Rookieblue

Jesus christ, this has been up for 34 minutes and I'm already having to lock it. Give a guy some time

But did you unsubscribe from all of your other workshop content when you did that, because having a clean build and adding everything back is different than having some content still on your build that is causing the same issues.

I'm just subscribed to the workshop stuff in the pack and I have everything. Try unsubscribing to everything so you have a clean build, and then resubscribe to them. That fixes it generally.

I have been informed that some of those statements are automatic from the coffee machine SCP. I've never actually seen the coffee machine used, and was not aware of that! I'll take the hit on that and admit my mistake. My apologies there.

You have the following warning that are less than three months old: 05/08/2020, 18:01:16 - PoliceRP - [GL] General Hotshot - Building Across SPawm Additionally you also have a ban for reaching the 10 warning threshold on PoliceRP. I think all the information that I provided in my initial post described the situation and facts pretty well. Based on the information that I had, I did not feel a sit was necessary, as as a Senior Management Team member that is my prerogative. The warning and ban reasons laid out exactly why you received a warning and ban. I've been playing on the SCPRP server since January of 2019, I'm one of two Head Admins on the server, and I'm the Head Forum Diplomat, and I have served in a variety of leadership capacities within the server. I'm also the individual in change of updating and writing new rules for the MOTD. There are few other players that have my level of knowledge and experience with the server. Based on the evidence I gathered, I think it absolutely warrants a short ban from the server. This is entirely false. You made a choice to make the statement, I took the nature of your statement and your history into account, as well as your other actions on the server. The situation you describe is someone else creating a situation to suit them. You created the situation yourself and are being held accountable for it. You have received the following warnings for misconduct on the PoliceRP server in 2020, which contradicts your statement: 01/11/2020, 14:09:26 - PoliceRP - [GL] Water - Fear rp 01/15/2020, 00:20:51 - PoliceRP - [GL] Will - LTAP 03/02/2020, 01:38:45 - PoliceRP - [GL] SpadeH - Corruption 04/03/2020, 21:49:27 - PoliceRP - bT aSSailaNTT - Raid 04/13/2020, 21:41:21 - PoliceRP - Springs [572] - Fail RP 05/08/2020, 18:01:16 - PoliceRP - [GL] General Hotshot - Building Across SPawm Your ban appeal will be handled by a different member of the Senior Management Team, not myself. So one of them will make the final decision on whether the ban will stay in place or will be removed.

While on the server I observed the above player state in OOC chat: "Rhammer ➞ user: [OOC] Gaminglight Police RP Gov commits warcrimes" Given the ongoing political unrest in the Unites States that this touches on (claims that law enforcement are engaging in warcrimes), as well as the disrespect towards a fellow GamingLight server and branch I looked into the player's logs a bit. While going through the logs I uncovered the player making a disparaging remark against another player, the context of which was grabbing a D-Class to kill. "Rhammer ➞ user: This isnt a peggu but this will work" Upon further checking I found other questionable messages sent by this user: "Rhammer ➞ user: Tastes like a cripple... Wait. *SCREAMS*" "Rhammer ➞ user: [OOC] STFU darosali2" Upon checking this individual's history I also discovered that Rhammer has a history of minging on PoliceRP. Based on the information I found above, as well as taking into account the individual's past history, I issued a warning for server disrespect, which covers the comments made disrespecting PoliceRP's government branches, as well as a one week ban from the SCP server. Typically, server disrespect bans are one month long or longer, however, as this disrespect was toward a different server, and not as blatant as most disrespect instances, I reduced the ban length to one week.

Accepted Thank you for the report. Appropriate action against the player and or staff member will be taken to ensure that they receive the correct punishment.

Accepted Thank you for the report. Appropriate action against the player and or staff member will be taken to ensure that they receive the correct punishment.

Accepted Thank you for the report. Appropriate action against the player and or staff member will be taken to ensure that they receive the correct punishment.

Igneous laid this out perfectly.

Denied Based on the information provided in this appeal, I am upholding the ban.

- Support Not lore friendly, SCP 096 doesn't need a nerf at this time.

- Support This is just RDM but will result in the researcher being murdered instead.

Can Bongoz maybe respond to this suggestion so we can stop guessing at what he means?

Or we could just change the number to something that doesn't exist again, which I would be more in favor of.

Denied. Branch update suggestions can only be requested by the head of their respective branch.

