an important RP role for recontaining 682. I understand it may be a bit annoying that there's a Meta of using 999 against 682 now, but is it actually a big enough issue to enact changes on? It seems to mostly be RNG whether your breach ends early or not to 999. (And whether a player is even on 999 while you're out.) A 5 minute cooldown between roll attempts still allows for a LOT of carnage opportunity on 682's part, especially with the new 682 Swep. O5 Former: DT CPT , CGO - Tenn Graneet , 31st VCMDR -> Havoc CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyhorse Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 On 12/26/2020 at 10:23 PM, vSquishyv said: -Support -682 is already so OP with his new swep, he will be nearly impossible to recontain with this new rule WDYM? it would make it easier because that would be 30 seconds for any MTF to cuff him harm free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balancer Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 On 12/26/2020 at 11:37 AM, [GL] Fizz-y Soda said: +Support Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangiatea Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Accepted! Please allow up to a week for any suggestions you have requested to be added in game or on the forums. "A good soldier obeys without question. A good officer commands without doubt." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevlar_ Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 Completed! This suggestion is now in the server Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts