October

DENIED Sorry, but community blacklist's are no longer appealable. You may not attempt to appeal this again!

I mean if there’s a SGT+ on I wouldn’t do it, but rule of thumb is once you’re an NCO you can tell people to leave d-block.

Maynard lacks authority in d-block. Obviously a GENSEC OFC doesn’t outrank him, but a CPL does. What GENSEC should’ve done is just ordered him to leave d-block. (Failing to do so is AOS’able). The big issue is preventing testing. That’s just not pog, and CI shouldn’t be interfering with testing.

Here’s my take, yes, Maynard is a hybrid bound by the rules of both foundation doctor and CI, but Rookie stated that Maynard can’t just randomly KOS d-class. This seems semi-exaggerated by both sides, and I want to hear @[GL] Jack I the One & Only’s side, but Maynard shouldn’t just shoot d-class because they’re being cuffed. That’s not an “objective.” However, I do believe a warn is too harsh.

The rules on Maynard, from the foundation side, is that he is to be treated like a foundation doctor. This means that if he’s sniping d-class left and right then you should report him, as Rookie pointed out.

What are you suggesting? - removal of the chat box on the crash screen. How would this change better the server? - it would reduce down on minginess and spam. For example, people either post the n word or spam stuff like the bee movie/other annoying stuff. The chat box has reached a point where it’s no longer useful due to how players act. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - it would prevent communication for people that actually want to just chill and communicate. Who would this change mostly benefit? - people just who are annoyed by the spam lol. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A unless you want screenshots of spam or someone saying the n word

Here’s my take, while it does seem like an exploit there’s no precedent for this, but the MOTD does state “Do not intentionally exploit any glitches ... to gain an unfair advantage.” This doesn’t seem to me to be a super unfair advantage because you can kill BadAim and then grab 682 again so it seems to me to be no harm no foul. Further more, I see no proof that it was BadAim that fired the tranquilizer shots, from the evidence provided. This is possibly oversight by me, or I’m just too tired (lol it’s 2 am), -support over all.

Apologies for misunderstanding you on the “in the works” part. I forget if you informed me or not, and it must’ve slipped my mind, so for that I feel terrible. Again I’m sorry sir. -support to this suggestion as it’s been denied before and changing it to GENSEC doing it doesn’t change much.

According to Hoovy ID checkpoints are in the works. Here’s the current SOP that Dang and Aleks approved, https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Ak1_Vgbrf1XHDF1mK6mpWfQBYNA1EjpcE9pGe1FvLk/edit

Wow, coming from the man who inflated the economy. Lol

+support First of all, you’re a responsible and kind guy, so I think you’d be a good addition. Furthermore, you gave a couple of great responses to the simulated response questions. Good luck!

-/+ support leaning to a -support Sinnik you’re a great and kind guy, but you didn’t give the best answer to the final question, and you could work on forums activity. Of course, I wish you the best of luck!

-support I’m going to give a more clarifying comment to explain my reasoning. I consider 75+ to be a perfect number because we constantly hit 75+ players. Making it 70 would only make it harder on MTF. With the current system it’s already hard at times to mitigate breaches, for a few reasons but none in particular, lowering it to 70 would only increase the frequency of defcon 2’s. Especially since, 1 d-class getting past GENSEC can cause a defcon 2 if they’re strategic (ask Comrade lol). Frequent defcon 2’s take away from the experience for other branches, utility and research namely. I believe the current system that we have it totally fine. Sure this would be nice for SCP’s to be able to breach more frequently, but it would take away from many other branches.

I caught you playing chess on duty, we can’t have that! Anyways, jokes aside, Cogs is an amazing and kind person. He’s very responsible and would make a great addition to the forum diplomats team. Good luck Cogs!

Big +support Jimmy you’re on awesome guy, and you have wonderful judgement, as proven by the fact that you’re trusted to be HCMD and you’re a senior admin. Good luck.

Nice lol soon you’ll join the big boy club with 500+

That would require a complete and total overhaul of the SWEP and it would make 966 far too OP because they don’t need to commit to you they just need to hit you once with a SWEP with awesome hitreg. If this were added, SMT would need to make the hitreg on the 966 SWEP and add a cool down between swings or something. Over all, -support because I don’t think coding a custom 966 SWEP, when the current system is fine, is a good use of SMT’s time.

-/+ support You have to realize that that was multiple suggestions on one post and Igneous hit the standard accept button (to briefly explain this, there’s a button that SMT can hit on suggestions to create that copy and paste post, move it to accepted, and lock it). I believe when he was accepting it he was accepting suggestion 1 and 3 because they’ve been implemented (d-class brute and clarification on GENSEC adverting). My reasoning is supported by RookieBlue’s recent statement that d-class NLR is 90 seconds. Of course, I could be wrong too, and we’ll never know until Igneous responds, but I believe that you’re misinterpreting what he accepted.

This used to exist, I believe it was probably unintentionally removed due to small errors. +support as it wouldn’t be taxing on the server and can grow activity in those branches.

Yea -support, just no. The strength of d-class is not meant to be their hp or weapons it’s their numbers because they outnumber everyone else 3+ to 1. Also let’s take the lowest numbers you inputted for hp, 75 75. That’s 150 total shots which if it’s just an OFC that would prob take half their mag. This class would just kill do 1 for 1’s, meaning they would kill 1 officer and then die. The duel barretas are far too strong to go on a d-class job Also spawning in medical supplies makes no sense? Where do they get sutures and actual medical equipment?

Maybe so, but picture this scenario, you’re an untrained researcher who only has a pistol, that’s on safety! All of a sudden, 4 heavily armed well trained men with heavy weaponry threaten your life, what are you going to do? Will you let them kill you or will you put away your gun? Maybe you could turn off the safety quickly, but that’s still a major risk, and you’re definitely losing your life if you do so. This suggestion isn’t directly towards an E11 officer because he too is well trained and also has heavy weaponry. This is for the researcher who has no body protection or training.

What a shame to see you go Bionicle, what a shame.

There is in fact reason for why you were blacklisted. You have 6 warns for failRP across different SCP’s. https://gaminglight.com/bans/player/76561198860655735 Also, blacklists don’t expire unless appealed so that doesn’t make sense. Major -support, you’ve abused the 173 and 106 SWEP, entered d-block as 682, killed other SCP’s while on 912, etc. If you aren’t blacklisted from 173/106/343 I’d be surprised and disheartened.

-support This just ain’t it, chief.