You're gonna need to define metabaiting for me, and the context of when it would come into play. Also there shouldn't be any unwritten rules, which is why I tell people to tell me them so I can make them written.

The designer of this model has copy-written it. As such we do not use this model, as the usage of it is extremely gray. While yes, anyone can use SCP-173, you have to pay to purchase GMOD, you can pay to buy levels to unlock SCP-173 faster, and you can pay to purchase other benefits on the server. This has been requested time and time again, and it will continue to be denied.

There's no way to tell if someone has their gun out and on safety unless you have video proof. I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to a rule change that would allow a group of personnel to FearRP someone even if they have a gun out while combat has not started, but again, as logs only show single individuals, rather that an entire group, you would need video evidence to back up any report or admin sit. If this is approved I'd need a minute to think of solid rules that would make sense and reduce the potential for the staff team getting bombarded by sits from armed D-Class claiming they're FearRP'ing the entire GENSEC defense line in D-Block.

Current rule is that 106 must win a roll off with a staff member.

Suggestion: Anyone interested in having a custom class in a branch (GENSEC, MTF, CI) must meet and communicate expectations between the branch high command and the CC owner. The CC owner and all people on the CC must comply with the branch's SOP, and would have a rank within the branch. This coordination would address issues within this suggestions, such as restricting certain CCs from certain locations, and is better managed by the branch's command members, who regularly deal with these types of issues on a day to day basis. Benefits: + CC Owners and Branch Command able to communicate expectations and restrictions clearly + CC's having an RP rank allows them to still fall under normal command structure, promoting a better sense of unity rather than just having CC's that do whatever they want + Individuals with CC whitelists are held individually accountable for misconduct, and can be punished accordingly, rather than an entire CC developing a poor reputation Cons - Will require enhanced coordination and communication between branch command and multiple individuals. I recommend keeping communication between the branch command and CC owner, and having the CC owner be responsible for communicating expectations to the people on their CC. - May result in less interest in CC in the Foundation Branches, as people will need to comply with SOPs, which some people purchase CCs to specifically not have to do so.

@Hoovy You issued this ban For background, this player has a total of 24 warnings and 5 bans on his account, from September 2019 - February 2020, at which point he was banned. Warning reasons range from RDM, Prop Minging, Player/Staff/Branch Dis, FailRP to include faking rolls/self breaching/teaming, among other various offenses.

In answer to your question, racism, homophobia, anti-semitism, and the like are not tolerated on the SCPRP server, nor the greater GamingLight Community at all. Our staff team does a great job addressing instances of this conduct at the time of the offense, including issuing the relevant warning and automatic 7 day ban that accompanies this type of misconduct. Unfortunately, staff members in the moment may miss that an individual has had previous types of misconduct of this level in the past. I started conducting regular audits of all warnings and bans that are administered on the server as of two months ago, and this includes evaluating individuals that have histories of significant misconduct on the server. This player came to my attention when during my audit I found that he was warned twice in one day, once for RDM and a second time for NLR Violation x5. So the player did indeed have recent misconduct that would warrant a ban. As he has two past documented incidents of racism, those being: 10/28/2019, 21:45:31 - SCP - [GL] Rookieblue - Racism 02/16/2020, 04:40:22 - SCP - Weiss Schnee G - Mass Racism As well as numerous warnings for Player Disrespect, Branch Disrespect, and Staff Disrespect, this player has shown their commitment to being toxic and not wanting to follow the rules set out by the MOTD. Based on the large impact that racism incidents have on our players and the overall community, strict consequences are applied when these incidents occur. While the permanent ban in this instance may have not occurred directly at the time of the incident, the ban is no less valid, nor less warranted.

I issued the ban upon my audit of the day's warnings for SCPRP. In my judgement the violation of such a simple rule 15 times deserves more punishment that a simple warning and jail. Upon entering the server you are shown the Message of the Day, which lays out the rules that are expected of you while playing on the server. Closing the MOTD shows that understand the rules and agree to abide by them.

This ban was issues following an audit of a recent warning he received. As he has two or more racism/homophobia/transphobia/etc warnings on his record I issued a permanent ban to this player. Racism and other similar acts are not tolerated on this server, nor the greater GamingLight Community. This ban is in line with the Staff Handbook Guidelines on the subject, and is also in line with how similar incidents have been handled in the past.