Hope

Grade: 85% (B) Test Quality: Standard Lore: 20/20 Lore with SCP-096 is followed consistently through out the test. Creativity: 15/20 This test is rarely done, but have been done before numerous time before. Presentation: 20/20 Great use of fonts and formatting consistently through out the test log. Writing: 30/40 Writing is sufficient for this grade, good depth and detail. I am taking off marks due to the background research is copied and pasted. Overall: This test meets expectation.

OR7

Signed OR7

What is your in-game name?: hope What is your steam name?: [GL] hope What is your steam ID?: STEAM_0:0:210627742 Do you have any other experience with staffing?: (If yes, explain): Yes, I was previously part of ET. What date did you start playing on the community? (roughly): March 29th What date did you make your forums account?: April 7th. Current rank on server (This is a ULX rank ONLY! Not a RP Rank)?: Event Team Member, ULX rank will be set back to bronze after my 48 hours notice is up. How many warns do you have on the server (Show proof with a screenshot)?: 0 (refer below) Have you donated?: 50 USD What rank are you applying for?: Trial Moderator Are you staff on another community (BE HONEST)?: No Have you read the staff guidelines at ? You will be tested on it: I have read and understood the guidelines within the staff handbook. Timezone: EST Permission (Senior Moderator+ need this): N/A Why do you believe that you deserve the rank? (150 Word Minimum): When picking a community player for the rank of staff, the person should be dedicated, motivated and etc, this is because of that person being entrusted with administrative powers. However, many players applying for this rank have these qualities, but what sets me apart from other applicants applying for this rank is that I have experience from being a event team member, I am trustworthy, dedicated and optimistic and etc. I was a event team member from April 28th to June 15th, which during this period, I have learnt a lot of ULX commands and such. Whilst some might argues that this quality is very cliche and such, but I believe this quality is important for all applicants applying for this rank. Next, I am trustworthy, I can be trusted for the usage of administrative powers. I have been playing on this community for about 2 months now, with a play time of 6 weeks. Furthermore, I am also an event team member and also a research command, this proves that I am trustworthy within the community. I could go on and on forever about why I should be picked for this rank. However, one of the important quality I also grasp is, my optimism and dedication to the community. Every chance I get, I try to improve the community (as demonstrated in the past few months), either by hosting fun events or doing fun PTs or mass tests within my home branch. I believe my optimism can help brighten the staff, event team and the community in general as I am determined to help and give back to the community. In conclusion, I should be picked for staff due to my experience, my ability to be trusted and my dedication and optimism within the community, as I believe these qualities/characteristics are important to have within a staff member. How would you handle someone that is Mass RDMing and when you bring him/her to an admin sit all they do is curse at you?: If a player within the server is mass RDMing and were cursing at me when brought to a sit. First, I would calm both parties down as if the party(s) are cursing, it is harder and tedious to move on. If the player that was cursing calmed down, I would let both parties explain their side of the story and asked if any of them have video/photo evidence(s) of the other party breaking the rules of the server. If not, I will gag or/and mute the player depending on the severity. On the other hand, if no evidence were provided by the sides. I would then check logs to see if the accused player is mass RDMing. If they were caught and found committing mass RDM, I would issue a warning and request an admin + to issue a ban on the accused player (by going on the staff discord and requesting a ban).

Document is locked.

Sad to see you go, good luck with future endeavours.

How about me +support tho

Grade: B (80%) Test Quality: Standard Lore: 15/20 Lore with SCP-513 is followed. However, remember that we do not know that 1048 is hostile just yet, we only know that he is dangerous AFTER he constructed 1048-A. Hence, stating that you know SCP-1048 steals ear from the beginning isn't the lore friendly. Creativity: 20/20 Certainly, a creative test. First time I have seen SCP-1048 being exposed to a subject exposed to SCP-513. Presentation: 15/20 Boring white text with no pictures and etc. However, format was followed decently. Writing: 30/40 Writing is sufficient for this grade, some grammar mistakes can be found, not much though. Overall: This test meets expectations, try adding pictures or more details to your log. Other than that, keep it up!

