Jump to content

Chief_

Retired Staff
  • Posts

    2,950
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Chief_

  1. -support Ci and MTF have relatively balanced jobs for their sides. CI being stronger because they have to raid the facility and still don't get out alive all the time. Ci first has praxies fist which made mtf want something of their own. AKA 7101. If Ci get another op/powerful job mtf will want another one to balance them.
  2. This is true. I think it would be nice to have a rule update for this saying "It is fail rp to edit/change your model without a valid rp reason."
  3. I have to ask the same exact question. WHEN I GETTING MY DANG PAYCHECK!!!!
  4. I am going to be leaving a detailed response on this report. Taking each piece of evidence/accusation/etc. and leaving my opinion on it. The False warn reports The false warn reports may have been accepted but there was confusion. With the rdm he may have missed it if he just reviewed the video that you were hurt from the shooting. Then with the Failrp/Puppy guarding warn that was just a confusion on each part. From the rule of shooting scp's from armory to the rule about puppy guarding. But just because warnings were accepted that does not mean they were targeted warns. Each one had sides and he agreed with one over the other and handed out a warn. Although others saw it differently doesn't mean it was a targeting warning. Sub of False warn reports on your testimony/quotes How long were you in lower d-block for? If it was jsut a few seconds/he flew away after claiming the sit. Accidents can happen. As with our report system when you claim a sit you have the option to tp to or bring the person. But you can also bring hte person that was reported. he could've clicked goto and accidently clicked yes when it asked to bring you also. I would like to here from you on this part as this part of my response is subject to change This is something he shouldn't be doing or saying as its unprofessional to harrass/constantly remind a player they messed up. The only time this is okay is if A, the person is in on it and is fine with it, or B its something like "Imagine being a dog" or something like that. Something that isn't targeting a player based on past actions. As people make this joke a lot on the fact its just a joke about jobs/cc's/branches. But it is always to an extent. Banner and Grayson being friends & the Video Related to it Grayson above has admitted that he was just being friendly with the d-class as he was a new player. He was just trying to make the time he had on the server enjoyable and fun to play. Just because they are calling each other on discord does not mean they are friends. I have done this plenty of times myself as it takes a while to trim a video and upload it. Screen sharing on discord makes it faster. The First Video under Evidence I do not see how him saying that you are in sits everyday abusive or relating to this. He may have just seen you getting teleported or there may have actually been sits against or with you. But him saying that isn't abusive of his powers. The first picture The first picture is just a report from another player mentioning this. If its true or not I do not know but it is something to take into consideration and be asked. If there is any video evidence/visual evidence of him of doing these actions then please include them. But I wills ay there should be a talk to him about these even if there is no proof. The DM Pictures about his behavior You mentioned how banner had a sit stolen from him so he could just harrass you. I do not see harassments from the video you posted after mentioning he did this. But I did confirm with the T-mod (Banner) that banner did take the sit from him saying he cannot take RDM cases (Which was wrong as he was past his 5 days as T-mod shadowing). So I can see that it was a bit of targeting if he purposely lied but I would like to hear from @NickenChugget on where he heard this information. Then on the DM from NightSoil, him saying that he has encountered reports of harassments/toxicity from Grayson is something that I'd like to hear more about as I wanna know if there is any video/photographic evidence of this. If not its okay but its something to be greatly considered since there is multiple people saying that he is toxic. Your Testimony/worded evidence If this is true then this is just dissrespectful. Just because someone is being inactive you don't just go saying that to people. If jack was fine with it then that is cool but shouldn't just be said like that. I would like to hear form @[GL] loudyfam (Jack S)if what he said was true and that he said it in a rude tone. If this is true then he is just being petty. There are certain things that are rules but are not so important. Like going into another person's bunk while your right there to collect a reward that's fine. Basically its fine to go into another foundation members bunk if your also foundation as long as its not to minge/be annoying. Now for my decision From reading and reviewing all of the evidence provided/the worded evidence of what you said. Then how there are many people who agree that he has been toxic. I will say this is a +support for me. I feel that grayson should be investigated/watched over/ have to be watched over by a admin or a senior admin+ to make sure that he is conducting his sits properly and is being proper while on the staff job. Although if I had to consider something more drastic, I would say a demotion to t-mod and a retraining/talk to about how to act as a staff member. For the people I quoted please either respond here or dm me on discord ([GL] Chief#0449) or msg me here on the forums about your side.
  5. Its trying to load a lot of things. Its trying to first load all the player names. Which is why when you join you see "you" saying thing sin chat when you havent. Its cause it only has your name in its database. Then its trying to load all the players that are nearby and the map. So it does that. Its normal.
  6. This post has basically been accepted. Rookie locked my post after me confirming with him the rule update. If you look at the sub of rule 4 it says you can't engage them. So its basically accepted.
  7. Any csgo knife or the golf club.
  8. Pepperoni pizza. My old family that I made up XD
  9. TBH +Support. This would A free up some perma props on the server. Then also that the trainees will be in the back and can't just run out easily. Then also a bit quieter.
  10. +Support Although if you are meaning physically moving the entire room over to there then that would require a map change. So, i'm thinking if we do this, we can just move the offices on over to where the training room was. So basically we just swap both the training and the offices.
  11. Forum Diplomat Message This post is being locked till smt handle due to people still commenting +supports. Do not +support on bug reports as its not a suggestion.
  12. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! We can't loose our Otter Super admin ;-; NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! We can't loose our Otter Super admin ;-; NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! We can't loose our Otter Super admin ;-;
  13. Thats already stated. general rules. rule 4 Do not go into spawns/safe zones if you are involved in an RP scenario. This includes combat, or while being chased by a SCP.
  14. -support Leaving in the middle of the sit is not okay. You wait for us to return you, you don’t just swap jobs. Your just purposely breaking rules to get attention. If your just going to not follow rules don’t complain when you get banned. You litteraly got banned for “Mass Minging/NITRP/Always minging on the server when staff are offline”
  15. Thanks. But you missed my 516 days on the staff team for my first run on scp. Then my over 1 year as snr admin in that run lol. Been senior for a while. Should come check out scp. Its fun
  16. Same here. I recognize that name. But in the end were just 2 old gl dudes.
  17. Changed to +support. he changed everything to make it appropriate. Good luck man.
  18. This is a known bug. If people do this its considered swep abuse/exploiting.
  19. What bread said. I'm pretty sure its because the riot shield is to stop bullets/melee attacks. But when you throw the trench knife it becomes a prop. AKA the reason why in the past after a prop issue it was able to 1 hit ppl. And why it said the world killed you when you died to it because its a prop.
  20. Then I give a full +support. It should never be kosing.
×
×
  • Create New...