GAM3

Trial Moderator
  • Content Count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About GAM3

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. GAM3

    GAM3's LOA

    Name: GAM3 Rank: SM Callsign: XB4 Date of LOA Leave/Return: 9/5/2020 - 9/15/2020 Reason (if private write N/A): Well, school makes a complication and I in general need a break from the server.
  2. GAM3

    SCP-096 Buff - Denied

    welp guess they looked at 096 to call him ugly *enraged 096 noises* +support
  3. Actually I do agree with Neos and Da da da's statements. Those are both great ideas!
  4. +Support Although it is not always the damage it is the hit reg, it would be nice to up the damage a bit if not fixing the hit reg. This would even it out because if you can't hit as many hits, you can make up for it with damage.
  5. Post name: “General Suggestion - Add a rule to the MOTD saying thermals expire after 3 minutes. What are you suggesting? - As people say that thermal adverts expire after 3 minutes, I believe that everyone who has access to thermals should have to re-advert thermals after 3 minutes. How would this change better the server? - Well, it would help with fail-rp. I say this because people advert thermals once and for the next 30 minutes they just shoot cloaked units and say, "Oh, I had thermals." Then an admin checks logs to see if they adverted and see they adverted 25 minutes ago. Also for example let's say 966 breaches, MTF calls thermals once and they can't be cloaked pretty much. However if they don't re-advert 966 can have more of breach time. SCP's take a long time to breach themselves, but MTF adverts thermals once and SCP-966 finds it's doom. It's also unfair for cloaked units in both MTF and CI. If one adverts thermals once they meet their demise. This also brings up the fact that it makes it unfair for the other side because they also then have to wait NLR. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Well, it might have chat a little crowded, but the time could be adjusted to 3-5 minutes. Who would this change mostly benefit? - 966, 280, CI Infiltrator, and MTF Stealth Operative. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A
  6. R.I.P, we can't wait to see you back gamer!
  7. Well, D-Class never use the tower anyways. So I don't think we would mind it being level 2. +Support
  8. RP Name: GAM3 SteamID: STEAM_0:1:460390799 Reason of strike: Diss of gensec. Why do you think you should be unstriked. (150 Word Minimum): Well, about a month ago I was striked. I thought it would go away as Skela said, "Don't worry about it, it will be gone soon." Well, I didn't realize that it was permanent if I didn't appeal it. So, one day I was playing on CI, it was a normal day. And when we went in it was fine, we went to the elevator Checkpoint, that was fine also. When we went down the elevator, we were greeted by Omi9. They killed all of us and I said, "Wow, good job you have better aim than gensec." And later that day, I was striked. So, although I can see how this could be seen as branch diss to some people, I have reasons why I didn't think it was at the time. So, in TTT for example there is a model of gensec that has the description of, "Don't worry, this guy has great aim and you will NOT get caught in the crossfire." So someone with that high of permission put a joke about gensec and with that, I thought it was a commonly accepted joke. So when I said that I meant it as a joke, like the TTT description. However, in the clip I now realize that from their point of view, it doesn't sound like a joke. In summary, I was just joking, it didn’t sound like a joke, and I got striked. Thanks for your time.
  9. Post name: Make door breaching/calling admin to open door OOC. What are you suggesting? - I want the server to make calling an admin to breach your door as an SCP (especially 682 OOC). How would this change better the server? - Well, I just think it would make it more fair for people who spend 20 minutes self-breaching. For example I breached my first door, Nu7 come in, start shooting me, they ask for my HP, they stop, I say please give me a minute to call an admin to breach my door for me. They instead say, no. To be fair in RP I would be able to do this without an admin. They took the advantage of an OOC action and I wish for this to be stated in the motd. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - No, it would be overall more fair. Who would this change mostly benefit? - The player of 682, if we don't have 682 players then SCP-682 would be without use. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - As you can see from this recording they used an OOC event to their advantage.
  10. Name: GAM3 Rank: MSGT Callsign: XM1 Date of LOA Leave/Return:7/28/20- 8-5-20 Reason (if private write N/A): N/A
  11. GAM3

    GAM3's LOA

    Name: GAM3 Rank: MSGT Callsign: XM1 Date of LOA Leave/Return: 7/23/2020 - 7/27/2020 Reason (if private write N/A): N/A
  12. +Support I like the idea other than this one thing... Job Weapons: Remove: tfa_m4a1 Add: tfa_csgo_famas
  13. -Support It's cool and all but, it would be really complicated, cause lot's of problems, and just isn't worth adding.