Chief_

Its already in the motd saying you must feed D-class to him. So the rule addition is unnecessary but would be okay.

I agree with the kos prt. But if your saying to dissalow id checks then I say -support. They shouldn’t do that.

I agree. But guys, we aren't going to get this no matter how hard you push for it. Because 1. No format 2. This is uneeded. We use to do this but removed the props. 3. This seems just to be a minge post.

+/-Support +It would be nice to have it clarrified that you can't call kos/aos on an entire branch without a valid reason. Like KOS all of gensec for rebelling because they want better wages, researchers for going rogue. +/-It is already kindoff failrp to jsut call a KOS/AOS on an entire branch just off of one person. But tell me if you mean this for that when we see something suspicious. Like a researcher roaming with CI that we can't have a "Check all researchers Id's". Because if so then full -support. You just have to play it more safe and not get caught.

+Support Do I nee dto say anything else?

I 100% agree. Also why do people think that the suggestion is to allow him to grab guns? It isn't stated that he should be allowed. Anyways if he grabs a gun he will be warned for failrp(Buying Weapons as scp's). As that is not allowed.

Tbh I must agree.

But remember the only exception is 035

What are you suggesting? - certain motd updates How would this change better the server? - getting rules put in that staff have been enforcing/following Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. Who would this change mostly benefit? - scp’s/non scps Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - so these are the rules i’m suggestion A edit to the puppy guarding rule. “Scp’s are not allowed to camp areas that they cannot go in. Ex: Armory, D-block, 106’s cc.” i feel this needs to be added as its not clarified so scp’s dont do these things. “If you are inside of a safe zone from scp’s you are not allowed to shoot at them.” this rule needs to be added because it’s completely unfair to like 682 being shot from armory and he can’t do anything. for the second rule ovbiously it would fall under failrp but people are saying its okay cause its not in the motd and should be stated.

From the application yes he understanda everything read it well. But i’m going to need to go with this. I know its kindoff targeting for your name but you have to remember there are kids on the server. People underage and shouldn’t need to call someone during a sit “daddy”. It would be really bad if their parents heard them just saying things that involve daddy to someone online. For now its mainly -support because of the name. But if you say to not use that name in-game especially while staffing I’ll give a +support.

What this dude said.

That is not your steamid. This is your steamid: STEAM_0:1:597365881 I don't think you'd get banned just for saying the word gay as I don't find it as being homophobic depending on the way you say it. But the thing I am MOST SUSPICIOUS OF Is that ALT account ban on your record. Till @Noah Lee responds I wont leave my side.

LOL. This is just a unfortunate misunderstanding from what I see. +Support

This use to be able to be a thing. Where instead of using a swep it would be a roll off. But that made 035 useless in combat for bw cause nobody rolled off cause they focused on killing. And we had a rule put in place saying the glass prevents that from happening. Sure if the glass was rp broken then I could see him brainwashing someone but overall -support for now.

Why u think wardens have this

Also @PryingTree5796 Make that poll private btw.

Moved to correct area

+Support for well uhm obvious reasons

+Support This would help clarrify that you aren't breached till your cc is lowered fully.

-support Rookie banned you and I don't want to hear about you having a second chance. You had plenty of chances to not be a bad person and get yourself straight. You have had 11 chances to improve yourself and you didnt. Also your lying on your ban appeal not stating the whole reason of your ban. It was "Multiple Incidents of Mass Racism and Mass Homophobia" And if I were to think you should have a better chance I'd hope you atleast write a better dispute.

You on the server? It so dm me your in game name on discord. [GL] Chief#0449 Lets talk

+Support. when i get on the server I’m going to write up a rework

Also ur a minge with that looooooooooooooooooooong steam name dude lol. +support