Cecil Stedmen Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 (edited) What are you suggesting? - Create an exception for the 5 minute timer before you can breach if let out IF the SCP was requested for a test and/or breached as a result of a test gone wrong. Edit: Gonna add this as well. In order for it to be a valid test; it must be done by a member of CI RND, RRH Analyst, Research, or Site Admin+ that is cleared to test on the SCP. So a breach caused by a 610 test being done by a JR wouldn't be considered a valid breach in the first 5 mins due to not being allowed to test on the SCP. How would this change better the server? - It closes a potential loophole where researchers can request an SCP to flag up and not need to take necessary security procedures under the 5 min rule. Never seen this loophole abused but it's best to close the loophole before that happens. Ensuring an SCP doesn't breach is something Research Command emphasizes to enlisted researchers; pretty much every SCP has a means of ensuring it doesn't breach and a bit of creative roleplay can also be done to ensure an SCP does not breach if nothing in the MOTD is listed to help limit a breach from occurring. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Genuinely don't see any; it's simply closing a loophole that needed to be closed. Who would this change mostly benefit? - SCPs Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A Edited February 28, 2022 by Cecil Stedmen Made a change to the suggestion based on Nyde's response 1 Former SCPRP: CI R&D Chief Director of Operations || Research Administrator || RFA Operations Advisory || RRH Analyst Xray 77 || CI General || Senior Event Team || CI Lieutenant Commander || Exemplary Investigator Award Recipient || STF D4 Poseidon PL7 || A1 SPC "Quantum" Former ImperialRP: Naval Captain || Security Director || GM VI Former PoliceRP: EMS Captain || RRU Rapid Response Team Manager || FBI Assistant Director Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydekore Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 -Support While I agree researchers shouldn’t abuse this, it’s something Moonrose and I can work to enforce. This could lead to minges breaching SCPs by claiming it was “for testing” Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cecil Stedmen Posted February 28, 2022 Author Share Posted February 28, 2022 20 minutes ago, Nydekore said: -Support While I agree researchers shouldn’t abuse this, it’s something Moonrose and I can work to enforce. This could lead to minges breaching SCPs by claiming it was “for testing” Then we punish them for not taking proper security procedures and causing a breach, and if it was deliberate then just slap them a removal + DNT or a blacklist as they gonna do it anyways. Although I will say in order to fully close the loop and limit abuse of the loophole closing; I'll edit the suggestion to add; in order for it to count as a test, it must be done by either a member of Research or CI RND that is cleared to test on the SCP. So if a JR breaches 610 during a "test" then it's voided as they weren't cleared to test on the SCP. Former SCPRP: CI R&D Chief Director of Operations || Research Administrator || RFA Operations Advisory || RRH Analyst Xray 77 || CI General || Senior Event Team || CI Lieutenant Commander || Exemplary Investigator Award Recipient || STF D4 Poseidon PL7 || A1 SPC "Quantum" Former ImperialRP: Naval Captain || Security Director || GM VI Former PoliceRP: EMS Captain || RRU Rapid Response Team Manager || FBI Assistant Director Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Twix Bar Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 Aren't SCPs not allowed to breach during tests, like how they can't during feedings? Regardless, -Support. We shouldn't encourage people to beach during tests, it'd just ruin Research's rp. Current: None Former: Security Sergeant Major (and SFC), Director of Logistics, Alpha-1 Private First Class, CI Mil Private First Class (and E4 C6), Nu7 Lance Corporal, CI RnD Supervisory Agent (and EOI F3) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cecil Stedmen Posted February 28, 2022 Author Share Posted February 28, 2022 1 hour ago, Right Twix Bar said: Aren't SCPs not allowed to breach during tests, like how they can't during feedings? Regardless, -Support. We shouldn't encourage people to beach during tests, it'd just ruin Research's rp. They can breach during a test unless it's a mass test as those are OOC and all of research should be taking proper security procedures during their test; thats not ruining RP, it's adding to it. Every SCP has a means to keep it inside during a test and if it doesn't then creative RP can fix that. The purpose of this is to ensure researchers take proper security procedures as they should. We recently added a joint subbranch between gensec and research called RIG whose sole purpose