I need access to this document. @zuroscorksin

Changing my -support to +/- support Squash lately has been proving himself to be a prominent command member, he has shown leadership, dedication and competency during my time as a 05 researcher, he has been very, very helpful. Good job! never expected for you to change that quickly!

+support The update that research needs

Name : hope Branch(es) : Medical, Janitorial, Technical Rank(s) : Elite Field Medic, EXP Janitor, Technician How would you rate your activity? (1-10): 6 Why you should keep your position (Command Only, 100 word minimum): N/A Any changes you would like to see: I would like to see more competition or challenges being held utility wide for the best activity, dedication etc. Any notes or questions: N/A

We are... research?

-/+ support Unless more evidence is presented, opinion will stay.

RFA Comms and radio: /mtf, /f, /research 4, 1, 3

+support Hell to the yes!!!!

Grade: F (45%) Test Quality: Sub-Standard Lore: 5/20 SCP-098 certainly does not favor prime ribs over normal crab food. Hence, lore was not followed. Creativity: 20/20 I'll give you that, the test was never done before. However, try to think of a test that would benefit the foundation than just thinking of a random test, but it is still a fun test to do. Presentation: 10/20 Boring white text with no pictures and etc. However, format was followed decently. Writing: 10/40 Test log is lacking in details, depth and etc. Grammar mistakes can be found through out the test log, writing is only sufficient for this grade. Overall: This test log does not meet expectation, make sure to add more details, depth and etc. Remember, pictures are a great way to enhance your test log!

Grade: F (55%) Test Quality: Sub-Standard Lore: 10/20 Lore was not followed consistently through out the test log, SCP-173 only attack out of sight, if you are looking at it, 173 shouldn't be able to move. Unless, you installed surveillance cameras in the testing chamber which you did not specify unfortunately. Creativity: 15/20 The test idea was done several times before. Presentation: 10/20 Format was followed, every thing is in order. However, boring white text with not use of pictures nor usage of fonts. Writing: 20/40 Test log is too lacking in details for any greater marks above 20, grammar mistakes can be found through out the log. Overall: This test does not meet expectation, make sure to revise your test before submitting. Remember, pictures are always great in terms of enhancing the presentation, and always go beyond by adding more depth to what happened during the test.

RIGs are not meant to patrol. However if they come across a hostile, they shoot them. RIGs shouldn't be taking the job of a GENSEC or MTF, they are meant to fill the void when GENSEC or MTF are understaffed. RIGs shouldn't be patrolling, they should be protecting researchers if there's any flag on, they help fill the void and the need for an escort when GENSEC or MTF is understaffed.

Just to add to my argument about this suggestion RIG are already terrible enough due to the tick rate buff, it is basically a GENSEC officer but with weaker gun and base health and armor. We have to remember that RIGs are robots, they are programmed to shoot on site, we have a full set of weapons for a reason. If you are a class D or a CI just running around and came across a RIG, expect to be shot as they are meant to do that, they eliminate threats to keep research and other personnel safe.

-support "The Research Intelligence Guardian is manufactured by the research department in order to assist with researchers tests while keeping other researchers and nearby personnel safe from hostile threats" RIGs are meant to act like a MTF/GENSEC but not taking over their job of course. They should have the right to shoot and kill on site if it is a hostile. They are meant to do that and not just stand by and just watch a class d walks past taunting them and immediately killing the escorted or the escort.

+ support I am not being bias at the slightest, it is just that I have many great experiences with Creamey. Creamey, he is a fun guy to hang around, competent individual, dedicated and motivated person and more. He also have a lot of experiences with event team stuff, with a whopping total of 18 events hosted; to me, that is a lot. Whilst some people have more events hosted than him, what really sets him apart is that he is very creative. Hence, Creamey would be a perfect fit for a senior event team member!