Gunther Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 (edited) What you want to see? - I want to see two Keypads in the Medbay that controls both doors separately. Edit: Removed the second suggestion portion. Why should we add it? - There's a rule stating that CI, D-Class, and anyone without the proper clearance can't lockdown Medbay due to Medical not being able to leave spawn without the threat of dying, I think, I might be wrong. I believe adding a 2nd keypad would do a couple things for all parties:-First off, a 2nd keypad would make it so unlocking Medbay isn't as risky and leave Medbay exposed for 15 seconds; it would allow MTF and whoever to slip in before closing the door behind them and opening their exit, whereas currently opening Medbay has the risk of an SCP, D-Class, or CI. being able to come in during the 7-15 seconds MTF is going through. -The second being it allows for more tactical approaches, such as CI and D-Class, with Medical being under FearRP, being to block off MTF while they make their escape, while vice versa, MTF, with the help of Medical, can lockdown the Elevator Door and prepare to ambush CI, while at the same not forcing either faction to be stuck inside. -Adding a 2nd keypad wouldn't be a huge inconvenience for Foundation as it takes half a second to activate both, and both keypads would be next to each other. Its a small change, and it wouldn't take much time at all. What are the advantages of having this? - Adds more tactics for MTF/D-Class/CI and allows CI and D-Class to be able lockdown Medbay without trapping themselves or camping Medical. Who is it mainly for? - Foundation/CI/Class-D Links to any content - Edited June 5, 2020 by Gunther Removed the 2nd suggestion. Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 -Support, this would still allow for the exact issue's what the no locking if not Medical rule is made to counter. "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Zeus Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Falxen said: -Support, this would still allow for the exact issue's what the no locking if not Medical rule is made to counter. This kinda just destroys the point of locking down medbay to contain threats Former || SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin || Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poptarts Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 2 hours ago, Falxen said: -Support, this would still allow for the exact issue's what the no locking if not Medical rule is made to counter. | SCP-RP | Senior Moderator | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Inaccurate Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 3 hours ago, Falxen said: -Support, this would still allow for the exact issue's what the no locking if not Medical rule is made to counter. 1 hour ago, [GL] Zeus said: This kinda just destroys the point of locking down medbay to contain threats "Pay increase declined. Welcome to the Foundation, get used to it." -O5-6 3rd time Head of Medical Staff | Ex-Director of Research and Security | Ex-Director of Utility | Ex-Senior Admin for SCP-RP | Ex-Admin for TTT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakub Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 -support,this will highly confuse things and lower the efficiency of the lock down tenfold. Ex E11 COL, Ex A1 MAJ, Ex AHOTS, Ex Security 2LT, Ex Admin. Current CI 2LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surge Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 13 hours ago, Falxen said: -Support, this would still allow for the exact issue's what the no locking if not Medical rule is made to counter. yeah that ^ 1 Ret MTF Nu7 1LT SFTO Surge| Ret OH2 RRH , Retired SM Gensec | No officer that 24Pounds of plutonium isn't mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I disappear Posted June 5, 2020 Share Posted June 5, 2020 -support as a part of the medical branch this will make it inefficient to lock down med bay and is unnecessary. 'Cause you can't feel my anger You can't feel my pain You can't feel my torment Driving me insane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creamey Posted June 5, 2020 Share Posted June 5, 2020 -support this suggestion is improperly worded, so I have no idea what you mean when you say On 6/4/2020 at 5:13 AM, Gunther said: allows CI and D-Class to be able lockdown Medbay without trapping themselves or camping Medical. It just seems like it takes the purpose of lockdown away, which could be solved if the outer of the first set of doors required a keypad. Overall, I don’t think this would be functional and a good addition for RP on the server. [SCP-RP] Retired Head Of Security || Retired Field Work Manager || Retired OM3 || Retired Event Team Member [JvS no more] Former FIRST The Grand Inquisitor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted June 5, 2020 Author Share Posted June 5, 2020 (edited) On 6/4/2020 at 5:57 AM, Falxen said: -Support, this would still allow for the exact issue's what the no locking if not Medical rule is made to counter. 5 hours ago, CreameyCheesey said: -support this suggestion is improperly worded, so I have no idea what you mean when you say It just seems like it takes the purpose of lockdown away, which could be solved if the outer of the first set of doors required a keypad. Overall, I don’t think this would be functional and a good addition for RP on the server. Changed. Removed the part asking for CI/D-Class/MTF being allowed to lockdown Medbay, and reworded the other parts in green to involve Medical in all processes. Also, switched the main reasoning for the change with the Tactical reasoning, which is more a secondary reason. Edited June 5, 2020 by Gunther Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Inaccurate Posted June 5, 2020 Share Posted June 5, 2020 (edited) Still -Support The point of a lockdown is nobody comes in, nobody goes out (unless needed). Adding this basically makes Medbay a second Checkpoint... Edited June 5, 2020 by [GL] Inaccurate "Pay increase declined. Welcome to the Foundation, get used to it." -O5-6 3rd time Head of Medical Staff | Ex-Director of Research and Security | Ex-Director of Utility | Ex-Senior Admin for SCP-RP | Ex-Admin for TTT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a frog Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 -support The fuck is this five nights at freddys E11 1LT []FORMER CI MAJOR[]Former MTF OMICRON-9 CAPTAIN[]Former Janitorial Low Command[]Former E11 HCMD[Former overseer of D4,Former experimental, Former E4]"The fuck is a ethics committee?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Propane Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 22 hours ago, [GL] Inaccurate said: Still -Support The point of a lockdown is nobody comes in, nobody goes out (unless needed). Adding this basically makes Medbay a second Checkpoint... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadTimeInbound Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 -Support Having more keypads means more things to keep track of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggo0 Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 On 6/5/2020 at 9:01 PM, [GL] Inaccurate said: Still -Support The point of a lockdown is nobody comes in, nobody goes out (unless needed). Adding this basically makes Medbay a second Checkpoint... SCPRP Director of Logistics, Event Team | Former Nu7 2LT, Former Senior Admin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts