Jump to content

October

Member
  • Posts

    1,958
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

October last won the day on September 11 2020

October had the most liked content!

3 Followers

About October

Recent Profile Visitors

3,607 profile views

October's Achievements

Master

Master (13/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

335

Reputation

  1. +support, Chief is a great, responsible guy, and I would love to see him in this position.
  2. Rektify said it perfectly. You’ve been here for awhile and why would you read the rules now and change compared to before you got banned? I don’t believe you deserve to be unbanned at all. -support
  3. That’s just false. It was used by me on one of my majors to remove him from his CI rank. But if I’m being serious, PK’s are very unnecessary and aren’t needed. A1 in its old state of protecting site admins is unnecessary, but I’m interested in your ISD suggestion. I do believe that it would serve better as a sub-branch than actual branch or else it would suffer with activity like other MTF branches have.
  4. -support I don’t think it’d look much better. It’s just a touch too tedious and unnecessary.
  5. When you purchase a cc you have to specify what branch you belong to. You have to follow their SOP, regardless of your name. Anyways, +support, clear NLR violations
  6. The argument is that there’s “no rule that d-class have to side with CI.” Personally I think it’s incredibly dumb, but major +support this is just power gaming.
  7. @The Red Eyed Cat you were banned for the following offense(s): RDMx22/MRDMx4. That’s a hefty crime and deserves the punishment you’ve received.
  8. I agree to a certain extent, we shouldn’t hide 682 behind a pay wall by raising him to plat, but I do believe a raise to gold would be appropriate. As to the issue of 457, please don’t lower that at all as it would make platinum even sadder to buy as it doesn’t offer much at the moment.
  9. Seems a bit extreme. While you should speak with a branches high command before suggesting a change, there are certain balancing issues that might not be agreed on between the two parties. An instant denial is far too extreme especially if the idea has merits.
  10. So the idea is that the punishment is staff discretion, but it’s a minimum punishment of a 1 week ban. The current system is fine as is because if it’s severe they’re already guaranteed a permanent ban
  11. You didn’t need to answer this.
  12. Here’s my take, this doesn’t seem like an issue. If you were shot there are logs that show the staff member where you were shot. I trust Bacon’s judgement. -support. The comment does seem disrespectful, and your response was sarcastic.
  13. Moved to the correct section.
×
×
  • Create New...