is to escort researchers. Utilizing them properly makes testing extremely easy even with this new rule in place. Former SCPRP: CI R&D Chief Director of Operations || Research Administrator || RFA Operations Advisory || RRH Analyst Xray 77 || CI General || Senior Event Team || CI Lieutenant Commander || Exemplary Investigator Award Recipient || STF D4 Poseidon PL7 || A1 SPC "Quantum" Former ImperialRP: Naval Captain || Security Director || GM VI Former PoliceRP: EMS Captain || RRU Rapid Response Team Manager || FBI Assistant Director Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demon Dice Posted February 28, 2022 Share Posted February 28, 2022 2 hours ago, Right Twix Bar said: Aren't SCPs not allowed to breach during tests, like how they can't during feedings? Regardless, -Support. We shouldn't encourage people to beach during tests, it'd just ruin Research's rp. Demonically Inspired ..Nu7 CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Its Buck Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 +support This would be a great way to enhance RP with SCP's if a test causes a containment breach then the researchers can fill out a incident report. thats what its for after all. It also increases the fun for MTF and SCP players to actually have a job to do whilst escorting for tests. I would really like to see this implimented RETIRED SCP-RP:Delta-5 CPT | Deputy Head G9| Medical DHFW Doctor. | E11 1LT | Head Ranger | D4 Vanguard FF5 | RnD EOI V3 Canibal ImperialRP: MC 1LT Bacon 3817 | DT SGT FF5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PandaInShitpostLand Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 12 minutes ago, Its Buck said: +support This would be a great way to enhance RP with SCP's if a test causes a containment breach then the researchers can fill out a incident report. thats what its for after all. It also increases the fun for MTF and SCP players to actually have a job to do whilst escorting for tests. I would really like to see this implimented +Support 1. Incident reports are badass 2. Making this exist will add danger to testing scps and proper safety precautions will need to be taken. there is no ruining RP if the researcher failed to account for security (like how actual researchers will treat an actual test) The God Gamer of the Shitpost Squadron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydekore Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 29 minutes ago, Its Buck said: This would be a great way to enhance RP with SCP's if a test causes a containment breach then the researchers can fill out a incident report. thats what its for after all. It also increases the fun for MTF and SCP players to actually have a job to do whilst escorting for tests. While this is not necessarily what this suggestion is about as SCPs CAN breach during testing already, I will look into making a proper "incident report" format to put perhaps in the Foundation Test Logs forum. 1 Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geeko Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 (edited) +Support Prevents Researchers from being protected for the first 5 minutes of the test which totally ruins some poggers RP uwu Edited March 1, 2022 by Geeko R&D Chief Inspector and Poop Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gaming Goat Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 13 hours ago, PandaInShitpostLand said: +Support 1. Incident reports are badass 2. Making this exist will add danger to testing scps and proper safety precautions will need to be taken. there is no ruining RP if the researcher failed to account for security (like how actual researchers will treat an actual test) Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diz Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 + Support I've seen this loophole being abused a few times, it's really annoying if you're the SCP. Retired SCP-RP Admin/ETM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandtoad Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 22 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support While I agree researchers shouldn’t abuse this, it’s something Moonrose and I can work to enforce. This could lead to minges breaching SCPs by claiming it was “for testing” THE BEST AMPHIBIAN Custom Classes | Cybernetic Protective Unit Owner | A Normal D-Class Owner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Doc Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 On 2/28/2022 at 12:01 PM, Nydekore said: -Support While I agree researchers shouldn’t abuse this, it’s something Moonrose and I can work to enforce. This could lead to minges breaching SCPs by claiming it was “for testing” +Support cant enforce what isnt seen. Accountability is on the individual not command. Also breached SCPs are fun! More breaches more fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 On 2/28/2022 