Wank Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 What you want to see? - Criminals should no longer be allowed to keep someone hostage in public when they are outnumbered by gov. Why should we add it? - I feel like criminals have too much power when they have a hostage. In many instances, people have a hostage in public, get surrounded and outnumbered by gov and yet still manage to drive away with the hostage. I am not asking that you add this restriction for hostages inside buildings where the criminal can not be surrounded. But, I feel if gov. can surround someone taking a hostage, they should not be able to continue that kidnapping. What are the advantages of having this? - Adding this would make it much easier for gov. to counter kidnappings. This would really improve role play on the server and make kidnapping a much harder task. Who is it mainly for? - Government and people that don't want to be kidnapped. Links to any content - N/A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T Chicken Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 +SUPPORT -It's very unrealistic for gov to not be able to do anything if they surround them -This causes alot of in game/OOC arguments because of how weird the rule is right now & how people are trained, so this rule would be amazing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupremeChow Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 -support realistically a hostage taker would have a pistol to the skull of the hostage but gov can already sync awp shots to take down a hostage taker if they think they can with only 1 hostage taker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dredgen Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 - Support If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. PoliceRP: Former PD LT. ImperialRP: Starkiller, former 8th Brother, StarFighter Vice Marshall, 501st CPT, and Admin. MilitaryRP: Captain Price, former USAF Lieutenant Colonel.JVS: Former Darth Vader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drippy Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 40 minutes ago, Dredgen said: - Support If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. PoliceRP - Retired Manager Retired SWAT Commander | UMC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathstriker124 Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 7 hours ago, Dredgen said: - Support If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head of Staff Frog Posted September 13, 2020 Head of Staff Share Posted September 13, 2020 8 hours ago, Dredgen said: - Support If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. ImperialRP SMT | Head of Staff Head Forums Diplomat Former High Admiral | Former DT Commander | Former State LTCOL | Former SPRT Commander Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAZE.. Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 8 hours ago, Dredgen said: - Support If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. I think That this rule is not needed. SPRT Staff SGT OG SGT State MSTRSGT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rein Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 -support If you are going to change the rule it removes more roleplay from the server which is something the server doesn't want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Newsom Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 21 hours ago, SupremeChow said: -support realistically a hostage taker would have a pistol to the skull of the hostage but gov can already sync awp shots to take down a hostage taker if they think they can with only 1 hostage taker Ex PoliceRP- Senior Admin & Senior Event Team | Ex Support | Ex Fourm Diplomat | EX SWAT Commander | EX UMC Mercenary Leader | Ex OG General Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manager Nimo Posted September 13, 2020 Manager Share Posted September 13, 2020 22 hours ago, T Chicken said: +SUPPORT -It's very unrealistic for gov to not be able to do anything if they surround them -This causes alot of in game/OOC arguments because of how weird the rule is right now & how people are trained, so this rule would be amazing 〖 PoliceRP 〗Senior Management Team | Manager 〖 Lead Account Manager 〗 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valentino Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 -support I agree with the people above |PD Captain|UMC LVL 2|Deputy Dispatch Director| "I love the rain" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa (BOH) Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 -support If you are going to change the rule it removes more roleplay from the server which is something the server doesn't want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"Bryan Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 (edited) MAJOR -SUPPORT The whole point of this rule is for government not to put you under fearRP while having a hostage. In the real world one shot would be the usual kill meaning the hostage would die if the cops coming at you with guns. No government wants the hostage to die. This post just makes it look like you want hostage situations to be easier and less roleplay. Edited September 17, 2020 by "Bryan Whether you think you can or you think you can’t, you’re right. - Henry Ford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDerick Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 - Support Reasons Above Derick | Gaminglight Member Since 2016 | FBI Deputy Director Derick RA3 | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Faustin Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 This suggestion makes 0 sense. On 9/12/2020 at 1:12 PM, Wank said: In many instances, people have a hostage in public, get surrounded and outnumbered by gov and yet still manage to drive away with the hostage. THIS IS LITERALLY THE POINT OF HAVING A HOSTAGE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mag1c Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 On 9/12/2020 at 4:51 PM, Dredgen said: - Support If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. State Command | SPRT Commander | PoliceRP Super Admin | SS Agent | FBI Agent | Umbrella Corp Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 Denied. The SMT team for this server has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. PoliceRP Manager Retired SRT Commander | Police Commissioner | Department Supervisor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts