Jump to content

Super_Smitty

SCP-RP
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • TS: ts.gaminglight.com

    Offline

About Super_Smitty

  • Birthday February 17

Recent Profile Visitors

911 profile views

Super_Smitty's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Superstar Rare
  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done
  • Dedicated
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

17

Reputation

  1. Name: Smitty Activity (1-5): 5 Last Promoted: N/A Date Joined: 5/5/22 SteamID: STEAM_0:1:90603211 Donator Rank: Diamond Notes: I didn't know this was posted and I also was not on the list in the announcement for it... sooo I assume i'm good.
  2. ACCEPTED Welcome aboard agent....
  3. YOUR APPLICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED...
  4. What bug is occurring?: 'Research Low Command' are unable to whitelist 'Lead Researcher' Is it tied to a specific job, swep, player model, etc? Yes, 'Research Low Command' Has it only occurred once, or is it continuous? Continuous Please provide screenshots or a short video of the bug in action: Done Note: Made on behalf of DHOR Nydekore's request I also find it really annoying that the ET rank is forced with the option to WL Security Enlisted... but this is unrelated
  5. Grading Results: Grammar: (10/10) I don't see anything wrong in grammar or sentence structure. Although the design makes me get lost in words. Design: (6/10) Honestly you deserve a ten. Because simplicity is a forum of design in itself, so its great don't misunderstand me. Its literally a better SCP-035 wiki design. However... when I grade design I do it off of three factors, the amount of effort into the document, the originality of the document, and the practicality of design. So for you the lack of barriers/spacing between "SCP Explanation/Background", "Hypothesis", "Analysis #", "Conclusions", etc. Just causes me to see a jumble of words while reading failing on practicality. Plus it docent have much originality.... which I should also mention using formats is a great alternative as well but it causes loss in originality/creativity points. I recommend just adding more, maybe make it look like its on paper, or if you want it to be from the "SCP Database" include some random site information like most websites have. Try to stick to a source of formatting. Creativity: (7/10) So your loosing some points because I'm easily lost on the hypothesis/purpose of the interviews besides data collection and cross analysis. Also proper conclusions with analysis on the interviewing docent seem to be present. Either than that the creativity is extremely high when it comes to using other interviews of SCP-035 impacting the main interview of Analysis C. Final Score: (23/30) Not bad, I'm just lost in the words. Work on better defining who, what, when, where and especially why. Also work on that design. This is easily something I can see on the SCP-035 wiki but not something I would like to see as a proper test from a gaminglight researcher. That sounds harsh but I am a hard grader and that does mean that these criticisms/critiques will better you on publishing research logs.
  6. YOUR APPLICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED...
  7. YOUR APPLICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED...
  8. I personally would listen to the audio file while reading the doc if your good ad multi-tasking or just wanna have something creepy playing in the background. Operation "Self Destruction" Project Self Destruction Audio File.mp3
  9. Test log assigned for grading Please wait 1-3 days for final score
  10. Test log assigned for grading Please wait 1-3 days for final score
  11. Test log assigned for grading Please wait 1-3 days for final score
  12. Test log assigned for grading Please wait 1-3 days for final score
  13. Test log assigned for grading Please wait 1-3 days for final score
  14. Test log assigned for grading Please wait 1-3 days for final score
  15. YOUR APPLICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED...
×
×
  • Create New...