at 7:54 PM, Cecil Stedmen said: CI RND, RRH Analyst Sorry to say this but I don't trust CI with just accidently letting a scp insta breach so if we make it only apply for foundation research then im g with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cecil Stedmen Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 57 minutes ago, Coltable said: Sorry to say this but I don't trust CI with just accidently letting a scp insta breach so if we make it only apply for foundation research then im g with that. understandable Former SCPRP: CI R&D Chief Director of Operations || Research Administrator || RFA Operations Advisory || RRH Analyst Xray 77 || CI General || Senior Event Team || CI Lieutenant Commander || Exemplary Investigator Award Recipient || STF D4 Poseidon PL7 || A1 SPC "Quantum" Former ImperialRP: Naval Captain || Security Director || GM VI Former PoliceRP: EMS Captain || RRU Rapid Response Team Manager || FBI Assistant Director Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravergang Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 On 2/28/2022 at 1:02 PM, Right Twix Bar said: Aren't SCPs not allowed to breach during tests, like how they can't during feedings? Regardless, -Support. We shouldn't encourage people to beach during tests, it'd just ruin Research's rp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallow Purple Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 On 3/13/2022 at 9:23 PM, Coltable said: Sorry to say this but I don't trust CI with just accidently letting a scp insta breach so if we make it only apply for foundation research then im g with that. Dont forget about CTF D5 cause we can test on scps as well ;-;.Mega +Support The biggest allure of SCP in general is the danger of testing going wrong and a simple error leading to a keter breach or worse, I think it ruins rp possibilities if an SCP is forced to stay and do nothing cause of a rule that is strictly speaking an invisible chain. Also incident reports are super cool and need to be implemented in some way SCP RP - MTF D5 VCMDR Robby | CTF D5 Founder/Overseer of Operations "Omniscient Eyes" Mu Cephei COA | Ex CI R&D AIN INF Gerry | EX RRH Engineer Uniform 48 | EX RS Robby | OG Technical Low Command | Beans’ Test Dummy | Participated In The Legendary Technical Bombing Of Site-O5 | OG Janitorial Low Command and Assistant Head of Containment Cleaners | Creator of the DENSEC on Site-O5 | Imperial RP - Former Creator of Medical Research Citadel / Medical Captain Citadel | Former IC VCOM Scorch | Former SF Vice Marshal Walter | Creator of ST Riot Troopers and Original Leader | Former Nova Trooper Marksman 2LT Judge NT20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stSavagerY Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 On 2/28/2022 at 3:01 PM, Nydekore said: -Support While I agree researchers shouldn’t abuse this, it’s something Moonrose and I can work to enforce. This could lead to minges breaching SCPs by claiming it was “for testing” Nu-7 COL / SFTO / FE / TRT / BHM / RG / Head SCP-7101 / C0 FM HTF / SF Overseer / Iota-10 ("Damn Feds") / AFK / Solid Snake / SCP-RP Senior Moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazza Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 On 3/1/2022 at 2:00 PM, PandaInShitpostLand said: +Support 1. Incident reports are badass 2. Making this exist will add danger to testing scps and proper safety precautions will need to be taken. there is no ruining RP if the researcher failed to account for security (like how actual researchers will treat an actual test) Freedom at last. Former: Assistant Inspector, Head of Longshot, Research Assistant Supervisor & Operations Supervisor, G.O.C. Officer & Head of bulldozers, CI COL, EOI D-2, DJ Former: Scout Captain, Second Lieutenant, Senior Crewman, Storm Commando Captain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tydrix Weeb Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 On 2/28/2022 at 3:01 PM, Nydekore said: -Support While I agree researchers shouldn’t abuse this, it’s something Moonrose and I can work to enforce. This could lead to minges breaching SCPs by claiming it was “for testing” Current Ranks: N/A Former Ranks: CI SFTO HLS Major D4 Ambrose IV RRH Guardian Romeo 13 SCP-RP Senior Admin RFM EXM CCU CC's: MTF E11 'Last Call' CI Recon Force Frank West MTF Sigma 66 Trooper CI TF2 Heavy Security Elite Sniper The Mets Farmer Jakub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
styx Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 On 2/28/2022 at 9:30 PM, PandaInShitpostLand said: +Support 1. Incident reports are badass 2. Making this exist will add danger to testing scps and proper safety precautions will need to be taken. there is no ruining RP if the researcher failed to account for security (like how actual researchers will treat an actual test) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts